Firearms: possession of assault weapons: law enforcement officers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2549 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2549.
You're tracking AB 2549
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2549 — Firearms: possession of assault weapons: law enforcement officers.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law generally prohibits the possession of an assault weapon, as defined, or a .50 BMG rifle, as defined. Existing law imposes specified penalties for a violation of these provisions, including imprisonment in a county jail for a period not to exceed one year, or a fine, or both imprisonment and a fine, as specified. Existing law does not prohibit the sale, delivery, or transfer of an assault weapon or a .50 BMG rifle to, or the possession of an assault weapon or a .50 BMG rifle by, a sworn peace officer member of a state law enforcement entity if the peace officer is authorized by the officer's employer to possess or receive the assault weapon or the .50 BMG rifle. Existing law defines the required authorization as verifiable written certification from the head of the agency, identifying the recipient or possessor of the assault weapon or the .50 BMG rifle as a peace officer and authorizing that person to receive or possess the specific assault weapon. Existing law also requires the officer to register the weapon, as specified. These requirements do not apply to members of federal law enforcement agencies who are authorized by their employing agency to possess these weapons. This bill would require that the written authorization from an officer's employer necessary to exempt the officer from restrictions on the sale, delivery, transfer, or possession of an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle also include language stating that the use of the assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle is "for law enforcement purposes, whether on or off duty." The bill would require that a peace officer who purchases an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle pursuant to this provision on or after January 1, 2013, be limited to the purchase of one assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle and would prohibit the peace officer from purchasing another assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle pursuant to this provision unless the peace officer has relinquished his or her possession of the original assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle and transferred registration of the weapon out of his or her name. The bill would also require a peace officer who lawfully purchased an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle, either before or after January 1, 2013, and properly registered the firearm in his or her name, as required pursuant to the provisions described above, and who has honorably retired, as defined, from the law enforcement agency, to notify the Department of Justice, within 90 days of the date of retirement, of his or her change in status and continued ownership of the assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle. The bill would specify that an honorably retired peace officer who acquired an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle pursuant to the above provisions and retired prior to January 1, 2013, would not be required to surrender the weapon if he or she provides the notification specified above to the department on or before April 1, 2013. The bill would require the notification to include written documentation from the head of the law enforcement agency from which the officer retired, or a designee of the department head, stating that the officer honorably retired from the agency. The bill would require the Department of Justice to develop a program authorizing a retired officer to file a "change of status" form for purposes of these provisions, and to develop and adopt a form for that purpose. The bill would also authorize the department to charge the retired officer seeking to file that form a fee covering the reasonable cost of providing this service.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/18/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 18, 2012
- Amended 05/21/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 21, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- AB2549 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 19. Page 5144.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (May 2).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Hall · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hall
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 14% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 18 | 0 | 12 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 19 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 24% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 6% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2549 do?
- Existing law generally prohibits the possession of an assault weapon, as defined, or a .50 BMG rifle, as defined. Existing law imposes specified penalties for a violation of these provisions, including imprisonment in a county jail for a period not to exceed one year, or a fine, or both imprisonment and a fine, as specified. Existing law does not prohibit the sale, delivery, or transfer of an assault weapon or a .50 BMG rifle to, or the possession of an assault weapon or a .50 BMG rifle by, a sworn peace officer member of a state law enforcement entity if the peace officer is authorized by the officer's employer to possess or receive the assault weapon or the .50 BMG rifle. Existing law defines the required authorization as verifiable written certification from the head of the agency, identifying the recipient or possessor of the assault weapon or the .50 BMG rifle as a peace officer and authorizing that person to receive or possess the specific assault weapon. Existing law also requires the officer to register the weapon, as specified. These requirements do not apply to members of federal law enforcement agencies who are authorized by their employing agency to possess these weapons. This bill would require that the written authorization from an officer's employer necessary to exempt the officer from restrictions on the sale, delivery, transfer, or possession of an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle also include language stating that the use of the assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle is "for law enforcement purposes, whether on or off duty." The bill would require that a peace officer who purchases an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle pursuant to this provision on or after January 1, 2013, be limited to the purchase of one assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle and would prohibit the peace officer from purchasing another assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle pursuant to this provision unless the peace officer has relinquished his or her possession of the original assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle and transferred registration of the weapon out of his or her name. The bill would also require a peace officer who lawfully purchased an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle, either before or after January 1, 2013, and properly registered the firearm in his or her name, as required pursuant to the provisions described above, and who has honorably retired, as defined, from the law enforcement agency, to notify the Department of Justice, within 90 days of the date of retirement, of his or her change in status and continued ownership of the assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle. The bill would specify that an honorably retired peace officer who acquired an assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle pursuant to the above provisions and retired prior to January 1, 2013, would not be required to surrender the weapon if he or she provides the notification specified above to the department on or before April 1, 2013. The bill would require the notification to include written documentation from the head of the law enforcement agency from which the officer retired, or a designee of the department head, stating that the officer honorably retired from the agency. The bill would require the Department of Justice to develop a program authorizing a retired officer to file a "change of status" form for purposes of these provisions, and to develop and adopt a form for that purpose. The bill would also authorize the department to charge the retired officer seeking to file that form a fee covering the reasonable cost of providing this service.
- Who sponsors AB 2549?
- AB 2549 is sponsored by Hall.
- What is the current status of AB 2549?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2549?
- Track AB 2549 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2549
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2549
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →