AB 1066 — Public health care: Medi-Cal: demonstration project waivers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 86, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, which revises hospital supplemental payment methodologies under the Medi-Cal program in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and to stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals that provide care to Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured patients. This demonstration project provides for funding, in supplementation of Medi-Cal reimbursement, to various hospitals, including designated public hospitals, nondesignated public hospitals, and private hospitals, as defined, in accordance with certain provisions relating to disproportionate share hospitals. Existing law requires the department to seek another demonstration project or federal waiver of Medicaid law to implement specified objectives, which may include better care coordination for seniors, persons with disabilities, and children with special health care needs. Existing law provides that to the extent the provisions under the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act do not conflict with the provisions of, or the Special Terms and Conditions of, this demonstration project, the provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act shall apply. Existing law establishes the following continuously appropriated funds to be expended by the department: (1) The Demonstration Disproportionate Share Hospital Fund, which consists of federal funds claimed and received by the department as federal financial participation with respect to certified public expenditures. (2) The Health Care Support Fund, which consists of safety net care pool funds claimed and received by the department under the demonstration projects. (3) The Private Hospital Supplemental Fund, the Nondesignated Public Hospital Supplemental Fund, and the Distressed Hospital Fund, which consist of moneys from various sources, and are used as the source of the nonfederal share of payments to private hospitals, nondesignated hospitals, and distressed hospitals, respectively. (4) The Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund, which consists of moneys that a county, other political subdivision of the state, or other governmental entity in the state elects to transfer to the department for use as the nonfederal share of investment, improvement, and incentive payments to participating designated hospitals and the governmental entities with which they are affiliated. (5) The Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, which consists of moneys transferred to the fund and used as the nonfederal share of payment adjustments made to hospitals under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would further distinguish which provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act apply to the successor demonstration project, as defined, and would make other conforming changes. By extending the term of some of the continuously appropriated funds, this bill would make an appropriation. By revising the purposes for which moneys in the Health Care Support Fund and moneys in the Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund shall be used, this bill would make an appropriation. By extending the period of time during which transfers are made to the continuously appropriated Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law provides for the Health Care Coverage Initiative, which is a federal waiver demonstration project established to expand health care coverage to low-income uninsured individuals who are not currently eligible for the Medi-Cal program, the Healthy Families Program, or the Access for Infants and Mothers program. Existing law also, to the extent that federal financial participation is available and federal financial participation is not jeopardized, requires the department, on or after November 1, 2010, but no later than March 1, 2011, or 180 days after federal approval of a successor demonstration project, as defined, to authorize local Coverage Expansion and Enrollment Demonstration (CEED) projects, as specified, to provide scheduled health care benefits for uninsured adults 19 to 64 years of age, inclusive, with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level who are not otherwise eligible for Medi-Cal or Medicare. Existing law also provides that, to the extent federal financial participation is made available under the Special Terms and Conditions of the demonstration project, CEED project services may be made available to individuals with incomes between 134% to 200%, inclusive, of the federal poverty level. This bill would rename a CEED project a Low Income Health Program (LIHP) and would instead provide that the department shall authorize local LIHPs no later than July 1, 2011. This bill would also provide that LIHP health care services may be provided to eligible individuals, as described, including those with incomes above 133% through 200% of the federal poverty level. This bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/15/11 - Chaptered Current pdf July 15, 2011
- Enrolled 07/08/11 - Enrolled pdf July 08, 2011
- Amended 06/15/11 - Amended Senate pdf June 15, 2011
- Amended 05/31/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 31, 2011
- Amended 04/04/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 04, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1066 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 86, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:45 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 2227.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1713.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 27).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 1352.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Monning · Cosponsor
- V. Manuel Pérez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
- Monning
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 72 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De León | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 70 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1066 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, which revises hospital supplemental payment methodologies under the Medi-Cal program in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and to stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals that provide care to Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured patients. This demonstration project provides for funding, in supplementation of Medi-Cal reimbursement, to various hospitals, including designated public hospitals, nondesignated public hospitals, and private hospitals, as defined, in accordance with certain provisions relating to disproportionate share hospitals. Existing law requires the department to seek another demonstration project or federal waiver of Medicaid law to implement specified objectives, which may include better care coordination for seniors, persons with disabilities, and children with special health care needs. Existing law provides that to the extent the provisions under the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act do not conflict with the provisions of, or the Special Terms and Conditions of, this demonstration project, the provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act shall apply. Existing law establishes the following continuously appropriated funds to be expended by the department: (1) The Demonstration Disproportionate Share Hospital Fund, which consists of federal funds claimed and received by the department as federal financial participation with respect to certified public expenditures. (2) The Health Care Support Fund, which consists of safety net care pool funds claimed and received by the department under the demonstration projects. (3) The Private Hospital Supplemental Fund, the Nondesignated Public Hospital Supplemental Fund, and the Distressed Hospital Fund, which consist of moneys from various sources, and are used as the source of the nonfederal share of payments to private hospitals, nondesignated hospitals, and distressed hospitals, respectively. (4) The Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund, which consists of moneys that a county, other political subdivision of the state, or other governmental entity in the state elects to transfer to the department for use as the nonfederal share of investment, improvement, and incentive payments to participating designated hospitals and the governmental entities with which they are affiliated. (5) The Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, which consists of moneys transferred to the fund and used as the nonfederal share of payment adjustments made to hospitals under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would further distinguish which provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act apply to the successor demonstration project, as defined, and would make other conforming changes. By extending the term of some of the continuously appropriated funds, this bill would make an appropriation. By revising the purposes for which moneys in the Health Care Support Fund and moneys in the Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund shall be used, this bill would make an appropriation. By extending the period of time during which transfers are made to the continuously appropriated Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law provides for the Health Care Coverage Initiative, which is a federal waiver demonstration project established to expand health care coverage to low-income uninsured individuals who are not currently eligible for the Medi-Cal program, the Healthy Families Program, or the Access for Infants and Mothers program. Existing law also, to the extent that federal financial participation is available and federal financial participation is not jeopardized, requires the department, on or after November 1, 2010, but no later than March 1, 2011, or 180 days after federal approval of a successor demonstration project, as defined, to authorize local Coverage Expansion and Enrollment Demonstration (CEED) projects, as specified, to provide scheduled health care benefits for uninsured adults 19 to 64 years of age, inclusive, with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level who are not otherwise eligible for Medi-Cal or Medicare. Existing law also provides that, to the extent federal financial participation is made available under the Special Terms and Conditions of the demonstration project, CEED project services may be made available to individuals with incomes between 134% to 200%, inclusive, of the federal poverty level. This bill would rename a CEED project a Low Income Health Program (LIHP) and would instead provide that the department shall authorize local LIHPs no later than July 1, 2011. This bill would also provide that LIHP health care services may be provided to eligible individuals, as described, including those with incomes above 133% through 200% of the federal poverty level. This bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1066?
- AB 1066 is sponsored by Monning and V. Manuel Pérez.
- What is the current status of AB 1066?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1066?
- Track AB 1066 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1066
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1066
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →