AB 2099 — Public employees: annuities and mutual fund custodial accounts.
Last action — Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law prohibits state and local agencies from negotiating life and disability insurance or requiring the placing of that insurance through particular agents, brokers, or companies, except to the extent that the state has a direct financial interest in the subject of the insurance, as specified. Existing law excepts from these provisions a tax-sheltered annuity under an annuity plan that meets the requirements of Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to be placed or purchased for an employee, as specified. Existing law requires an annuity contract and custodial account as described in Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to be offered to all employees of any state agency who are members of the State Teachers' Retirement Plan, any employee of a local public agency or political subdivision of the state that employs persons to perform creditable service subject to coverage by the plan, and eligible state employees of a state employer under the uniform state payroll system, excluding the California State University System. The Teachers' Retirement Law provides a registration process for information relating to tax-deferred retirement investment products. This bill, until January 1, 2018, would authorize a pilot project that would allow the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Los Angeles Community College District to select specific 403(b) products offered by 4 or more vendors of tax-deferred retirement investment products described in Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code or establish a list of preferred vendors that are recommended to employees, through a due diligence and competitive review process, as specified. The bill would make a related statement of legislative intent.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/24/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 24, 2012
- Introduced 02/23/12 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2012
- AB2099 View text html
Action History
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 13).
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 4764.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 28).
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cedillo · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cedillo
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 23 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 50 | 25 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 31% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2099 do?
- Existing law prohibits state and local agencies from negotiating life and disability insurance or requiring the placing of that insurance through particular agents, brokers, or companies, except to the extent that the state has a direct financial interest in the subject of the insurance, as specified. Existing law excepts from these provisions a tax-sheltered annuity under an annuity plan that meets the requirements of Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to be placed or purchased for an employee, as specified. Existing law requires an annuity contract and custodial account as described in Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to be offered to all employees of any state agency who are members of the State Teachers' Retirement Plan, any employee of a local public agency or political subdivision of the state that employs persons to perform creditable service subject to coverage by the plan, and eligible state employees of a state employer under the uniform state payroll system, excluding the California State University System. The Teachers' Retirement Law provides a registration process for information relating to tax-deferred retirement investment products. This bill, until January 1, 2018, would authorize a pilot project that would allow the Los Angeles Unified School District and the Los Angeles Community College District to select specific 403(b) products offered by 4 or more vendors of tax-deferred retirement investment products described in Section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code or establish a list of preferred vendors that are recommended to employees, through a due diligence and competitive review process, as specified. The bill would make a related statement of legislative intent.
- Who sponsors AB 2099?
- AB 2099 is sponsored by Cedillo.
- What is the current status of AB 2099?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2099?
- Track AB 2099 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2099
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2099
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →