AB 1893 — Probate proceedings: rules of practice.
Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides that except to the extent that the Probate Code provides applicable rules, the rules of practice applicable to civil actions, including discovery proceedings and other proceedings, as specified, apply to, and constitute the rules of practice in, proceedings under that code. Existing law provides that all issues of fact joined in probate proceedings shall be tried in conformity with the rules of practice in civil actions. Existing law also requires that an affidavit or verified petition be received as evidence when offered in an uncontested proceeding under the Probate Code. This bill would recast those provisions to provide more specificity for applicable rules for probate proceedings. This bill would also require that an affidavit or verified petition be received as evidence when offered in accordance with specified provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/25/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 25, 2012
- Amended 05/07/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 07, 2012
- Introduced 02/22/12 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2012
- AB1893 View text html
Action History
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4789.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 1).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Wagner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wagner
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1893 do?
- Existing law provides that except to the extent that the Probate Code provides applicable rules, the rules of practice applicable to civil actions, including discovery proceedings and other proceedings, as specified, apply to, and constitute the rules of practice in, proceedings under that code. Existing law provides that all issues of fact joined in probate proceedings shall be tried in conformity with the rules of practice in civil actions. Existing law also requires that an affidavit or verified petition be received as evidence when offered in an uncontested proceeding under the Probate Code. This bill would recast those provisions to provide more specificity for applicable rules for probate proceedings. This bill would also require that an affidavit or verified petition be received as evidence when offered in accordance with specified provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1893?
- AB 1893 is sponsored by Wagner.
- What is the current status of AB 1893?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1893?
- Track AB 1893 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1893
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1893
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →