California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 2442 — State property: California Hope Public Trust.

Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires each state agency to report annually to the Department of General Services any proprietary state lands under the jurisdiction of that agency that are in excess of the foreseeable needs of that agency. Existing law provides certain exceptions from this requirement, including, among others, lands under the jurisdiction of specified state entities. Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to require a state agency to transfer to the department jurisdiction over any land declared excess by a state agency. Existing law authorizes the department to take specified actions with respect to that property, including, among others, asking permission from the Legislature to sell or dispose of the property. Existing law authorizes the department to give priority to any property that involves the exchange of surplus lands listed in specified reports. Existing law requires the department to maintain a complete and accurate statewide inventory of all real property held by the state. This bill would exempt additional agencies from the requirement to report annually to the Department of General Services any property held by that agency that is in excess of its needs. The bill would authorize the department to give priority to proposals to further the purposes of the provisions governing the California Hope Public Trust. The bill would establish the California Hope Public Trust in state government, to be governed and administered by the Department of General Services with input from a 9‑member advisory board of the trust, as specified. The bill would require the Department of General Services by March 31, 2013, and annually thereafter, to submit to the trust a complete and thorough inventory of all state‑owned real estate and property that is not exempt from transfer to the trust, as specified, and all lease agreements between any state agency and private or nonpublic management groups, as specified. The bill would require the trust by January 1, 2015, and at least biennially thereafter, to review that inventory of state-owned property, in consultation with the board, and to determine which properties shall be controlled by the trust. The bill would require the trust, in consultation with the board, by January 1, 2015, and as appropriate thereafter, to request that the Legislature enact legislation that would authorize the trust to control any of those properties. The bill would authorize the trust to hire staff for these purposes. The bill would require the Department of General Services to provide the board with suitable office accommodations. The bill would require the trust to accomplish various objectives, including, among others, to generate a return on real estate holdings in the possession of the trust, and to use private sector management and accounting methods to provide for the efficient and effective utilization of state assets. The bill would authorize the trust to carry out various powers, including, among others, to acquire or dispose of any property, to construct and maintain any building, and to lease property to public or private entities. The bill would prohibit the trust from selling or disposing of any land reported as excess or any surplus state real property under certain statutes. The bill would prohibit the trust from taking responsibility of certain lands under the responsibility of the Judicial Council and other specified types of land and property. Notwithstanding the above, the bill would provide that these provisions shall become operative only to the extent legislation is enacted to authorize the trust to control those properties, as specified. The bill would require the budget of the trust to be subject to appropriation in the annual Budget Act. The bill would require all net proceeds received or generated as a result of activities of the trust to be paid to the California Hope Public Trust Fund, which would be created by this bill, and require the trust to use the money in that fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act in accordance with a specified schedule, to support the California State University, California Community Colleges, and University of California systems. Commencing on or before July 1, 2016, and each year thereafter, the bill would require the trust to report to the Legislature on the activities undertaken by the trust and to include a financial statement showing the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenditures of the trust, and a summary of net proceeds. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2019, unless legislation is enacted that becomes effective before that date, that transfers management and control over property to the trust.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  2. Vetoed by Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 26. Page 6660.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6605.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 15. Page 4981.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Ordered to second reading.

  12. Withdrawn from committee.

  13. In committee: Held under submission.

  14. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  15. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. Withdrawn from committee.

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  19. Referred to Coms. on G.O. and GOV. & F.

  20. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  21. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 5134.)

  22. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  23. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  24. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).

  25. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. Read second time and amended.

  28. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 17).

  29. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  30. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.

  31. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.

  32. Referred to Coms. on B., P. & C.P. and HIGHER ED.

  33. Read first time.

  34. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  35. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Williams · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Williams

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading AB2442 Williams By Liu

Passed 21 Yea · 15 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 191404
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 211504
% of votes cast 53%38%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Cannella — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Correa — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Vargas — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

AB 2442 WILLIAMS Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 52 Yea · 26 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 502502
Republican 1100
Democratic 1000
Total 522602
% of votes cast 65%33%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Nay
Gorell — Nay
Hall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fong — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Fletcher — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Monning — Yea
Norby — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Perea — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Governance and Finance.

Passed 7 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5402
Democratic 2000
Total 7402
% of votes cast 54%31%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Evans — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2442 WILLIAMS Assembly Third Reading

Passed 50 Yea · 25 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0200
Unaffiliated 492305
Democratic 1000
Total 502505
% of votes cast 63%31%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Carter — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Ma — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Feuer — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Fletcher — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Cook — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Norby — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Campos — Yea
Conway — Nay
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Lara — Yea
Norby — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance housing education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2442 do?
Existing law requires each state agency to report annually to the Department of General Services any proprietary state lands under the jurisdiction of that agency that are in excess of the foreseeable needs of that agency. Existing law provides certain exceptions from this requirement, including, among others, lands under the jurisdiction of specified state entities. Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to require a state agency to transfer to the department jurisdiction over any land declared excess by a state agency. Existing law authorizes the department to take specified actions with respect to that property, including, among others, asking permission from the Legislature to sell or dispose of the property. Existing law authorizes the department to give priority to any property that involves the exchange of surplus lands listed in specified reports. Existing law requires the department to maintain a complete and accurate statewide inventory of all real property held by the state. This bill would exempt additional agencies from the requirement to report annually to the Department of General Services any property held by that agency that is in excess of its needs. The bill would authorize the department to give priority to proposals to further the purposes of the provisions governing the California Hope Public Trust. The bill would establish the California Hope Public Trust in state government, to be governed and administered by the Department of General Services with input from a 9‑member advisory board of the trust, as specified. The bill would require the Department of General Services by March 31, 2013, and annually thereafter, to submit to the trust a complete and thorough inventory of all state‑owned real estate and property that is not exempt from transfer to the trust, as specified, and all lease agreements between any state agency and private or nonpublic management groups, as specified. The bill would require the trust by January 1, 2015, and at least biennially thereafter, to review that inventory of state-owned property, in consultation with the board, and to determine which properties shall be controlled by the trust. The bill would require the trust, in consultation with the board, by January 1, 2015, and as appropriate thereafter, to request that the Legislature enact legislation that would authorize the trust to control any of those properties. The bill would authorize the trust to hire staff for these purposes. The bill would require the Department of General Services to provide the board with suitable office accommodations. The bill would require the trust to accomplish various objectives, including, among others, to generate a return on real estate holdings in the possession of the trust, and to use private sector management and accounting methods to provide for the efficient and effective utilization of state assets. The bill would authorize the trust to carry out various powers, including, among others, to acquire or dispose of any property, to construct and maintain any building, and to lease property to public or private entities. The bill would prohibit the trust from selling or disposing of any land reported as excess or any surplus state real property under certain statutes. The bill would prohibit the trust from taking responsibility of certain lands under the responsibility of the Judicial Council and other specified types of land and property. Notwithstanding the above, the bill would provide that these provisions shall become operative only to the extent legislation is enacted to authorize the trust to control those properties, as specified. The bill would require the budget of the trust to be subject to appropriation in the annual Budget Act. The bill would require all net proceeds received or generated as a result of activities of the trust to be paid to the California Hope Public Trust Fund, which would be created by this bill, and require the trust to use the money in that fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act in accordance with a specified schedule, to support the California State University, California Community Colleges, and University of California systems. Commencing on or before July 1, 2016, and each year thereafter, the bill would require the trust to report to the Legislature on the activities undertaken by the trust and to include a financial statement showing the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenditures of the trust, and a summary of net proceeds. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2019, unless legislation is enacted that becomes effective before that date, that transfers management and control over property to the trust.
Who sponsors AB 2442?
AB 2442 is sponsored by Williams.
What is the current status of AB 2442?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2442?
Track AB 2442 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2442

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2442

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →