Public contracts: school districts: bidding requirements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1565 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1565.
You're tracking AB 1565
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1565 — Public contracts: school districts: bidding requirements.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 808, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Under existing law, the governing board of a school district may require each prospective bidder for specified contracts to submit a standardized questionnaire and financial statement, including information relating to financial ability and experience in performing public works, which is required to be verified under oath. Existing law further requires a school district requiring the above information to adopt and apply a uniform system of rating bidders on the basis of the completed questionnaires and financial statements, as specified. This bill, for contracts awarded on and after January 1, 2014, and until January 1, 2019, would require the governing board of the district, except for school districts with an average daily attendance of less than 2,500, for certain public projects, to use procedures, which require a standardized questionnaire and financial statement to be verified under oath, for bidding applicable to public entities, as prescribed. This bill would require the questionnaire and uniform system of rating bidders to cover, at a minimum, the issues covered by the standardized questionnaire and model guidelines for rating bidders developed by the Department of Industrial Relations, as specified. This bill would provide that the questionnaire and uniform system of rating bidders would not preclude the governing board of the district from prequalifying or disqualifying a subcontractor. This bill would provide that bidders would include the general contractor and, if utilized, all electrical, mechanical, and plumbing subcontractors. This bill would authorize the board of the district to establish a process for prequalifying prospective bidders on a quarterly or annual basis, as provided. The bill would also require the Director of Industrial Relations, on or before January 1, 2018, to submit a report to the Legislature evaluating whether labor violations have decreased, as specified, and to recommend improvements to the system for prequalifying contractors and subcontractors on school district projects. By expanding the scope of an existing crime and by imposing new duties on local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2012
- Enrolled 09/11/12 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2012
- Amended 07/06/12 - Amended Senate pdf July 06, 2012
- Amended 06/21/12 - Amended Senate pdf June 21, 2012
- Amended 05/25/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 25, 2012
- Amended 04/26/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 26, 2012
- Introduced 01/30/12 - Introduced pdf January 30, 2012
- AB1565 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 808, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 26. Page 6535.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6488.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 10. Page 4887.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 27).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 22. Page 5105.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 18).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & C.P. and ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Cosponsor
- Fuentes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Fuentes
Co-sponsors (1)
- Alquist
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 25% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 10% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 20 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 22 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 28% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 9% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1565 do?
- Under existing law, the governing board of a school district may require each prospective bidder for specified contracts to submit a standardized questionnaire and financial statement, including information relating to financial ability and experience in performing public works, which is required to be verified under oath. Existing law further requires a school district requiring the above information to adopt and apply a uniform system of rating bidders on the basis of the completed questionnaires and financial statements, as specified. This bill, for contracts awarded on and after January 1, 2014, and until January 1, 2019, would require the governing board of the district, except for school districts with an average daily attendance of less than 2,500, for certain public projects, to use procedures, which require a standardized questionnaire and financial statement to be verified under oath, for bidding applicable to public entities, as prescribed. This bill would require the questionnaire and uniform system of rating bidders to cover, at a minimum, the issues covered by the standardized questionnaire and model guidelines for rating bidders developed by the Department of Industrial Relations, as specified. This bill would provide that the questionnaire and uniform system of rating bidders would not preclude the governing board of the district from prequalifying or disqualifying a subcontractor. This bill would provide that bidders would include the general contractor and, if utilized, all electrical, mechanical, and plumbing subcontractors. This bill would authorize the board of the district to establish a process for prequalifying prospective bidders on a quarterly or annual basis, as provided. The bill would also require the Director of Industrial Relations, on or before January 1, 2018, to submit a report to the Legislature evaluating whether labor violations have decreased, as specified, and to recommend improvements to the system for prequalifying contractors and subcontractors on school district projects. By expanding the scope of an existing crime and by imposing new duties on local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 1565?
- AB 1565 is sponsored by Alquist and Fuentes.
- What is the current status of AB 1565?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1565?
- Track AB 1565 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1565
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1565
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →