Public utilities: natural gas pipelines: safety.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 578 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 578.
You're tracking AB 578
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 578 — Public utilities: natural gas pipelines: safety.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 462, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities. The Public Utilities Act authorizes the commission to ascertain and fix just and reasonable standards, classifications, regulations, practices, measurements, or services to be furnished, imposed, observed, and followed by specified public utilities, including gas corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 2011 designates the commission as the state authority responsible for regulating and enforcing intrastate gas pipeline transportation and pipeline facilities pursuant to federal law, including the development, submission, and administration of a state pipeline safety program certification for natural gas pipelines. When the federal National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) submits a safety recommendation letter concerning gas pipeline safety to the commission, this bill would require the commission, within 90 days, to provide the NTSB with a formal written response to each recommendation stating: (1) the commission's intent to implement the recommendations in full, with a proposed timetable for implementation of the recommendations, (2) the commission's intent to implement part of the recommendations, with a proposed timetable for implementation of those recommendations, and detailed reasons for the commission's refusal to implement those recommendations that the commission does not intend to implement, or (3) the commission's refusal to implement the recommendations, with detailed reasons for the commission's refusal to implement the recommendations. When the NTSB issues a safety recommendation letter concerning any commission-regulated gas pipeline facility to the United States Department of Transportation, the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) , a gas corporation, or to the commission, or the PHMSA issues an advisory bulletin concerning any commission-regulated gas pipeline facility, the bill would require the commission to determine if implementation of the recommendation or advisory is appropriate and further require that the basis for the commission's determination be detailed in writing and be approved by a majority vote of the commission. If the commission determines that a safety recommendation made by the NTSB is appropriate or that action concerning an advisory bulletin by the PHMSA is necessary, the bill would require that the commission issue orders or adopt rules to implement the safety recommendations or advisory as soon as practical and to consider whether a more effective, or equally effective and less costly, alternative exists to address the safety issue that the recommendation or advisory addresses. The bill would require the commission to include a detailed description of any action taken on an NTSB safety recommendation, or to implement an advisory bulletin, in a specified annual report the commission is required to make to the Legislature. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require the commission to issue orders or adopt rules to implement any safety recommendation by the NTSB relative to natural gas pipeline safety that the commission determines to be appropriate and a violation of these orders or rules would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2012
- Enrolled 09/11/12 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2012
- Amended 05/30/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 30, 2012
- Amended 05/08/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 08, 2012
- Amended 01/12/12 - Amended Assembly pdf January 12, 2012
- Amended 01/04/12 - Amended Assembly pdf January 04, 2012
- Introduced 02/16/11 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2011
- AB578 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 462, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:15 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 1. Page 6614.).
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (August 29).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 6587.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4869.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 15).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 57. Noes 19. Page 3624.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (January 19).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (January 9).
-
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on G.O. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 0% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 56 | 17 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 19 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 578 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities. The Public Utilities Act authorizes the commission to ascertain and fix just and reasonable standards, classifications, regulations, practices, measurements, or services to be furnished, imposed, observed, and followed by specified public utilities, including gas corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 2011 designates the commission as the state authority responsible for regulating and enforcing intrastate gas pipeline transportation and pipeline facilities pursuant to federal law, including the development, submission, and administration of a state pipeline safety program certification for natural gas pipelines. When the federal National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) submits a safety recommendation letter concerning gas pipeline safety to the commission, this bill would require the commission, within 90 days, to provide the NTSB with a formal written response to each recommendation stating: (1) the commission's intent to implement the recommendations in full, with a proposed timetable for implementation of the recommendations, (2) the commission's intent to implement part of the recommendations, with a proposed timetable for implementation of those recommendations, and detailed reasons for the commission's refusal to implement those recommendations that the commission does not intend to implement, or (3) the commission's refusal to implement the recommendations, with detailed reasons for the commission's refusal to implement the recommendations. When the NTSB issues a safety recommendation letter concerning any commission-regulated gas pipeline facility to the United States Department of Transportation, the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) , a gas corporation, or to the commission, or the PHMSA issues an advisory bulletin concerning any commission-regulated gas pipeline facility, the bill would require the commission to determine if implementation of the recommendation or advisory is appropriate and further require that the basis for the commission's determination be detailed in writing and be approved by a majority vote of the commission. If the commission determines that a safety recommendation made by the NTSB is appropriate or that action concerning an advisory bulletin by the PHMSA is necessary, the bill would require that the commission issue orders or adopt rules to implement the safety recommendations or advisory as soon as practical and to consider whether a more effective, or equally effective and less costly, alternative exists to address the safety issue that the recommendation or advisory addresses. The bill would require the commission to include a detailed description of any action taken on an NTSB safety recommendation, or to implement an advisory bulletin, in a specified annual report the commission is required to make to the Legislature. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require the commission to issue orders or adopt rules to implement any safety recommendation by the NTSB relative to natural gas pipeline safety that the commission determines to be appropriate and a violation of these orders or rules would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 578?
- AB 578 is sponsored by Hill.
- What is the current status of AB 578?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 578?
- Track AB 578 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 578
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 578
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →