California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1066 — Public health care: Medi-Cal: demonstration project waivers.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 86, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, which revises hospital supplemental payment methodologies under the Medi-Cal program in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and to stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals that provide care to Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured patients. This demonstration project provides for funding, in supplementation of Medi-Cal reimbursement, to various hospitals, including designated public hospitals, nondesignated public hospitals, and private hospitals, as defined, in accordance with certain provisions relating to disproportionate share hospitals. Existing law requires the department to seek another demonstration project or federal waiver of Medicaid law to implement specified objectives, which may include better care coordination for seniors, persons with disabilities, and children with special health care needs. Existing law provides that to the extent the provisions under the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act do not conflict with the provisions of, or the Special Terms and Conditions of, this demonstration project, the provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act shall apply. Existing law establishes the following continuously appropriated funds to be expended by the department: (1) The Demonstration Disproportionate Share Hospital Fund, which consists of federal funds claimed and received by the department as federal financial participation with respect to certified public expenditures. (2) The Health Care Support Fund, which consists of safety net care pool funds claimed and received by the department under the demonstration projects. (3) The Private Hospital Supplemental Fund, the Nondesignated Public Hospital Supplemental Fund, and the Distressed Hospital Fund, which consist of moneys from various sources, and are used as the source of the nonfederal share of payments to private hospitals, nondesignated hospitals, and distressed hospitals, respectively. (4) The Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund, which consists of moneys that a county, other political subdivision of the state, or other governmental entity in the state elects to transfer to the department for use as the nonfederal share of investment, improvement, and incentive payments to participating designated hospitals and the governmental entities with which they are affiliated. (5) The Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, which consists of moneys transferred to the fund and used as the nonfederal share of payment adjustments made to hospitals under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would further distinguish which provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act apply to the successor demonstration project, as defined, and would make other conforming changes. By extending the term of some of the continuously appropriated funds, this bill would make an appropriation. By revising the purposes for which moneys in the Health Care Support Fund and moneys in the Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund shall be used, this bill would make an appropriation. By extending the period of time during which transfers are made to the continuously appropriated Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law provides for the Health Care Coverage Initiative, which is a federal waiver demonstration project established to expand health care coverage to low-income uninsured individuals who are not currently eligible for the Medi-Cal program, the Healthy Families Program, or the Access for Infants and Mothers program. Existing law also, to the extent that federal financial participation is available and federal financial participation is not jeopardized, requires the department, on or after November 1, 2010, but no later than March 1, 2011, or 180 days after federal approval of a successor demonstration project, as defined, to authorize local Coverage Expansion and Enrollment Demonstration (CEED) projects, as specified, to provide scheduled health care benefits for uninsured adults 19 to 64 years of age, inclusive, with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level who are not otherwise eligible for Medi-Cal or Medicare. Existing law also provides that, to the extent federal financial participation is made available under the Special Terms and Conditions of the demonstration project, CEED project services may be made available to individuals with incomes between 134% to 200%, inclusive, of the federal poverty level. This bill would rename a CEED project a Low Income Health Program (LIHP) and would instead provide that the department shall authorize local LIHPs no later than July 1, 2011. This bill would also provide that LIHP health care services may be provided to eligible individuals, as described, including those with incomes above 133% through 200% of the federal poverty level. This bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 86, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:45 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 2227.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1713.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 27).

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  14. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 1352.).

  17. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  18. From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4).

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  22. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  23. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  24. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 72 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70007
Republican 2000
Democratic 0001
Total 72008
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Butler — Yea
Fong — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Huber — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Conway — Yea
Ma — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Beall — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Eng — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Mansoor — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Silva — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cook — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Harman — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Price — Yea
Wright — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Correa — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Leno — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8001
Total 8001
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 70 Yea · 0 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 650010
Democratic 3000
Republican 2000
Total 700010
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cook — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Portantino — Not Voting
Mitchell — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lara — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Lara — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18001
Total 18001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Pan — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Monning — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1066 do?
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, which revises hospital supplemental payment methodologies under the Medi-Cal program in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and to stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals that provide care to Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured patients. This demonstration project provides for funding, in supplementation of Medi-Cal reimbursement, to various hospitals, including designated public hospitals, nondesignated public hospitals, and private hospitals, as defined, in accordance with certain provisions relating to disproportionate share hospitals. Existing law requires the department to seek another demonstration project or federal waiver of Medicaid law to implement specified objectives, which may include better care coordination for seniors, persons with disabilities, and children with special health care needs. Existing law provides that to the extent the provisions under the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act do not conflict with the provisions of, or the Special Terms and Conditions of, this demonstration project, the provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act shall apply. Existing law establishes the following continuously appropriated funds to be expended by the department: (1) The Demonstration Disproportionate Share Hospital Fund, which consists of federal funds claimed and received by the department as federal financial participation with respect to certified public expenditures. (2) The Health Care Support Fund, which consists of safety net care pool funds claimed and received by the department under the demonstration projects. (3) The Private Hospital Supplemental Fund, the Nondesignated Public Hospital Supplemental Fund, and the Distressed Hospital Fund, which consist of moneys from various sources, and are used as the source of the nonfederal share of payments to private hospitals, nondesignated hospitals, and distressed hospitals, respectively. (4) The Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund, which consists of moneys that a county, other political subdivision of the state, or other governmental entity in the state elects to transfer to the department for use as the nonfederal share of investment, improvement, and incentive payments to participating designated hospitals and the governmental entities with which they are affiliated. (5) The Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, which consists of moneys transferred to the fund and used as the nonfederal share of payment adjustments made to hospitals under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would further distinguish which provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act apply to the successor demonstration project, as defined, and would make other conforming changes. By extending the term of some of the continuously appropriated funds, this bill would make an appropriation. By revising the purposes for which moneys in the Health Care Support Fund and moneys in the Public Hospital Investment, Improvement, and Incentive Fund shall be used, this bill would make an appropriation. By extending the period of time during which transfers are made to the continuously appropriated Medi-Cal Inpatient Payment Adjustment Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law provides for the Health Care Coverage Initiative, which is a federal waiver demonstration project established to expand health care coverage to low-income uninsured individuals who are not currently eligible for the Medi-Cal program, the Healthy Families Program, or the Access for Infants and Mothers program. Existing law also, to the extent that federal financial participation is available and federal financial participation is not jeopardized, requires the department, on or after November 1, 2010, but no later than March 1, 2011, or 180 days after federal approval of a successor demonstration project, as defined, to authorize local Coverage Expansion and Enrollment Demonstration (CEED) projects, as specified, to provide scheduled health care benefits for uninsured adults 19 to 64 years of age, inclusive, with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level who are not otherwise eligible for Medi-Cal or Medicare. Existing law also provides that, to the extent federal financial participation is made available under the Special Terms and Conditions of the demonstration project, CEED project services may be made available to individuals with incomes between 134% to 200%, inclusive, of the federal poverty level. This bill would rename a CEED project a Low Income Health Program (LIHP) and would instead provide that the department shall authorize local LIHPs no later than July 1, 2011. This bill would also provide that LIHP health care services may be provided to eligible individuals, as described, including those with incomes above 133% through 200% of the federal poverty level. This bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 1066?
AB 1066 is sponsored by Monning and V. Manuel Pérez.
What is the current status of AB 1066?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1066?
Track AB 1066 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1066

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1066

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →