AB 434 — County penalties: forensic laboratories.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 195, Statutes of 2011.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act, an initiative measure, requires an additional penalty of $1 for every $10 or part thereof to be levied in each county upon every fine, penalty, or forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for all criminal offenses, as specified. The act requires the county board of supervisors to establish in the county treasury a DNA Identification Fund, into which the collected penalties are to be deposited. The act specifies the purposes for which funds in the county's DNA Identification Fund may be used, including to reimburse local sheriff, police, district attorney, and regional state crime laboratories for expenditures and administrative costs made or incurred in connection with the processing, analysis, tracking, and storage of DNA crime scene samples, as specified. The act provides for its amendment by the Legislature if the amendments further the act and are consistent with its purposes to enhance the use of DNA identification evidence for the purpose of accurate and expeditious crime solving and exonerating the innocent. This bill would provide that, if authorized by a resolution of the board of supervisors, a local sheriff or police department, or the district attorney's office, may use funds remaining in the county's DNA Identification Fund, either independently or in combination with remaining funds from another county, to provide supplemental funding to a qualified local or regional state forensic laboratory, as defined, for expenditures and administrative costs made or incurred in connection with the processing, analysis, and comparison of DNA crime scene samples and forensic identification samples, and testimony related to that analysis, as specified. The bill would declare that its provisions further the initiative act, and are consistent with its purposes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/31/11 - Chaptered Current pdf August 31, 2011
- Enrolled 08/16/11 - Enrolled pdf August 16, 2011
- Amended 03/29/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 29, 2011
- Introduced 02/14/11 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2011
- AB434 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 195, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:30 a.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1915.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 5).
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 910.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 5).
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Logue · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Logue
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 434 do?
- Existing law, the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act, an initiative measure, requires an additional penalty of $1 for every $10 or part thereof to be levied in each county upon every fine, penalty, or forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for all criminal offenses, as specified. The act requires the county board of supervisors to establish in the county treasury a DNA Identification Fund, into which the collected penalties are to be deposited. The act specifies the purposes for which funds in the county's DNA Identification Fund may be used, including to reimburse local sheriff, police, district attorney, and regional state crime laboratories for expenditures and administrative costs made or incurred in connection with the processing, analysis, tracking, and storage of DNA crime scene samples, as specified. The act provides for its amendment by the Legislature if the amendments further the act and are consistent with its purposes to enhance the use of DNA identification evidence for the purpose of accurate and expeditious crime solving and exonerating the innocent. This bill would provide that, if authorized by a resolution of the board of supervisors, a local sheriff or police department, or the district attorney's office, may use funds remaining in the county's DNA Identification Fund, either independently or in combination with remaining funds from another county, to provide supplemental funding to a qualified local or regional state forensic laboratory, as defined, for expenditures and administrative costs made or incurred in connection with the processing, analysis, and comparison of DNA crime scene samples and forensic identification samples, and testimony related to that analysis, as specified. The bill would declare that its provisions further the initiative act, and are consistent with its purposes.
- Who sponsors AB 434?
- AB 434 is sponsored by Logue.
- What is the current status of AB 434?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 434?
- Track AB 434 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 434
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 434
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →