California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1474 — Public social services: alcohol and drug programs.

Last action — Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under existing law, the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs is responsible for administering prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse and problem gambling. Existing law requires the department to issue allocations of state and federal funds available to counties to provide alcohol and other drug programs. Existing law also requires counties that utilize these funds to adopt and submit to the department a county plan and negotiated net amount contract for department review and approval or disapproval, as specified. This bill would, among other things, provide that, effective July 1, 2013, the administrative and programmatic functions that were previously performed by the department are transferred to departments within the California Health and Human Services Agency. It would also provide that the ultimate placement of these functions is contingent upon the Budget Act of 2013 and implementing legislation. The bill would, operative July 1, 2012, delete the county plan and negotiated net amount contract requirements and instead require counties that apply for funds to submit to the department a contract for federal funding from the state to provide alcohol and other drug prevention, treatment, and recovery services. It would declare that the state has an interest in a specified women and children's residential treatment services program, funded by federal grants, and state the Legislature's intent for the department to work with counties under the 2011 realignment to develop reporting requirements. The bill would generally remove references to state involvement and funding in reference to alcohol and drug abuse prevention, treatment, and recovery services in a county. The bill would authorize counties to establish drug courts subject to certain requirements and state oversight. This bill would also revise provisions pertaining to apportionment of penalties among counties. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal Drug Treatment Program (Drug Medi-Cal) , under which counties enter into contracts with a department within the California Health and Human Services Agency for the provision of various drug treatment services to Medi-Cal recipients, or the department directly arranges for the provision of these services if a county elects not to do so. Existing law requires, commencing July 1, 2012, that the administrative functions of the Drug Medi-Cal Program performed by the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs be transferred to the State Department of Health Care Services in accordance with an administrative and programmatic transition plan. This bill would, operative July 1, 2012, make various changes to the statutory provisions regulating the Drug Medi-Cal program to conform these provisions to the above-described transfer requirement. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  2. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  3. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (June 25).

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  6. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  7. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 23. Page 4087.)

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Ordered to second reading.

  11. Withdrawn from committee.

  12. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 46. Noes 24. Page 4011.)

  13. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 46. Noes 24. Page 4011.)

  14. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  15. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  16. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass.

Passed 10 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10105
Total 10105
% of votes cast 63%6%0%31%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Evans — Not Voting
Fuller — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Leno — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
La Malfa — Not Voting

Official roll call →

AB 1474 BUDGET Assembly Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 47 Yea · 23 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4621010
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 4723010
% of votes cast 59%29%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Hall — Not Voting
Butler — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Campos — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Conway — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Fletcher — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Valadao — Not Voting
Achadjian — Nay
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Norby — Nay
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety healthcare
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1474 do?
Under existing law, the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs is responsible for administering prevention, treatment, and recovery services for alcohol and drug abuse and problem gambling. Existing law requires the department to issue allocations of state and federal funds available to counties to provide alcohol and other drug programs. Existing law also requires counties that utilize these funds to adopt and submit to the department a county plan and negotiated net amount contract for department review and approval or disapproval, as specified. This bill would, among other things, provide that, effective July 1, 2013, the administrative and programmatic functions that were previously performed by the department are transferred to departments within the California Health and Human Services Agency. It would also provide that the ultimate placement of these functions is contingent upon the Budget Act of 2013 and implementing legislation. The bill would, operative July 1, 2012, delete the county plan and negotiated net amount contract requirements and instead require counties that apply for funds to submit to the department a contract for federal funding from the state to provide alcohol and other drug prevention, treatment, and recovery services. It would declare that the state has an interest in a specified women and children's residential treatment services program, funded by federal grants, and state the Legislature's intent for the department to work with counties under the 2011 realignment to develop reporting requirements. The bill would generally remove references to state involvement and funding in reference to alcohol and drug abuse prevention, treatment, and recovery services in a county. The bill would authorize counties to establish drug courts subject to certain requirements and state oversight. This bill would also revise provisions pertaining to apportionment of penalties among counties. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal Drug Treatment Program (Drug Medi-Cal) , under which counties enter into contracts with a department within the California Health and Human Services Agency for the provision of various drug treatment services to Medi-Cal recipients, or the department directly arranges for the provision of these services if a county elects not to do so. Existing law requires, commencing July 1, 2012, that the administrative functions of the Drug Medi-Cal Program performed by the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs be transferred to the State Department of Health Care Services in accordance with an administrative and programmatic transition plan. This bill would, operative July 1, 2012, make various changes to the statutory provisions regulating the Drug Medi-Cal program to conform these provisions to the above-described transfer requirement. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 1474?
AB 1474 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 1474?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1474?
Track AB 1474 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1474

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1474

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →