Food safety: cottage food operations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1616 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1616.
You're tracking AB 1616
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1616 — Food safety: cottage food operations.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 415, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law (Sherman Law) , requires the State Department of Public Health to regulate the manufacture, sale, labeling, and advertising activities related to food, drugs, devices, and cosmetics in conformity with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The Sherman Law makes it unlawful to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale any food that is misbranded. Food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform to specified federal labeling requirements regarding nutrition, nutrient content or health claims, and food allergens. Violation of this law is a misdemeanor. The existing California Retail Food Code provides for the regulation of health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Under existing law, local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing the California Retail Food Code. That law exempts private homes from the definition of a food facility, and prohibits food stored or prepared in a private home from being used or offered for sale in a food facility. That law also requires food that is offered for human consumption to be honestly presented, as specified. A violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would include a cottage food operation, as defined, that is registered or has a permit within the private home exemption of the California Retail Food Code. The bill would also exclude a cottage food operation from specified food processing establishment and Sherman Law requirements. This bill would require a cottage food operation to meet specified requirements relating to training, sanitation, preparation, labeling, and permissible types of sales and would subject a cottage food operation to inspections under specified circumstances. The bill would require a food facility that serves a cottage food product without packaging or labeling to identify it as homemade. The bill would establish various zoning and permit requirements relating to cottage food operations. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 113789 of the Health and Safety Code, proposed by AB 2297, to be operative only if AB 2297 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. By imposing duties on local officials and adding new crimes, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/21/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 21, 2012
- Enrolled 09/05/12 - Enrolled pdf September 05, 2012
- Amended 08/30/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 30, 2012
- Amended 08/24/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 24, 2012
- Amended 08/21/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 21, 2012
- Amended 07/03/12 - Amended Senate pdf July 03, 2012
- Amended 05/03/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 03, 2012
- Amended 04/25/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2012
- Amended 04/10/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 10, 2012
- Introduced 02/08/12 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2012
- AB1616 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 415, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:55 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 16. Page 6691.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 5025.).
-
Senate Rule 29.3 suspended. (Page 5025.)
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Joint Rule 61(b)(16) suspended. (Page 5015.)
-
Pursuant to Joint Rule 33.1,
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 27).
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 19. Page 5042.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 17).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Fletcher · Cosponsor
- Correa · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Gatto · Primary
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Nestande · Cosponsor
- Wieckowski · Cosponsor
- V. Manuel Pérez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gatto
Co-sponsors (7)
- Fletcher
- Correa
- DeSaulnier
- Huffman
- Nestande
- Wieckowski
- V. Manuel Pérez
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 59 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 16 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 20% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 17 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 19 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1616 do?
- Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law (Sherman Law) , requires the State Department of Public Health to regulate the manufacture, sale, labeling, and advertising activities related to food, drugs, devices, and cosmetics in conformity with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The Sherman Law makes it unlawful to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale any food that is misbranded. Food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform to specified federal labeling requirements regarding nutrition, nutrient content or health claims, and food allergens. Violation of this law is a misdemeanor. The existing California Retail Food Code provides for the regulation of health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Under existing law, local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing the California Retail Food Code. That law exempts private homes from the definition of a food facility, and prohibits food stored or prepared in a private home from being used or offered for sale in a food facility. That law also requires food that is offered for human consumption to be honestly presented, as specified. A violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would include a cottage food operation, as defined, that is registered or has a permit within the private home exemption of the California Retail Food Code. The bill would also exclude a cottage food operation from specified food processing establishment and Sherman Law requirements. This bill would require a cottage food operation to meet specified requirements relating to training, sanitation, preparation, labeling, and permissible types of sales and would subject a cottage food operation to inspections under specified circumstances. The bill would require a food facility that serves a cottage food product without packaging or labeling to identify it as homemade. The bill would establish various zoning and permit requirements relating to cottage food operations. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 113789 of the Health and Safety Code, proposed by AB 2297, to be operative only if AB 2297 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. By imposing duties on local officials and adding new crimes, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 1616?
- AB 1616 is sponsored by Fletcher, Correa, DeSaulnier, Gatto, Huffman, Nestande, Wieckowski, and V. Manuel Pérez.
- What is the current status of AB 1616?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1616?
- Track AB 1616 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1616
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1616
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →