SB 343 — Energy: efficiency.
Last action — Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law requires the PUC to investigate the ability of electrical corporation and gas corporations to provide energy efficiency financing options to their customers to implement a comprehensive program developed by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to include an assessment of each electrical corporation's and each gas corporation's implementation of that program in a specified triennial report required under existing law. Pursuant to this requirement, the PUC has opened Rulemaking 09-11-014. This bill would require the PUC, in Rulemaking 09-11-014, in consultation with the Energy Commission, the Treasurer, and the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, to determine appropriate energy efficiency financing measures, programs, and funding sources for the residential, commercial, and public building sectors in order to achieve the statewide energy efficiency goals for those sectors identified in the California Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan adopted by the PUC. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/12/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 12, 2011
- Amended 06/30/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 30, 2011
- Amended 06/22/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 22, 2011
- Amended 05/31/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 31, 2011
- Amended 05/10/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 10, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/15/11 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2011
- SB343 View text html
Action History
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (June 27).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 16. Page 1268.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 1115.) (May 26).
-
Set for hearing May 26.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 857.) (May 3).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- De León · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- De León
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 22% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 16 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 40% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 18% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 343 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law requires the PUC to investigate the ability of electrical corporation and gas corporations to provide energy efficiency financing options to their customers to implement a comprehensive program developed by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to include an assessment of each electrical corporation's and each gas corporation's implementation of that program in a specified triennial report required under existing law. Pursuant to this requirement, the PUC has opened Rulemaking 09-11-014. This bill would require the PUC, in Rulemaking 09-11-014, in consultation with the Energy Commission, the Treasurer, and the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, to determine appropriate energy efficiency financing measures, programs, and funding sources for the residential, commercial, and public building sectors in order to achieve the statewide energy efficiency goals for those sectors identified in the California Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan adopted by the PUC. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 343?
- SB 343 is sponsored by De León.
- What is the current status of SB 343?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 343?
- Track SB 343 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 343
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 343
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →