Solar energy: permits.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1222 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1222.
You're tracking SB 1222
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1222 — Solar energy: permits.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 614, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides that it is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of solar energy systems, as defined, and to limit obstacles to their use. Existing law provides that the implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve timely and cost-effective installation of solar energy systems is not a municipal affair, but is instead a matter of statewide concern. Existing law requires a city or county to administratively approve applications to install solar energy systems through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit. Existing law requires fees charged by a local agency for specified purposes, including permits, to not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of this cost is submitted to, and approved by, 23 of the electors. This bill would require permit fees for rooftop solar energy systems, as specified, by a city, county, city or county, or charter city to not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, which cannot exceed $500 plus $15 per kilowatt for each kilowatt above 15kW for residential rooftop solar energy systems, and $1,000 plus $7 per kilowatt for each kilowatt between 51kW and 250kW, plus $5 for every kilowatt above 250kW, for commercial rooftop solar energy systems, unless certain conditions are met. By requiring local agencies to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. The provisions of the bill would remain in effect only until January 1, 2018.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2012
- Enrolled 08/31/12 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2012
- Amended 08/21/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 21, 2012
- Amended 06/19/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 19, 2012
- Amended 05/25/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 25, 2012
- Amended 05/01/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 01, 2012
- Amended 04/09/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 09, 2012
- Introduced 02/23/12 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2012
- SB1222 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 614, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 12. Page 4977.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 13. Page 6353.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (August 16).
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 3698.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3593.) (May 24).
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 14.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3304.) (April 25).
-
Set for hearing April 25.
-
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Campos · Cosponsor
- Leno · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Leno
Co-sponsors (1)
- Campos
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 30% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 58 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 16% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 6% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 11% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 25 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 33% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1222 do?
- Existing law provides that it is the policy of the state to promote and encourage the use of solar energy systems, as defined, and to limit obstacles to their use. Existing law provides that the implementation of consistent statewide standards to achieve timely and cost-effective installation of solar energy systems is not a municipal affair, but is instead a matter of statewide concern. Existing law requires a city or county to administratively approve applications to install solar energy systems through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit. Existing law requires fees charged by a local agency for specified purposes, including permits, to not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of this cost is submitted to, and approved by, 23 of the electors. This bill would require permit fees for rooftop solar energy systems, as specified, by a city, county, city or county, or charter city to not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, which cannot exceed $500 plus $15 per kilowatt for each kilowatt above 15kW for residential rooftop solar energy systems, and $1,000 plus $7 per kilowatt for each kilowatt between 51kW and 250kW, plus $5 for every kilowatt above 250kW, for commercial rooftop solar energy systems, unless certain conditions are met. By requiring local agencies to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. The provisions of the bill would remain in effect only until January 1, 2018.
- Who sponsors SB 1222?
- SB 1222 is sponsored by Campos and Leno.
- What is the current status of SB 1222?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1222?
- Track SB 1222 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1222
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1222
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →