Public employees' retirement benefits.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1184 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1184.
You're tracking AB 1184
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1184 — Public employees' retirement benefits.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) creates the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) , which provides a defined benefit to its employees based on age at retirement, service credit, and final or highest compensation paid to the employee. Existing law authorizes any public agency to participate in, and make its employees members of, PERS by contract. In the case of an employee who has been employed by one or more contracting public agencies, retirement benefits distributed to that employee are based on the highest final compensation under any system, and each system makes a separate retirement payment to the employee based upon the number of years that the employee worked for each of those agencies. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that a contracting agency not experience a significant increase in actuarial liability due to increased compensation paid by another contracting agency to a nonrepresented employee. The bill would require the Board of Administration of PERS to develop guidelines in this regard and to implement program changes to ensure that a contracting agency that creates a significant increase in actuarial liability due to increased compensation bears the associated liability. The bill would require the system actuary to assess an increase in liability in this regard to the employer that created it at the time the increase is determined and to make adjustments to that employer's rates as needed. The bill would apply these requirements to any significant increase in actuarial liability due to increased compensation paid to a nonrepresented employee regardless of when the increase in compensation occurred. The bill would require the board to report to the Legislature on the implementation of these provisions. Existing law requires the Board of Administration of PERS to establish a plan of replacement benefits for members and any survivors or beneficiaries whose retirement benefits are limited by a specified provision of federal law and that cannot be fully maximized pursuant to PERL. This bill would prohibit a plan of replacement benefits from being administered by the board for a person who first becomes a member on or after January 1, 2013.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/22/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 22, 2011
- Amended 07/01/11 - Amended Senate pdf July 01, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1184 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Allen.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Ma.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2127.).
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 15).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27).
-
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 23. Page 1712.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Blumenfield · Cosponsor
- Gordon · Cosponsor
- Gatto · Primary
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Liu · Cosponsor
- Smyth · Cosponsor
- Williams · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gatto
Co-sponsors (6)
- Blumenfield
- Gordon
- Jeffries
- Liu
- Smyth
- Williams
Not signed on (115)
115 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 115 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 21 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 23 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 29% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1184 do?
- The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) creates the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) , which provides a defined benefit to its employees based on age at retirement, service credit, and final or highest compensation paid to the employee. Existing law authorizes any public agency to participate in, and make its employees members of, PERS by contract. In the case of an employee who has been employed by one or more contracting public agencies, retirement benefits distributed to that employee are based on the highest final compensation under any system, and each system makes a separate retirement payment to the employee based upon the number of years that the employee worked for each of those agencies. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that a contracting agency not experience a significant increase in actuarial liability due to increased compensation paid by another contracting agency to a nonrepresented employee. The bill would require the Board of Administration of PERS to develop guidelines in this regard and to implement program changes to ensure that a contracting agency that creates a significant increase in actuarial liability due to increased compensation bears the associated liability. The bill would require the system actuary to assess an increase in liability in this regard to the employer that created it at the time the increase is determined and to make adjustments to that employer's rates as needed. The bill would apply these requirements to any significant increase in actuarial liability due to increased compensation paid to a nonrepresented employee regardless of when the increase in compensation occurred. The bill would require the board to report to the Legislature on the implementation of these provisions. Existing law requires the Board of Administration of PERS to establish a plan of replacement benefits for members and any survivors or beneficiaries whose retirement benefits are limited by a specified provision of federal law and that cannot be fully maximized pursuant to PERL. This bill would prohibit a plan of replacement benefits from being administered by the board for a person who first becomes a member on or after January 1, 2013.
- Who sponsors AB 1184?
- AB 1184 is sponsored by Blumenfield, Gordon, Gatto, Jeffries, Liu, Smyth, and Williams.
- What is the current status of AB 1184?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1184?
- Track AB 1184 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1184
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1184
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →