California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 477 — School district reorganization: bonded indebtedness: Wiseburn Unified School District: Centinela Valley Union High School District.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 730, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law specifies the manner in which bonded indebtedness of a school district on general obligation bonds is reallocated among school districts when school districts are reorganized. This bill, notwithstanding the provisions above, would specify the manner in which the liability for taxation, the bonding capacity, the permitted use of existing bond proceeds, and the allocation of authorized but unsold bonds of the Wiseburn Unified School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District would be determined upon the reorganization of the Wiseburn School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District by the formation of the Wiseburn Unified School District and the termination of the Wiseburn School District. The bill also would authorize the Local Public Schools Funding Authority, a joint powers authority created by the Wiseburn School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District or the Wiseburn Unified School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District, to issue bonds pursuant to laws governing the issuance of school facilities construction bonds by school districts. To the extent that these actions would cause local taxing authorities to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires plans and recommendations for the reorganization of school districts to include a computation of the base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance. This bill would set forth a calculation by which to determine the blended revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the Wiseburn Unified School District. (3) Existing law sets forth the procedures for the reorganization of school districts. This bill would authorize a pupil residing in the Wiseburn Unified School District who is eligible to attend any of grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to attend the Centinela Valley Union High School District without an interdistrict attendance agreement if the Centinela Valley Union High School District accepts that pupil for attendance. (4) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Centinela Valley Union High School District and the Wiseburn School District. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 730, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4960.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 4877.)

  6. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on ED. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4746.) Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  8. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  9. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6124.) Ordered to the Senate.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 16).

  12. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 27).

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  17. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  18. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 6).

  19. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  21. Referred to Com. on ED.

  22. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  23. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 1177.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  24. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  25. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 1013.) (May 16).

  26. Set for hearing May 16.

  27. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 850.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  28. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  29. Set for hearing May 4.

  30. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  31. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  32. Set for hearing March 23.

  33. Referred to Com. on ED.

  34. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.

  35. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wright · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wright

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31006
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 34006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Evans — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
Pavley — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9001
Total 9001
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Lowenthal — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Liu — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 74003
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hill — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beall — Yea
Monning — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Carter — Yea
Conway — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 26 Yea · 11 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 241003
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 261103
% of votes cast 65%28%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Runner — Nay
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Harman — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Wyland — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6300
Total 6300
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Price — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Emmerson — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7201
Total 7201
% of votes cast 70%20%0%10%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Runner — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Huff — Nay
Liu — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 477 do?
(1) Existing law specifies the manner in which bonded indebtedness of a school district on general obligation bonds is reallocated among school districts when school districts are reorganized. This bill, notwithstanding the provisions above, would specify the manner in which the liability for taxation, the bonding capacity, the permitted use of existing bond proceeds, and the allocation of authorized but unsold bonds of the Wiseburn Unified School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District would be determined upon the reorganization of the Wiseburn School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District by the formation of the Wiseburn Unified School District and the termination of the Wiseburn School District. The bill also would authorize the Local Public Schools Funding Authority, a joint powers authority created by the Wiseburn School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District or the Wiseburn Unified School District and the Centinela Valley Union High School District, to issue bonds pursuant to laws governing the issuance of school facilities construction bonds by school districts. To the extent that these actions would cause local taxing authorities to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires plans and recommendations for the reorganization of school districts to include a computation of the base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance. This bill would set forth a calculation by which to determine the blended revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the Wiseburn Unified School District. (3) Existing law sets forth the procedures for the reorganization of school districts. This bill would authorize a pupil residing in the Wiseburn Unified School District who is eligible to attend any of grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to attend the Centinela Valley Union High School District without an interdistrict attendance agreement if the Centinela Valley Union High School District accepts that pupil for attendance. (4) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Centinela Valley Union High School District and the Wiseburn School District. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 477?
SB 477 is sponsored by Wright.
What is the current status of SB 477?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 477?
Track SB 477 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 477

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 477

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →