California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 948 — Property taxation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 352, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 01, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing property tax law provides that information and records in the assessor's office are not public documents and shall not be open to public inspection, except as specified. Existing law also requires the assessor to disclose certain appraisal information to specified state and local agencies. This bill would require the assessor, upon the written request of the tax collector, to provide to the tax collector information for the preparation and enforcement of tax sales, in accordance with specified procedures, and would require the tax collector to reimburse the assessor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the assessor for providing this information. The bill would require the tax collector to add those costs to the delinquent taxes and other costs, as specified. The bill would require the tax collector or his or her designated employee to certify specified declarations under penalty of perjury. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. By requiring new duties of local government officials with respect to providing property tax sales information, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing property tax law establishes a procedure by which an assessee of property taxes may pay taxes under protest in cases in which the assessor does not, upon or prior to completion of the local tax roll, send a notice to an assessee whose property was not on the prior year's secured roll, or to an assessee of real property on the local secured roll whose property's full value has increased. Under existing property tax law, a protest is required to be made by filing with the tax collector, together with the payment of the taxes or their first installment, a petition for assessment reduction on the form prescribed by the county board, which form the collector is to forward to the clerk of the county board with the notation that taxes were paid under protest. This bill would modify this procedure to instead require protests to be made by filing with the clerk of the county board a petition for assessment reduction on the form prescribed by the county board. The bill would also remove the requirement that protests be filed together with the payment of the taxes or their first installment and would make related technical and nonsubstantive changes. (3) Existing property tax law allows any county department, officer, or employee that is legally responsible for the collection of any amount owing the county to apply to the county board of supervisors for discharge of that responsibility on the grounds that the amount owed is too small to justify the costs of collection. This bill would revise that provision to authorize a discharge from accountability for the collection of the amount if performed in accordance with specified procedures. (4) Existing property tax law authorizes any tax collector charged with collecting any delinquent taxes on unsecured property to apply to the county board of supervisors for a discharge of the responsibility on the grounds that the amount is too small to justify the costs of collection. This bill would revise those provisions to authorize a county department, officer, or employee charged with that responsibility to apply for a discharge from accountability if performed in accordance with specified procedures. (5) Existing property tax law requires each county assessor to determine the assessed value of taxable real property and personal property, and requires each county tax collector to collect the taxes levied on those assessed values. Existing property tax law authorizes a county tax collector to sell tax-defaulted property after a specified amount of time. Existing property tax law also authorizes the tax collector, upon the recommendation of county counsel, to remove a parcel from a tax sale, as provided, and requires the tax collector to notify the Controller of that removal. This bill would eliminate the tax collector's notification requirement. (6) Existing property tax law generally authorizes a county tax collector to sell tax-defaulted property 5 years or more after that property has become tax defaulted. Existing law authorizes any party of interest in the property to file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds from the sale, at any time prior to the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collector's deed to the purchaser. Existing property tax law requires any person or entity that in any way acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to submit proof with the claim that the amount of excess proceeds has been disclosed to the party of interest, and that the party of interest has been advised of the right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on his or her own behalf. This bill would additionally require any person or entity that in any way acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to submit proof with the claim that the source of the excess proceeds has been disclosed to the party of interest, and that the party of interest has been advised of the right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on his or her own behalf, as provided. (7) Existing property tax law requires a county to provide notice, including publishing notice in a newspaper, of the right to claim the excess proceeds from the sale of a tax-defaulted property. This bill would eliminate the requirement to publish the notice in a newspaper if the cost to publish is equal to or more than the excess proceeds from the sale. (8) Existing property tax law requires a tax collector to publish various publications within a specified time period, relating to, among other things, notice of impending default for failure to pay taxes on real property and notice of intended sale of tax-defaulted property by the tax collector. That law authorizes a publication to be republished, if any error or defect has been carried into any publication, made in the same manner as the original publication and for not less than one week. This bill would authorize, if the error or defect is discovered after the time required for the original publication, the publication to be republished within 60 days of the original time period required. This bill would require the republication to not adversely affect the right of a taxpayer, assessee, or other private party in a material way. (9) Under existing property tax law, if a taxpayer mistakenly pays property taxes on property that he or she does not own, the property tax is transferred to the property of the taxpayer for which the payment is intended. Existing property tax law requires the county tax collector, upon being convinced by substantial evidence of a mistake, to refund property taxes mistakenly paid in the case in which there is no property of the taxpayer to which the payment may be applied. Existing property tax law requires these actions to be taken at any time before a guaranty or certificate of title issues respecting the unintended property and before 2 years have elapsed since the date of payment. This bill would instead require a refund under these provisions to be made within 60 days of the county verifying that the payment was paid by mistake, or would subject the credit or refund to interest, as specified. By changing the manner in which county officials administer property tax refunds, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (10) Existing property tax law requires property taxes to be refunded if, among other circumstances, the taxes were paid on an assessment in excess of the equalized value of the property as determined by the county board of equalization and authorizes a county tax collector or county auditor to refund taxes within 4 years of payment if the amount paid exceeds the amount due on the property as shown on the roll. This bill would revise this requirement to apply if the taxes were paid on an assessment in excess of the value of the property as determined by the county assessment appeals board. The bill would revise the authorization to also apply if the amount paid exceeds the amount due by more than $10. By imposing new duties upon county officials with respect to the administration of property tax refunds, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (11) Under existing property tax law, a plaintiff is entitled to recover interest on penalties assessed for failure to file a property statement, as specified, in which recovery is allowed by the court, from the date of the filing of the claim for refund. This bill would correct an erroneous cross-reference in this provision. (12) The California Constitution requires that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (13) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 352, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2319.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2598.) Ordered to the Senate.

  8. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  9. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 17).

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

  12. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  15. Re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and REV. & TAX.

  16. Referred to Coms. on REV. & TAX. and L. GOV.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1064.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  19. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  20. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  21. Set for hearing May 16.

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 860.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  24. Set for hearing May 4.

  25. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  26. Read first time.

  27. From printer. May be acted upon on or after May 2.

  28. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Governance and Finance · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Governance and Finance

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37000
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 75002
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 78002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hall — Yea
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Allen — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lara — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonilla — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beall — Yea
Monning — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Logue — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Norby — Yea
Perea — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 1000
Unaffiliated 16000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Campos — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Norby — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Yee — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Evans — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 948 do?
(1) Existing property tax law provides that information and records in the assessor's office are not public documents and shall not be open to public inspection, except as specified. Existing law also requires the assessor to disclose certain appraisal information to specified state and local agencies. This bill would require the assessor, upon the written request of the tax collector, to provide to the tax collector information for the preparation and enforcement of tax sales, in accordance with specified procedures, and would require the tax collector to reimburse the assessor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the assessor for providing this information. The bill would require the tax collector to add those costs to the delinquent taxes and other costs, as specified. The bill would require the tax collector or his or her designated employee to certify specified declarations under penalty of perjury. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. By requiring new duties of local government officials with respect to providing property tax sales information, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing property tax law establishes a procedure by which an assessee of property taxes may pay taxes under protest in cases in which the assessor does not, upon or prior to completion of the local tax roll, send a notice to an assessee whose property was not on the prior year's secured roll, or to an assessee of real property on the local secured roll whose property's full value has increased. Under existing property tax law, a protest is required to be made by filing with the tax collector, together with the payment of the taxes or their first installment, a petition for assessment reduction on the form prescribed by the county board, which form the collector is to forward to the clerk of the county board with the notation that taxes were paid under protest. This bill would modify this procedure to instead require protests to be made by filing with the clerk of the county board a petition for assessment reduction on the form prescribed by the county board. The bill would also remove the requirement that protests be filed together with the payment of the taxes or their first installment and would make related technical and nonsubstantive changes. (3) Existing property tax law allows any county department, officer, or employee that is legally responsible for the collection of any amount owing the county to apply to the county board of supervisors for discharge of that responsibility on the grounds that the amount owed is too small to justify the costs of collection. This bill would revise that provision to authorize a discharge from accountability for the collection of the amount if performed in accordance with specified procedures. (4) Existing property tax law authorizes any tax collector charged with collecting any delinquent taxes on unsecured property to apply to the county board of supervisors for a discharge of the responsibility on the grounds that the amount is too small to justify the costs of collection. This bill would revise those provisions to authorize a county department, officer, or employee charged with that responsibility to apply for a discharge from accountability if performed in accordance with specified procedures. (5) Existing property tax law requires each county assessor to determine the assessed value of taxable real property and personal property, and requires each county tax collector to collect the taxes levied on those assessed values. Existing property tax law authorizes a county tax collector to sell tax-defaulted property after a specified amount of time. Existing property tax law also authorizes the tax collector, upon the recommendation of county counsel, to remove a parcel from a tax sale, as provided, and requires the tax collector to notify the Controller of that removal. This bill would eliminate the tax collector's notification requirement. (6) Existing property tax law generally authorizes a county tax collector to sell tax-defaulted property 5 years or more after that property has become tax defaulted. Existing law authorizes any party of interest in the property to file with the county a claim for the excess proceeds from the sale, at any time prior to the expiration of one year following the recordation of the tax collector's deed to the purchaser. Existing property tax law requires any person or entity that in any way acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to submit proof with the claim that the amount of excess proceeds has been disclosed to the party of interest, and that the party of interest has been advised of the right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on his or her own behalf. This bill would additionally require any person or entity that in any way acts on behalf of, or in place of, any party of interest with respect to filing a claim for any excess proceeds to submit proof with the claim that the source of the excess proceeds has been disclosed to the party of interest, and that the party of interest has been advised of the right to file a claim for the excess proceeds on his or her own behalf, as provided. (7) Existing property tax law requires a county to provide notice, including publishing notice in a newspaper, of the right to claim the excess proceeds from the sale of a tax-defaulted property. This bill would eliminate the requirement to publish the notice in a newspaper if the cost to publish is equal to or more than the excess proceeds from the sale. (8) Existing property tax law requires a tax collector to publish various publications within a specified time period, relating to, among other things, notice of impending default for failure to pay taxes on real property and notice of intended sale of tax-defaulted property by the tax collector. That law authorizes a publication to be republished, if any error or defect has been carried into any publication, made in the same manner as the original publication and for not less than one week. This bill would authorize, if the error or defect is discovered after the time required for the original publication, the publication to be republished within 60 days of the original time period required. This bill would require the republication to not adversely affect the right of a taxpayer, assessee, or other private party in a material way. (9) Under existing property tax law, if a taxpayer mistakenly pays property taxes on property that he or she does not own, the property tax is transferred to the property of the taxpayer for which the payment is intended. Existing property tax law requires the county tax collector, upon being convinced by substantial evidence of a mistake, to refund property taxes mistakenly paid in the case in which there is no property of the taxpayer to which the payment may be applied. Existing property tax law requires these actions to be taken at any time before a guaranty or certificate of title issues respecting the unintended property and before 2 years have elapsed since the date of payment. This bill would instead require a refund under these provisions to be made within 60 days of the county verifying that the payment was paid by mistake, or would subject the credit or refund to interest, as specified. By changing the manner in which county officials administer property tax refunds, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (10) Existing property tax law requires property taxes to be refunded if, among other circumstances, the taxes were paid on an assessment in excess of the equalized value of the property as determined by the county board of equalization and authorizes a county tax collector or county auditor to refund taxes within 4 years of payment if the amount paid exceeds the amount due on the property as shown on the roll. This bill would revise this requirement to apply if the taxes were paid on an assessment in excess of the value of the property as determined by the county assessment appeals board. The bill would revise the authorization to also apply if the amount paid exceeds the amount due by more than $10. By imposing new duties upon county officials with respect to the administration of property tax refunds, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (11) Under existing property tax law, a plaintiff is entitled to recover interest on penalties assessed for failure to file a property statement, as specified, in which recovery is allowed by the court, from the date of the filing of the claim for refund. This bill would correct an erroneous cross-reference in this provision. (12) The California Constitution requires that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (13) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Who sponsors SB 948?
SB 948 is sponsored by Committee on Governance and Finance.
What is the current status of SB 948?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 01, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 948?
Track SB 948 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 948

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 948

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →