SB 73 — Health and human services.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 34, Statutes of 2011.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, authorizes the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. This bill would, if a specified provision of the Budget Act of 2011 is operative, state the intent of the Legislature for the department to identify up to $100 million in General Fund savings from the developmental services system, as prescribed. This bill would authorize the department to utilize input from prescribed workgroups. This bill would require, as prescribed, the department to report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee within 10 days of the specified reduction as directed within the Budget Act of 2011. (2) Existing law provides for the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which, either through employment by the recipient, or by or through contract by the county, qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons receive services enabling them to remain in their own homes. Counties are responsible for the administration of the IHSS program. Under the Medi-Cal program, similar services are provided to eligible individuals, with these services known as personal care option services. Existing law authorized an individual who was eligible for IHSS services in the 1992–93 fiscal year, and who had his or her services reduced pursuant to specified provisions, but who believed that he or she was at serious risk of out-of-home placement unless all or part of the reduced hours were restored, to apply for an IHSS Care Supplement, as prescribed. Existing law established a similar reduction in authorized IHSS service hours, which becomes operative only if a specified medication machine pilot project does not achieve a designated amount of savings to the General Fund, as determined by the Department of Finance, and also authorizes an individual whose services have been reduced, and who believes that he or she is at serious risk of out-of-home placement, to submit an IHSS Care Supplement application, in accordance with specified provisions, in order to have all or part of the service hour reduction restored. Existing law also requires the department to implement a 3.6% reduction in service hours to each IHSS recipient, until July 1, 2012. This bill, effective January 1, 2012, would impose an additional 20% service hour reduction on IHSS recipients, which would be operative only if a designated provision of the Budget Act of 2011 becomes operative, and would establish an IHSS Care Supplement process for any individual who is notified of a reduction in service hours under the bill, but who believes he or she is at serious risk of out-of-home placement unless all or part of the reduction is restored. (3) Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, effective on or after January 1, 2012, if a specified provision of the Budget Act of 2011 is operative, apply specified payment reductions to managed care health plans that contract with the department and to other specified contracts. (4) This bill would appropriate $1,000 to the State Department of Health Care Services for administration. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/30/11 - Chaptered Current pdf June 30, 2011
- Enrolled 06/28/11 - Enrolled pdf June 28, 2011
- Amended 06/28/11 - Amended Assembly pdf June 28, 2011
- Amended 03/25/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 25, 2011
- Amended 03/14/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 14, 2011
- Introduced 01/10/11 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2011
- SB73 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 34, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 9:50 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 17. Page 1617.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 2095.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Page 2092.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 2. Page 165.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 35% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 5% | 0% | 37% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 73 do?
- (1) Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, authorizes the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. This bill would, if a specified provision of the Budget Act of 2011 is operative, state the intent of the Legislature for the department to identify up to $100 million in General Fund savings from the developmental services system, as prescribed. This bill would authorize the department to utilize input from prescribed workgroups. This bill would require, as prescribed, the department to report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee within 10 days of the specified reduction as directed within the Budget Act of 2011. (2) Existing law provides for the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which, either through employment by the recipient, or by or through contract by the county, qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons receive services enabling them to remain in their own homes. Counties are responsible for the administration of the IHSS program. Under the Medi-Cal program, similar services are provided to eligible individuals, with these services known as personal care option services. Existing law authorized an individual who was eligible for IHSS services in the 1992–93 fiscal year, and who had his or her services reduced pursuant to specified provisions, but who believed that he or she was at serious risk of out-of-home placement unless all or part of the reduced hours were restored, to apply for an IHSS Care Supplement, as prescribed. Existing law established a similar reduction in authorized IHSS service hours, which becomes operative only if a specified medication machine pilot project does not achieve a designated amount of savings to the General Fund, as determined by the Department of Finance, and also authorizes an individual whose services have been reduced, and who believes that he or she is at serious risk of out-of-home placement, to submit an IHSS Care Supplement application, in accordance with specified provisions, in order to have all or part of the service hour reduction restored. Existing law also requires the department to implement a 3.6% reduction in service hours to each IHSS recipient, until July 1, 2012. This bill, effective January 1, 2012, would impose an additional 20% service hour reduction on IHSS recipients, which would be operative only if a designated provision of the Budget Act of 2011 becomes operative, and would establish an IHSS Care Supplement process for any individual who is notified of a reduction in service hours under the bill, but who believes he or she is at serious risk of out-of-home placement unless all or part of the reduction is restored. (3) Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, effective on or after January 1, 2012, if a specified provision of the Budget Act of 2011 is operative, apply specified payment reductions to managed care health plans that contract with the department and to other specified contracts. (4) This bill would appropriate $1,000 to the State Department of Health Care Services for administration. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 73?
- SB 73 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 73?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 73?
- Track SB 73 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 73
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 73
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →