California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1102 — State transportation improvement program.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 272, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the state transportation improvement program process, pursuant to which the California Transportation Commission generally programs and allocates available funds for transportation capital improvement projects over a multiyear period. Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation is responsible for the state highway system. Existing law requires the department to annually prepare a project delivery report that identifies milestone dates for state highway projects costing $1,000,000 or more for which the department is the responsible agency for project development work. This bill would require the department, beginning not later than November 15, 2014, as part of the annual project delivery report, to report on the difference between the original allocation made by the commission and the actual construction capital and support costs at project close for all state transportation improvement program projects completed during the previous fiscal year. (2) Existing law provides funding for interregional and regional transportation capital improvement projects through the state transportation improvement program process, with 25% of funds available for interregional projects and 75% for regional projects. Existing law requires funds available for regional projects to be programmed by the commission pursuant to the county shares formula, under which a minimum amount of funding is available for programming in each county. Existing law specifies the project costs to be charged against county shares in that regard and, in certain cases, provides for adjustments by the commission if project costs change. This bill would revise these provisions to require project costs to include right-of-way support costs. The bill would require the commission to allocate funds for construction support costs for a project in the state transportation improvement program at the time of allocation of funds for construction capital costs. The bill would require a supplemental project allocation request to be made for all interregional and regional projects that experience construction support costs equal to or more than 120% of the amount originally allocated. The bill would make other related changes.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 272, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4624.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5967.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  8. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  11. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3399.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  16. Set for hearing April 30.

  17. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3034.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Set for hearing March 27.

  19. Referred to Com. on T. & H.

  20. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18.

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Anderson · Cosponsor
  • DeSaulnier · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • DeSaulnier

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Anderson

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Evans — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 76001
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Halderman — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Campos — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torres — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Block — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Norby — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lara — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13001
Total 13001
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Galgiani — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Miller — Yea
Norby — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34003
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Huff — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Anderson — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Simitian — Not Voting
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1102 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the state transportation improvement program process, pursuant to which the California Transportation Commission generally programs and allocates available funds for transportation capital improvement projects over a multiyear period. Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation is responsible for the state highway system. Existing law requires the department to annually prepare a project delivery report that identifies milestone dates for state highway projects costing $1,000,000 or more for which the department is the responsible agency for project development work. This bill would require the department, beginning not later than November 15, 2014, as part of the annual project delivery report, to report on the difference between the original allocation made by the commission and the actual construction capital and support costs at project close for all state transportation improvement program projects completed during the previous fiscal year. (2) Existing law provides funding for interregional and regional transportation capital improvement projects through the state transportation improvement program process, with 25% of funds available for interregional projects and 75% for regional projects. Existing law requires funds available for regional projects to be programmed by the commission pursuant to the county shares formula, under which a minimum amount of funding is available for programming in each county. Existing law specifies the project costs to be charged against county shares in that regard and, in certain cases, provides for adjustments by the commission if project costs change. This bill would revise these provisions to require project costs to include right-of-way support costs. The bill would require the commission to allocate funds for construction support costs for a project in the state transportation improvement program at the time of allocation of funds for construction capital costs. The bill would require a supplemental project allocation request to be made for all interregional and regional projects that experience construction support costs equal to or more than 120% of the amount originally allocated. The bill would make other related changes.
Who sponsors SB 1102?
SB 1102 is sponsored by Anderson and DeSaulnier.
What is the current status of SB 1102?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1102?
Track SB 1102 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1102

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1102

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →