AB 778 — Health care service plans: vision care.
Last action — In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene Act) , provides for the regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides that health care service plans shall not be deemed to be engaged in the practice of a profession, and may employ, or contract with, any licensed health care professional to deliver professional services, and may directly own, and may directly operate through its professional employees or contracted licensed professionals, offices and subsidiary corporations. Existing law provides that those professionals may not own or control offices or branch offices unless otherwise expressly authorized. This bill would authorize a registered dispensing optician, an optical company, a manufacturer or distributor of optical goods, or a nonoptometric corporation to own a specialized health care service plan that provides or arranges for the provision of vision care services, share profits with the specialized health care service plan, contract for specified business services with the specialized health care service plan, and jointly advertise vision care services with the specialized health care service plan. The bill would prohibit those persons or entities from engaging in conduct that would influence or interfere with the clinical decisions of an optometrist, as specified, and would set forth provisions that apply to medical records. Because a willful violation of these provisions would be a crime under the Knox-Keene Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care to conduct periodic onsite medical surveys of the health delivery system of each health care service plan. Survey results are publicly reported and subject to public inspection. Existing law requires the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care to notify a health care service plan of any deficiencies found by a survey. This bill would require the director to provide to a health care service plan and to the executive officer of the State Board of Optometry or the Medical Board of California a copy of information relating to the quality of care of any licensed optometrist or optician contained in any survey report that, in the judgment of the director, indicates incompetent or negligent treatment, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/21/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 21, 2011
- Amended 04/27/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 27, 2011
- Amended 04/12/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 12, 2011
- Amended 03/31/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 31, 2011
- Introduced 02/17/11 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2011
- AB778 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 5. Page 1554.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 11).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & C.P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Atkins · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Atkins
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 5 | 0 | 19 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 5 | 0 | 20 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 6% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 11% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 14 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 5% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 778 do?
- Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene Act) , provides for the regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides that health care service plans shall not be deemed to be engaged in the practice of a profession, and may employ, or contract with, any licensed health care professional to deliver professional services, and may directly own, and may directly operate through its professional employees or contracted licensed professionals, offices and subsidiary corporations. Existing law provides that those professionals may not own or control offices or branch offices unless otherwise expressly authorized. This bill would authorize a registered dispensing optician, an optical company, a manufacturer or distributor of optical goods, or a nonoptometric corporation to own a specialized health care service plan that provides or arranges for the provision of vision care services, share profits with the specialized health care service plan, contract for specified business services with the specialized health care service plan, and jointly advertise vision care services with the specialized health care service plan. The bill would prohibit those persons or entities from engaging in conduct that would influence or interfere with the clinical decisions of an optometrist, as specified, and would set forth provisions that apply to medical records. Because a willful violation of these provisions would be a crime under the Knox-Keene Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care to conduct periodic onsite medical surveys of the health delivery system of each health care service plan. Survey results are publicly reported and subject to public inspection. Existing law requires the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care to notify a health care service plan of any deficiencies found by a survey. This bill would require the director to provide to a health care service plan and to the executive officer of the State Board of Optometry or the Medical Board of California a copy of information relating to the quality of care of any licensed optometrist or optician contained in any survey report that, in the judgment of the director, indicates incompetent or negligent treatment, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 778?
- AB 778 is sponsored by Atkins.
- What is the current status of AB 778?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 778?
- Track AB 778 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 778
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 778
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →