SB 449 — Controller: local agency financial review.
Last action — Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires certain local agencies to furnish reports to the Controller concerning financial transactions of the local agency, subject to uniform accounting and reporting procedures prescribed by the Controller. The Controller may provide for the investigation of certain local agency finances if a report is not made in the time, form, and manner required or there is reason to believe that a report is false, incomplete, or incorrect. This bill would additionally authorize the Controller, if the Controller determines that sufficient funds are made available, to conduct a preliminary review to determine the existence of a local agency financial problem, and perform an audit upon completion of that review, subject to specified criteria. The bill would require the Controller, if the Controller determines that sufficient funds are made available, to convene a local agency financial review committee with a specified membership, and authorize the committee to recommend a financial recovery plan for a local agency requesting assistance. It would require the Controller to report to the Legislature annually on the actions of the committee and the status of all engagements with local agencies pursuant to these provisions. The bill would specify that its provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2017.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/20/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 20, 2011
- Amended 05/19/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 19, 2011
- Amended 05/17/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 17, 2011
- Amended 04/26/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 26, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Amended 04/07/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 07, 2011
- Amended 03/30/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 30, 2011
- Introduced 02/16/11 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2011
- SB449 View text html
Action History
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 1227.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1117.) (May 26).
-
Set for hearing May 26.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 558.) (April 6).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Set for hearing April 6.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Total | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 11% | 22% | 0% | 67% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 23% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 449 do?
- Existing law requires certain local agencies to furnish reports to the Controller concerning financial transactions of the local agency, subject to uniform accounting and reporting procedures prescribed by the Controller. The Controller may provide for the investigation of certain local agency finances if a report is not made in the time, form, and manner required or there is reason to believe that a report is false, incomplete, or incorrect. This bill would additionally authorize the Controller, if the Controller determines that sufficient funds are made available, to conduct a preliminary review to determine the existence of a local agency financial problem, and perform an audit upon completion of that review, subject to specified criteria. The bill would require the Controller, if the Controller determines that sufficient funds are made available, to convene a local agency financial review committee with a specified membership, and authorize the committee to recommend a financial recovery plan for a local agency requesting assistance. It would require the Controller to report to the Legislature annually on the actions of the committee and the status of all engagements with local agencies pursuant to these provisions. The bill would specify that its provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2017.
- Who sponsors SB 449?
- SB 449 is sponsored by Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 449?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 449?
- Track SB 449 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 449
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 449
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →