California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 314 — Property taxation: welfare exemption: leased property: City of San Diego: Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego.

Last action — Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing property tax law, in accordance with the California Constitution, provides for a "welfare exemption" for property that is used exclusively for religious, hospital, scientific, or charitable purposes and that is owned or operated by certain types of nonprofit entities if certain qualifying criteria are met. This bill would provide that property used exclusively for charitable purposes and located within the former Naval Training Center in San Diego and leased by the City of San Diego or the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego to a nonprofit entity or to an entity controlled by the nonprofit entity shall be deemed to be included within the welfare exemption and shall be entitled to a partial exemption, as specified, in any year in which the development of the property is being financed with funds made available through specified federal tax credit programs. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute. By imposing new duties upon local tax officials with respect to the welfare exemption, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee.

  2. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

  3. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. Hearing postponed by committee.

  5. Hearing postponed by committee.

  6. Referred to Coms. on REV. & TAX. and APPR.

  7. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  8. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1068.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  9. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 949.) (May 11).

  12. Set for hearing May 11.

  13. Hearing postponed by committee.

  14. Set for hearing May 4.

  15. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.

  19. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Vargas · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Vargas

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Special Consent #3

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Cannella — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Fuller — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Liu — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
La Malfa — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 314 do?
Existing property tax law, in accordance with the California Constitution, provides for a "welfare exemption" for property that is used exclusively for religious, hospital, scientific, or charitable purposes and that is owned or operated by certain types of nonprofit entities if certain qualifying criteria are met. This bill would provide that property used exclusively for charitable purposes and located within the former Naval Training Center in San Diego and leased by the City of San Diego or the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego to a nonprofit entity or to an entity controlled by the nonprofit entity shall be deemed to be included within the welfare exemption and shall be entitled to a partial exemption, as specified, in any year in which the development of the property is being financed with funds made available through specified federal tax credit programs. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute. By imposing new duties upon local tax officials with respect to the welfare exemption, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Who sponsors SB 314?
SB 314 is sponsored by Vargas.
What is the current status of SB 314?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 314?
Track SB 314 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 314

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 314

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →