Dental coverage: noncontracting providers: assignment of benefits.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1579 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1579.
You're tracking AB 1579
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1579 — Dental coverage: noncontracting providers: assignment of benefits.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law authorizes licensed nonphysician providers that contract with a medical group, physician, or independent practice association to provide services to health care service plan enrollees to directly bill the plan for services rendered under certain circumstances. Existing law requires group health care service plans to authorize and permit assignment of a Medi-Cal beneficiary's right to reimbursement for covered services to the State Department of Health Care Services, except as specified. Existing law provides for the direct payment of group insurance medical benefits by a health insurer to the person or persons furnishing or paying for hospitalization or medical or surgical aid, as specified. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer that pays a contracting dental provider directly for covered services rendered to an enrollee or insured to also pay a noncontracting dental provider directly for covered services rendered to an enrollee or insured where the provider submits a written assignment of benefits signed by the enrollee or insured or the legal representative thereof, as specified. The bill would specify that a plan or insurer's payment pursuant to this provision discharges the plan or insurer's obligation with respect to the amount paid. The bill would also require a noncontracting dental provider to disclose to the enrollee or insured or the legal representative thereof that the provider is a noncontracting provider prior to accepting an assignment of benefits, and to provide additional specified written notices to the enrollee or insured or the legal representative thereof, including a written notice of the estimated full cost of the planned treatment and the estimated amount of those costs payable by the enrollee or insured. The bill would also prohibit a provider from collecting from an enrollee or insured any amount over the enrollee's or insured's estimated cost, and would require the provider to refund any overpayment to the enrollee or insured. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/23/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 23, 2012
- Amended 03/20/12 - Amended Assembly pdf March 20, 2012
- Introduced 02/02/12 - Introduced pdf February 02, 2012
- AB1579 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 4822.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 9).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Campos · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Campos
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 1% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Atkins | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1579 do?
- Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law authorizes licensed nonphysician providers that contract with a medical group, physician, or independent practice association to provide services to health care service plan enrollees to directly bill the plan for services rendered under certain circumstances. Existing law requires group health care service plans to authorize and permit assignment of a Medi-Cal beneficiary's right to reimbursement for covered services to the State Department of Health Care Services, except as specified. Existing law provides for the direct payment of group insurance medical benefits by a health insurer to the person or persons furnishing or paying for hospitalization or medical or surgical aid, as specified. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer that pays a contracting dental provider directly for covered services rendered to an enrollee or insured to also pay a noncontracting dental provider directly for covered services rendered to an enrollee or insured where the provider submits a written assignment of benefits signed by the enrollee or insured or the legal representative thereof, as specified. The bill would specify that a plan or insurer's payment pursuant to this provision discharges the plan or insurer's obligation with respect to the amount paid. The bill would also require a noncontracting dental provider to disclose to the enrollee or insured or the legal representative thereof that the provider is a noncontracting provider prior to accepting an assignment of benefits, and to provide additional specified written notices to the enrollee or insured or the legal representative thereof, including a written notice of the estimated full cost of the planned treatment and the estimated amount of those costs payable by the enrollee or insured. The bill would also prohibit a provider from collecting from an enrollee or insured any amount over the enrollee's or insured's estimated cost, and would require the provider to refund any overpayment to the enrollee or insured. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1579?
- AB 1579 is sponsored by Campos.
- What is the current status of AB 1579?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1579?
- Track AB 1579 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1579
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1579
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →