Commute benefit policies.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 582 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 582.
You're tracking SB 582
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 582 — Commute benefit policies.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires transportation planning agencies to undertake various transportation planning activities, including preparation of a regional transportation plan. Existing law requires transportation planning agencies that are designated under federal law as metropolitan planning organizations to include a sustainable communities strategy as part of the regional transportation plan for their region. Existing law creates air quality management districts and air pollution control districts with various responsibilities relative to reduction of air pollution. This bill, beginning on January 1, 2013, subject to certain exceptions, would authorize a metropolitan planning organization jointly with the local air quality management district or air pollution control district to adopt a commute benefit ordinance that requires covered employers operating within the common area of the organization and district with a specified number of covered employees to offer those employees certain commute benefits. The bill would require that the ordinance specify certain matters, including any consequences for noncompliance, and would impose a specified reporting requirement. The bill would provide for the 8 metropolitan planning organizations within the region served by a specified air district to adopt the ordinance only after the district first acts to adopt the ordinance. The bill would exclude from its provisions an air district with a trip reduction regulation initially adopted prior to the federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 as long as it continues to have a regulation that allows trip reduction as a method of compliance. The bill would make its provisions inoperative on January 1, 2017.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 07/15/11 - Enrolled Current pdf July 15, 2011
- Amended 07/07/11 - Amended Assembly pdf July 07, 2011
- Amended 06/22/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 22, 2011
- Amended 06/14/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 14, 2011
- Amended 05/17/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 17, 2011
- Amended 05/05/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 05, 2011
- Amended 04/28/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 28, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Amended 03/29/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 29, 2011
- Introduced 02/17/11 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2011
- SB582 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 1863.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 28. Page 2252.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Page 2229.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 20).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 1171.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 930.) (May 9).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Set for hearing May 9.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 766.) (April 26).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Set for hearing April 5.
-
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and E.Q.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Yee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Yee
Co-sponsors (1)
- Hill
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 35% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 26 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 28 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 35% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 5% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 582 do?
- Existing law requires transportation planning agencies to undertake various transportation planning activities, including preparation of a regional transportation plan. Existing law requires transportation planning agencies that are designated under federal law as metropolitan planning organizations to include a sustainable communities strategy as part of the regional transportation plan for their region. Existing law creates air quality management districts and air pollution control districts with various responsibilities relative to reduction of air pollution. This bill, beginning on January 1, 2013, subject to certain exceptions, would authorize a metropolitan planning organization jointly with the local air quality management district or air pollution control district to adopt a commute benefit ordinance that requires covered employers operating within the common area of the organization and district with a specified number of covered employees to offer those employees certain commute benefits. The bill would require that the ordinance specify certain matters, including any consequences for noncompliance, and would impose a specified reporting requirement. The bill would provide for the 8 metropolitan planning organizations within the region served by a specified air district to adopt the ordinance only after the district first acts to adopt the ordinance. The bill would exclude from its provisions an air district with a trip reduction regulation initially adopted prior to the federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 as long as it continues to have a regulation that allows trip reduction as a method of compliance. The bill would make its provisions inoperative on January 1, 2017.
- Who sponsors SB 582?
- SB 582 is sponsored by Hill and Yee.
- What is the current status of SB 582?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 582?
- Track SB 582 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 582
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 582
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →