Civil procedure: orders.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1067 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1067.
You're tracking AB 1067
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1067 — Civil procedure: orders.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 78, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides that when an application for an order has been made to a judge, or to a court, and refused in whole or in part, or granted, or granted conditionally, or on terms, any party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order. This bill would provide that an order denying a motion for reconsideration made pursuant to the provision described above is not separately appealable. The bill would provide, however, that if the order that was the subject of the motion for reconsideration is appealable, the denial of the motion for reconsideration is reviewable as part of an appeal from that order.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/12/11 - Chaptered Current pdf July 12, 2011
- Enrolled 06/28/11 - Enrolled pdf June 28, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1067 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 78, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:15 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1574.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 14).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1179.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 26).
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Huber · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Huber
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1067 do?
- Existing law provides that when an application for an order has been made to a judge, or to a court, and refused in whole or in part, or granted, or granted conditionally, or on terms, any party affected by the order may, within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order. This bill would provide that an order denying a motion for reconsideration made pursuant to the provision described above is not separately appealable. The bill would provide, however, that if the order that was the subject of the motion for reconsideration is appealable, the denial of the motion for reconsideration is reviewable as part of an appeal from that order.
- Who sponsors AB 1067?
- AB 1067 is sponsored by Huber.
- What is the current status of AB 1067?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1067?
- Track AB 1067 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1067
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1067
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →