California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 162 — Economic development: federally recognized Indian tribes.

Last action — Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law encourages and authorizes all state agencies to cooperate with federally recognized California Indian tribes on matters of economic development and improvement for the Indian tribes. Existing law provides that cooperation by state agencies with federally recognized California Indian tribes on those matters may include certain activities, including, among others, providing information on programs to assist Indian tribes. Existing federal law requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish a list of all federally recognized Indian tribes in the federal register. This bill would add to the nonexclusive list of topics that state agencies may cooperate with federally recognized Indian tribes by consulting on a government-to-government basis, in a respectful and meaningful manner, with respect to a fee-to-trust land acquisition application, as specified. The bill would prohibit a state agency from opposing specified fee-to-trust land acquisition applications. The bill would define a federally recognized Indian tribe as a tribe appearing on the list published by the Secretary of the Interior.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  3. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  4. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  5. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  6. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1190.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 1085.) (May 23).

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. Set for hearing May 23.

  12. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  13. Set for hearing May 16.

  14. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  15. Set for hearing May 2.

  16. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 617.) (April 12).

  18. Set for hearing April 12.

  19. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  20. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  21. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 5.

  22. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Anderson · Primary
  • Garrick · Cosponsor
  • Wyland · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Anderson

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Garrick
  • Wyland

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Runner — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10000
Republican 1000
Democratic 0002
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Evans — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing civil-rights labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 162 do?
Existing law encourages and authorizes all state agencies to cooperate with federally recognized California Indian tribes on matters of economic development and improvement for the Indian tribes. Existing law provides that cooperation by state agencies with federally recognized California Indian tribes on those matters may include certain activities, including, among others, providing information on programs to assist Indian tribes. Existing federal law requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish a list of all federally recognized Indian tribes in the federal register. This bill would add to the nonexclusive list of topics that state agencies may cooperate with federally recognized Indian tribes by consulting on a government-to-government basis, in a respectful and meaningful manner, with respect to a fee-to-trust land acquisition application, as specified. The bill would prohibit a state agency from opposing specified fee-to-trust land acquisition applications. The bill would define a federally recognized Indian tribe as a tribe appearing on the list published by the Secretary of the Interior.
Who sponsors SB 162?
SB 162 is sponsored by Anderson, Garrick, and Wyland.
What is the current status of SB 162?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 162?
Track SB 162 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 162

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 162

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →