Vehicles: public transit buses: illuminated signs.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2375 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2375.
You're tracking AB 2375
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2375 — Vehicles: public transit buses: illuminated signs.
Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a bus operated by a publicly owned transit system on regularly scheduled service to be equipped with illuminated signs that display information directly related to public service and include, among other things, destination signs, route-number signs, run-number signs, public service announcement signs, or a combination of those signs, visible from any direction of the vehicle, that emit any light color, other than the color red emitted from forward-facing signs, pursuant to specified conditions. Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2017, a pilot program that allows up to 25 buses operated by the City of Santa Monica's publicly owned transit system for the first 2 years of the pilot program, and up to 30 buses thereafter, to be equipped with illuminated signs that display advertising subject to certain conditions, including a display area of not greater than 4,464 square inches. This bill would require the Antelope Valley Transit Authority on or before March 1, 2013, if it elects to implement the pilot program authorized by the bill, to determine whether the City of Santa Monica has at least one transit bus equipped with illuminated signs that is operational pursuant to the pilot program authorized under existing law. If the Antelope Valley Transit Authority determines that the City of Santa Monica does have such a transit bus, the bill would prohibit the Antelope Valley Transit Authority from implementing the bill's pilot program. If the Antelope Valley Transit Authority determines that the City of Santa Monica does not have such a bus, the Antelope Valley Transit Authority would be authorized to implement the bill's pilot program. The bill would authorize, until January 1, 2018, a pilot program that would allow up to 25 buses operated by the Antelope Valley Transit Authority's publicly owned transit system for the first 2 years of the pilot program, and up to 30 buses thereafter, to be equipped with illuminated signs that display advertising subject to certain conditions, including a display area of not greater than 4,464 square inches. The bill would require the authority to submit a specified report to the Legislature and the Department of the California Highway Patrol by July 1, 2017, on the incidence of adverse impacts, if any. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations concerning the need for special legislation.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/20/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 20, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- AB2375 View text html
Action History
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4600.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Runner · Cosponsor
- Knight · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Knight
Co-sponsors (1)
- Runner
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 22% | 56% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 44% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2375 do?
- Existing law authorizes a bus operated by a publicly owned transit system on regularly scheduled service to be equipped with illuminated signs that display information directly related to public service and include, among other things, destination signs, route-number signs, run-number signs, public service announcement signs, or a combination of those signs, visible from any direction of the vehicle, that emit any light color, other than the color red emitted from forward-facing signs, pursuant to specified conditions. Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2017, a pilot program that allows up to 25 buses operated by the City of Santa Monica's publicly owned transit system for the first 2 years of the pilot program, and up to 30 buses thereafter, to be equipped with illuminated signs that display advertising subject to certain conditions, including a display area of not greater than 4,464 square inches. This bill would require the Antelope Valley Transit Authority on or before March 1, 2013, if it elects to implement the pilot program authorized by the bill, to determine whether the City of Santa Monica has at least one transit bus equipped with illuminated signs that is operational pursuant to the pilot program authorized under existing law. If the Antelope Valley Transit Authority determines that the City of Santa Monica does have such a transit bus, the bill would prohibit the Antelope Valley Transit Authority from implementing the bill's pilot program. If the Antelope Valley Transit Authority determines that the City of Santa Monica does not have such a bus, the Antelope Valley Transit Authority would be authorized to implement the bill's pilot program. The bill would authorize, until January 1, 2018, a pilot program that would allow up to 25 buses operated by the Antelope Valley Transit Authority's publicly owned transit system for the first 2 years of the pilot program, and up to 30 buses thereafter, to be equipped with illuminated signs that display advertising subject to certain conditions, including a display area of not greater than 4,464 square inches. The bill would require the authority to submit a specified report to the Legislature and the Department of the California Highway Patrol by July 1, 2017, on the incidence of adverse impacts, if any. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations concerning the need for special legislation.
- Who sponsors AB 2375?
- AB 2375 is sponsored by Runner and Knight.
- What is the current status of AB 2375?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2375?
- Track AB 2375 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2375
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2375
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →