Protection of victims: address confidentiality.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1082 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1082.
You're tracking SB 1082
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1082 — Protection of victims: address confidentiality.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 270, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes victims of domestic violence or stalking and reproductive health care providers, employees, volunteers, and patients, as defined, to complete an application to be approved by the Secretary of State for the purposes of enabling state and local agencies to respond to requests for public records without disclosing a program participant's residence address contained in any public record and otherwise provide for confidentiality of identity for that person, subject to specified conditions. Existing law requires applicants to be certified for 4 years following the date of filing unless the certification is withdrawn or invalidated before that date. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to establish a renewal procedure. Existing law authorizes the Secretary of State to cancel a program participant's certification and authorizes a program participant to withdraw from program participation, as specified. This bill would require victims of domestic violence or stalking and reproductive health care providers, employees, and volunteers, as defined, to be domiciled in California, as specified, in order to apply for the program. This bill would authorize a minor program participant, who reaches 18 years of age during his or her enrollment, to renew as an adult, as specified. This bill would authorize the Secretary of State to refuse to renew a program participant's certification if the adult program participant or the parent or guardian acting on behalf of a minor or incapacitated person has abandoned his or her domicile in this state. This bill would modify the Secretary of State's authority to terminate a program participant's certification, as specified. This bill would authorize the office of the Secretary of State to refuse to handle or forward packages for program participants, as specified. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 6206 of the Government Code, as proposed by AB 2483, to be operative only if AB 2483 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/07/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 07, 2012
- Enrolled 08/22/12 - Enrolled pdf August 22, 2012
- Amended 08/06/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 06, 2012
- Amended 06/21/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 21, 2012
- Amended 04/24/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 24, 2012
- Amended 04/09/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 09, 2012
- Introduced 02/14/12 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2012
- SB1082 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 270, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4624.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5967.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 3472.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing May 7.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3207.) (April 17).
-
(Corrected April 13.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 17.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Corbett · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Corbett
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1082 do?
- Existing law authorizes victims of domestic violence or stalking and reproductive health care providers, employees, volunteers, and patients, as defined, to complete an application to be approved by the Secretary of State for the purposes of enabling state and local agencies to respond to requests for public records without disclosing a program participant's residence address contained in any public record and otherwise provide for confidentiality of identity for that person, subject to specified conditions. Existing law requires applicants to be certified for 4 years following the date of filing unless the certification is withdrawn or invalidated before that date. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to establish a renewal procedure. Existing law authorizes the Secretary of State to cancel a program participant's certification and authorizes a program participant to withdraw from program participation, as specified. This bill would require victims of domestic violence or stalking and reproductive health care providers, employees, and volunteers, as defined, to be domiciled in California, as specified, in order to apply for the program. This bill would authorize a minor program participant, who reaches 18 years of age during his or her enrollment, to renew as an adult, as specified. This bill would authorize the Secretary of State to refuse to renew a program participant's certification if the adult program participant or the parent or guardian acting on behalf of a minor or incapacitated person has abandoned his or her domicile in this state. This bill would modify the Secretary of State's authority to terminate a program participant's certification, as specified. This bill would authorize the office of the Secretary of State to refuse to handle or forward packages for program participants, as specified. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 6206 of the Government Code, as proposed by AB 2483, to be operative only if AB 2483 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
- Who sponsors SB 1082?
- SB 1082 is sponsored by Corbett.
- What is the current status of SB 1082?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1082?
- Track SB 1082 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1082
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1082
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →