California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 105 — Public safety: snow sport helmets.

Last action — Veto sustained.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires a person under 18 years of age to wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet while operating a bicycle or riding upon a bicycle as a passenger upon the streets or any other public bicycle path. This bill would require a person under 18 years of age to wear a properly fitted and fastened snow sport helmet while operating snow skis or a snowboard, or while riding upon a seat or other device that is attached to the snow skis or a snowboard, while participating in the sport of downhill skiing or snowboarding. The bill would impose a $25 fine for a violation of this requirement. Because this bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would specify that nothing in those provisions shall be construed to increase or decrease duties imposed under existing law. The bill would also specify that those provisions shall not apply to Nordic skiing. The bill would require a ski resort to post signs at the resort giving reasonable notice of the snow sport helmet requirement and the fine for a violation of that requirement. The bill also would require a ski resort to provide prominent written notice of the snow sport helmet requirement on all trail maps and resort Internet Web sites. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Veto sustained.

  2. Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

  3. In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  4. Vetoed by the Governor.

  5. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.

  6. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 5. Page 1913.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  7. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  8. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 2255.) Ordered to the Senate.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (July 6).

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 21).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  14. Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.

  15. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  16. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 6. Page 706.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  17. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.

  19. Set for hearing April 11.

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 452.) (March 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  22. Set for hearing March 23.

  23. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  24. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 13.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alquist · Cosponsor
  • Dickinson · Cosponsor
  • Ma · Cosponsor
  • Williams · Cosponsor
  • Yee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Yee

Co-sponsors (4)

  • Alquist
  • Dickinson
  • Ma
  • Williams

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 31 Yea · 5 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29503
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 31504
% of votes cast 78%13%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Evans — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Yea
Leno — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 53 Yea · 24 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 522203
Democratic 1000
Republican 0200
Total 532403
% of votes cast 66%30%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fong — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gordon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Conway — Nay
Beall — Not Voting
Cook — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11401
Democratic 1000
Total 12401
% of votes cast 71%24%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Norby — Nay
Wagner — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13006
Total 13006
% of votes cast 68%0%0%32%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Eng — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Mansoor — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 32 Yea · 6 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29602
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 32602
% of votes cast 80%15%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Yee — Yea
Evans — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Runner — Nay
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 105 do?
Existing law requires a person under 18 years of age to wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet while operating a bicycle or riding upon a bicycle as a passenger upon the streets or any other public bicycle path. This bill would require a person under 18 years of age to wear a properly fitted and fastened snow sport helmet while operating snow skis or a snowboard, or while riding upon a seat or other device that is attached to the snow skis or a snowboard, while participating in the sport of downhill skiing or snowboarding. The bill would impose a $25 fine for a violation of this requirement. Because this bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would specify that nothing in those provisions shall be construed to increase or decrease duties imposed under existing law. The bill would also specify that those provisions shall not apply to Nordic skiing. The bill would require a ski resort to post signs at the resort giving reasonable notice of the snow sport helmet requirement and the fine for a violation of that requirement. The bill also would require a ski resort to provide prominent written notice of the snow sport helmet requirement on all trail maps and resort Internet Web sites. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 105?
SB 105 is sponsored by Alquist, Dickinson, Ma, Williams, and Yee.
What is the current status of SB 105?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 105?
Track SB 105 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 105

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 105

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →