Public postsecondary education: employee compensation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 952 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 952.
You're tracking SB 952
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 952 — Public postsecondary education: employee compensation.
Last action — Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. This bill would prohibit, from August 1, 2012, to June 30, 2014, inclusive, the Trustees of the California State University from entering into, or renewing, a contract that provides for a compensation increase for a California State University employee whose annual salary exceeds $200,000 from General Fund sources, as defined, in the fiscal year during which the contract is executed, relative to the immediately prior contract for that same position. The bill would prohibit, on or after July 1, 2014, and until July 1, 2018, the trustees from entering into, or renewing, a contract that provides for a compensation increase of more than 10% for a California State University employee whose annual salary exceeds $200,000 from General Fund sources in the fiscal year during which the contract is executed, relative to the immediately prior contract for that position. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/11/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 11, 2012
- Amended 05/08/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 08, 2012
- Amended 04/16/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 16, 2012
- Amended 03/28/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 28, 2012
- Amended 03/14/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 14, 2012
- Introduced 01/05/12 - Introduced pdf January 05, 2012
- SB952 View text html
Action History
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 3554.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
-
Set for hearing April 30.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 2994.) (March 21).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set for hearing March 21.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 5.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Primary
- Anderson · Cosponsor
- Blakeslee · Cosponsor
- De León · Cosponsor
- Corbett · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Evans · Cosponsor
- Fuller · Cosponsor
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Steinberg · Cosponsor
- Bonnie Lowenthal · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Alquist
Co-sponsors (11)
- Anderson
- Blakeslee
- De León
- Corbett
- DeSaulnier
- Evans
- Fuller
- Hill
- Huff
- Steinberg
- Bonnie Lowenthal
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 0% | 0% | 44% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Total | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 3% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 952 do?
- Existing law establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. This bill would prohibit, from August 1, 2012, to June 30, 2014, inclusive, the Trustees of the California State University from entering into, or renewing, a contract that provides for a compensation increase for a California State University employee whose annual salary exceeds $200,000 from General Fund sources, as defined, in the fiscal year during which the contract is executed, relative to the immediately prior contract for that same position. The bill would prohibit, on or after July 1, 2014, and until July 1, 2018, the trustees from entering into, or renewing, a contract that provides for a compensation increase of more than 10% for a California State University employee whose annual salary exceeds $200,000 from General Fund sources in the fiscal year during which the contract is executed, relative to the immediately prior contract for that position. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 952?
- SB 952 is sponsored by Alquist, Anderson, Blakeslee, De León, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuller, Hill, Huff, Steinberg, and Bonnie Lowenthal.
- What is the current status of SB 952?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 952?
- Track SB 952 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 952
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 952
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →