California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 645 — Charter schools: charter renewal.

Last action — Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the California School Finance Authority, and authorizes the authority to issue revenue bonds to finance a single or series of projects or financing of working capital for a single or several participating parties, defined as a school district, charter school, county office of education, or community college district that undertakes the financing or refinancing of a project or of working capital, or a joint venture school facility construction project. This bill would authorize the authority to issue revenue bonds to refinance those projects. (2) The Charter Schools Act of 1992 (Charter Schools Act) specifies the procedures for the submission, review, and approval or denial of a petition to establish a charter school. The Charter Schools Act limits the duration of charters to a period not to exceed 5 years and authorizes the chartering authority to grant one or more subsequent renewals for an additional period of 5 years. The Charter Schools Act prescribes the requirements a charter school must meet in order to have its charter renewed, including a requirement that a charter school that has been in operation for 4 years satisfy at least one of several specified criteria regarding academic performance. This bill would change the criteria a charter school is required to meet in order to have its charter renewed. The bill would authorize a charter school not meeting the renewal criteria to apply to the State Board of Education for a determination of academic eligibility for the renewal of its charter by submitting supporting evidence to the state board and the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The bill would require the charter school to submit a copy of the application and supporting evidence to its charter authorizer. The bill would require the Superintendent and authorize the charter authorizer to make a recommendation to the state board on the application. The bill would require the state board to issue a positive determination of academic eligibility if the state board finds that the charter school clearly demonstrates that the academic performance of the school's pupils builds an expectation that the pupils will continue to improve academically and have the opportunity to be successful in college or career. A charter renewal based on a determination of academic eligibility would be granted for only 3 years. The bill also would make a conforming change. (3) Existing law establishes the Charter School Facility Grant Program to provide assistance with facility rent and lease costs for pupils in charter schools, and states the intent of the Legislature that not less than $18,000,000 annually be appropriated for purposes of the program. Eligibility for a grant is based on the percentage of pupils who are eligible for free and reduced-price meals and are enrolled in the charter school or reside in the attendance area of, or are enrolled in, the public elementary school where the charter school is physically located. Eligible schools receive up to $750 per unit of average daily attendance for a maximum of 75% of the annual facilities rent and lease costs for the charter school. Funds appropriated for purposes of the program are prohibited from being apportioned for units of average daily attendance generated through nonclassroom-based instruction, as defined, or for a school that does not comply with conditions or limitations set forth in regulations adopted by the state board. This bill would increase the amount eligible schools receive to $800 per unit of average daily attendance. The bill would require eligibility for this grant program to be expanded if funds remain after charter schools that meet the existing free and reduced-price meals threshold are funded. The bill would remove the prohibition against funding for units of average daily attendance that do not comply with conditions or limitations set forth in regulations, and would allow eligibility to be expanded, as specified, for charter schools that generate units of average daily attendance through nonclassroom-based instruction if the school operates facilities that provide direct instruction and support to enrolled pupils. The bill would require a charter school offering nonclassroom-based instruction and applying for funding to identify in apportionment reports the proportion of time pupils in the school are scheduled to receive classroom-based instruction.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  2. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (July 6).

  5. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  6. Referred to Com. on ED.

  7. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  8. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 10. Page 1232.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1120.) (May 26).

  11. Set for hearing May 26.

  12. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. Set for hearing May 23.

  14. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 850.) (May 4).

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  17. Set for hearing May 4.

  18. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  19. Set for hearing March 30.

  20. Referred to Com. on ED.

  21. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.

  22. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alquist · Cosponsor
  • Brownley · Cosponsor
  • Simitian · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Simitian

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Alquist
  • Brownley

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 27 Yea · 10 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25903
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 271003
% of votes cast 68%25%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Nay
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Harman — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Huff — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Leno — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Runner — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Corbett — Nay
Dutton — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Hernandez — Not Voting
Pavley — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8001
Total 8001
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Walters — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 645 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the California School Finance Authority, and authorizes the authority to issue revenue bonds to finance a single or series of projects or financing of working capital for a single or several participating parties, defined as a school district, charter school, county office of education, or community college district that undertakes the financing or refinancing of a project or of working capital, or a joint venture school facility construction project. This bill would authorize the authority to issue revenue bonds to refinance those projects. (2) The Charter Schools Act of 1992 (Charter Schools Act) specifies the procedures for the submission, review, and approval or denial of a petition to establish a charter school. The Charter Schools Act limits the duration of charters to a period not to exceed 5 years and authorizes the chartering authority to grant one or more subsequent renewals for an additional period of 5 years. The Charter Schools Act prescribes the requirements a charter school must meet in order to have its charter renewed, including a requirement that a charter school that has been in operation for 4 years satisfy at least one of several specified criteria regarding academic performance. This bill would change the criteria a charter school is required to meet in order to have its charter renewed. The bill would authorize a charter school not meeting the renewal criteria to apply to the State Board of Education for a determination of academic eligibility for the renewal of its charter by submitting supporting evidence to the state board and the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The bill would require the charter school to submit a copy of the application and supporting evidence to its charter authorizer. The bill would require the Superintendent and authorize the charter authorizer to make a recommendation to the state board on the application. The bill would require the state board to issue a positive determination of academic eligibility if the state board finds that the charter school clearly demonstrates that the academic performance of the school's pupils builds an expectation that the pupils will continue to improve academically and have the opportunity to be successful in college or career. A charter renewal based on a determination of academic eligibility would be granted for only 3 years. The bill also would make a conforming change. (3) Existing law establishes the Charter School Facility Grant Program to provide assistance with facility rent and lease costs for pupils in charter schools, and states the intent of the Legislature that not less than $18,000,000 annually be appropriated for purposes of the program. Eligibility for a grant is based on the percentage of pupils who are eligible for free and reduced-price meals and are enrolled in the charter school or reside in the attendance area of, or are enrolled in, the public elementary school where the charter school is physically located. Eligible schools receive up to $750 per unit of average daily attendance for a maximum of 75% of the annual facilities rent and lease costs for the charter school. Funds appropriated for purposes of the program are prohibited from being apportioned for units of average daily attendance generated through nonclassroom-based instruction, as defined, or for a school that does not comply with conditions or limitations set forth in regulations adopted by the state board. This bill would increase the amount eligible schools receive to $800 per unit of average daily attendance. The bill would require eligibility for this grant program to be expanded if funds remain after charter schools that meet the existing free and reduced-price meals threshold are funded. The bill would remove the prohibition against funding for units of average daily attendance that do not comply with conditions or limitations set forth in regulations, and would allow eligibility to be expanded, as specified, for charter schools that generate units of average daily attendance through nonclassroom-based instruction if the school operates facilities that provide direct instruction and support to enrolled pupils. The bill would require a charter school offering nonclassroom-based instruction and applying for funding to identify in apportionment reports the proportion of time pupils in the school are scheduled to receive classroom-based instruction.
Who sponsors SB 645?
SB 645 is sponsored by Alquist, Brownley, and Simitian.
What is the current status of SB 645?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 645?
Track SB 645 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 645

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 645

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →