California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 103 — State cash resources.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 13, Statutes of 2012.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the Controller to draw warrants on the State Treasury in each month of each year in specified amounts for the purpose of funding, among other entities, charter schools and school districts. Existing law defers the drawing of those warrants, as specified, but, commencing with the 2010–11 fiscal year, authorizes the payment of up to $100,000,000 of funds that would otherwise be deferred for the month of June under certain conditions. Existing law limits the amount that a charter school or school district may receive under this provision to no more than the lesser of the total amount of additional funds necessary for the charter school or school district to meet its financial obligations for the month of June, as specified, or the total payments that charter school or school district is entitled to receive in July for the prior fiscal year. This bill, for the 2011–12 fiscal year only, instead would limit the amount that a charter school or school district may receive under this provision to the amount of additional funds necessary for the charter school or school district to meet its financial obligations for the month of June, as specified. (2) Existing law, until September 1, 2012, declares the need for an effective cash management program for the 2010–11 and 2011–12 fiscal years, and exempts activities to implement and carry out the cash management plan from the Administrative Procedure Act. This bill would extend these provisions through the 2012–13 fiscal year. (3) Existing law, for the 2010–11 and 2011–12 fiscal years, prohibits payments made by the state to the University of California and the California State University from exceeding 112 of the annual appropriation for each month from July through April. This bill would extend that prohibition through the 2012–13 fiscal year and would exclude from the prohibition transfers and rental payments that support lease-revenue bonds. (4) Existing law, until September 1, 2012, enacts the cash management plan to authorize the Controller, Treasurer, and Director of Finance to defer General Fund payments for up to 60 or 90 days, as specified, for specific entities, including county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools, subject to certain conditions. Existing law provides a process by which county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools may receive payments that would otherwise be deferred, permits those entities to apply for a hardship waiver even if earlier payments were deferred. Existing law prohibits the total amount of deferrals to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools from exceeding $2,500,000,000 at any given time and requires the Controller, Treasurer, and Director of Finance to determine and jointly provide a written declaration of the amounts and timing of payment deferrals for the 2010–11 fiscal year to the Legislature and to the State Department of Education, and requires the State Department of Education to provide this information to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools no later than March 31, 2010. This bill would eliminate the limit of $2,500,000,000 in deferrals to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools. The bill would, for the 2012–13 fiscal year, provide for deferrals and repayment of those deferrals for kindergarten to grade 12, inclusive, and would provide that a county office of education, a charter school, or a school district may receive scheduled payments from the Controller if payments are deferred and a certification is made on or before June 1, 2012, that the deferral of warrants will result in the county office of education being unable to meet its expenditure obligations for the time period in which payments are deferred, as specified. The bill would also provide a process for a county office of education, a charter school, or a school district to seek a hardship waiver for the March 2013 deferral. The bill would also require payment of the March 2013 deferral to the county offices of education, school districts, and charter schools to be made no later than April 29, 2013. (5) Existing law requires the Controller, subject to the approval of the Department of Finance, to pay the full amount of the apportionment payments for March 2010 for a community college for which the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges determines, in consultation with the Director of Finance, on or before March 15, 2010, that a deferral of payment would present an imminent threat to the fiscal integrity and security of the community colleges. This bill would, for the 2012–13 fiscal year, require the deferrals of apportionments to community college districts in the amounts of $150,000,000 to be made from July to December, $50,000,000 to be made from September to January, and $100,000,000 to be made from October to January. The bill would require the Controller to issue warrants that include the full apportionment of payments for the months of July, September, or October, or any combination of those months, for a community college for which the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges determines, in consultation with the Director of Finance, on or before June 1 of the preceding fiscal year that deferral of warrants will present an imminent threat to the fiscal integrity and security of the community college. This bill would also repeal obsolete provisions regarding the deferral of certain payments. (6) Existing law requires all money received by the state as litigation deposits, except as specified, to be deposited in the Litigation Deposits Fund in the State Treasury. Existing law authorizes the investment and reinvestment of those funds and requires all revenues earned from the investment or deposit of fund moneys to be deposited in the fund. Existing law charges the Department of Justice with control of the fund, as specified. This bill would authorize the Controller to use money in the fund for cashflow loans to the General Fund, as specified. (7) Existing law establishes a system of public elementary and secondary schools in this state. This system of public elementary and secondary schools is funded through, among other means, the apportionment of state funds by the Superintendent of Public Instruction to local educational agencies in accordance with statutory formulas and the receipt of property tax revenues by those local educational agencies. This bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to delay the 2nd principal apportionment for the 2011–12 fiscal year from July 2, 2012, to July 15, 2012, to account for additional local property tax revenues remitted to school districts and county offices of education pursuant to a specified statute. The bill would require each county auditor-controller to provide the Superintendent of Public Instruction by June 10, 2012, with a report detailing the amount of additional property tax received pursuant to this specified statute by each school district and county office of education in their respective jurisdictions, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (9) This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Controller for administrative costs associated with this bill. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 13, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 27. Page 4877.).

  5. From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 14. Noes 9.) (May 15).

  6. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after May 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 3424.).

  9. Motion to take up the bill without reference to file. (Ayes 24. Noes 10. Page 3424.)

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (May 3).

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  13. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  14. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  17. Ordered to second reading.

  18. From inactive file.

  19. Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Leno.

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  22. Measure version as amended on June 12 corrected.

  23. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  24. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  25. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  26. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  27. Measure version as amended on March 17 corrected.

  28. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  29. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  30. Ordered to third reading.

  31. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (March 16).

  32. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  33. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  34. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  35. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  36. Ordered to second reading.

  37. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  38. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 0. Page 417.)

  39. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  40. Without reference to committee.

  41. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  42. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 103 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 47 Yea · 27 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 462506
Democratic 1000
Republican 0200
Total 472706
% of votes cast 59%34%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Davis — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Perea — Not Voting
Skinner — Not Voting
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Not Voting
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Valadao — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Yamada — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

amendments be concurred in.

Passed 14 Yea · 9 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14704
Republican 0200
Total 14904
% of votes cast 52%33%0%15%
How each member voted (27)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Butler — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Valadao — Not Voting
Cedillo — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Monning — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Not Voting
Buchanan — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

2nd Reading AB103 Committee on BUDGET (Blumenfield) By Leno

Passed 34 Yea · 2 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32203
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 34204
% of votes cast 85%5%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harman — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 3 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9304
Total 9304
% of votes cast 56%19%0%25%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Simitian — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Anderson — Not Voting
Wright — Not Voting
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Total 11500
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

AB 103 BUDGET Assembly Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay · 30 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 460028
Democratic 3000
Republican 0002
Total 490030
% of votes cast 62%0%0%38%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Not Voting
Furutani — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Perea — Yea
Williams — Yea
Butler — Not Voting
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Lara — Yea
Beall — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Not Voting
Nestande — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Olsen — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Swanson — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Not Voting
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 103 do?
(1) Existing law requires the Controller to draw warrants on the State Treasury in each month of each year in specified amounts for the purpose of funding, among other entities, charter schools and school districts. Existing law defers the drawing of those warrants, as specified, but, commencing with the 2010–11 fiscal year, authorizes the payment of up to $100,000,000 of funds that would otherwise be deferred for the month of June under certain conditions. Existing law limits the amount that a charter school or school district may receive under this provision to no more than the lesser of the total amount of additional funds necessary for the charter school or school district to meet its financial obligations for the month of June, as specified, or the total payments that charter school or school district is entitled to receive in July for the prior fiscal year. This bill, for the 2011–12 fiscal year only, instead would limit the amount that a charter school or school district may receive under this provision to the amount of additional funds necessary for the charter school or school district to meet its financial obligations for the month of June, as specified. (2) Existing law, until September 1, 2012, declares the need for an effective cash management program for the 2010–11 and 2011–12 fiscal years, and exempts activities to implement and carry out the cash management plan from the Administrative Procedure Act. This bill would extend these provisions through the 2012–13 fiscal year. (3) Existing law, for the 2010–11 and 2011–12 fiscal years, prohibits payments made by the state to the University of California and the California State University from exceeding 112 of the annual appropriation for each month from July through April. This bill would extend that prohibition through the 2012–13 fiscal year and would exclude from the prohibition transfers and rental payments that support lease-revenue bonds. (4) Existing law, until September 1, 2012, enacts the cash management plan to authorize the Controller, Treasurer, and Director of Finance to defer General Fund payments for up to 60 or 90 days, as specified, for specific entities, including county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools, subject to certain conditions. Existing law provides a process by which county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools may receive payments that would otherwise be deferred, permits those entities to apply for a hardship waiver even if earlier payments were deferred. Existing law prohibits the total amount of deferrals to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools from exceeding $2,500,000,000 at any given time and requires the Controller, Treasurer, and Director of Finance to determine and jointly provide a written declaration of the amounts and timing of payment deferrals for the 2010–11 fiscal year to the Legislature and to the State Department of Education, and requires the State Department of Education to provide this information to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools no later than March 31, 2010. This bill would eliminate the limit of $2,500,000,000 in deferrals to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools. The bill would, for the 2012–13 fiscal year, provide for deferrals and repayment of those deferrals for kindergarten to grade 12, inclusive, and would provide that a county office of education, a charter school, or a school district may receive scheduled payments from the Controller if payments are deferred and a certification is made on or before June 1, 2012, that the deferral of warrants will result in the county office of education being unable to meet its expenditure obligations for the time period in which payments are deferred, as specified. The bill would also provide a process for a county office of education, a charter school, or a school district to seek a hardship waiver for the March 2013 deferral. The bill would also require payment of the March 2013 deferral to the county offices of education, school districts, and charter schools to be made no later than April 29, 2013. (5) Existing law requires the Controller, subject to the approval of the Department of Finance, to pay the full amount of the apportionment payments for March 2010 for a community college for which the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges determines, in consultation with the Director of Finance, on or before March 15, 2010, that a deferral of payment would present an imminent threat to the fiscal integrity and security of the community colleges. This bill would, for the 2012–13 fiscal year, require the deferrals of apportionments to community college districts in the amounts of $150,000,000 to be made from July to December, $50,000,000 to be made from September to January, and $100,000,000 to be made from October to January. The bill would require the Controller to issue warrants that include the full apportionment of payments for the months of July, September, or October, or any combination of those months, for a community college for which the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges determines, in consultation with the Director of Finance, on or before June 1 of the preceding fiscal year that deferral of warrants will present an imminent threat to the fiscal integrity and security of the community college. This bill would also repeal obsolete provisions regarding the deferral of certain payments. (6) Existing law requires all money received by the state as litigation deposits, except as specified, to be deposited in the Litigation Deposits Fund in the State Treasury. Existing law authorizes the investment and reinvestment of those funds and requires all revenues earned from the investment or deposit of fund moneys to be deposited in the fund. Existing law charges the Department of Justice with control of the fund, as specified. This bill would authorize the Controller to use money in the fund for cashflow loans to the General Fund, as specified. (7) Existing law establishes a system of public elementary and secondary schools in this state. This system of public elementary and secondary schools is funded through, among other means, the apportionment of state funds by the Superintendent of Public Instruction to local educational agencies in accordance with statutory formulas and the receipt of property tax revenues by those local educational agencies. This bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to delay the 2nd principal apportionment for the 2011–12 fiscal year from July 2, 2012, to July 15, 2012, to account for additional local property tax revenues remitted to school districts and county offices of education pursuant to a specified statute. The bill would require each county auditor-controller to provide the Superintendent of Public Instruction by June 10, 2012, with a report detailing the amount of additional property tax received pursuant to this specified statute by each school district and county office of education in their respective jurisdictions, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (9) This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Controller for administrative costs associated with this bill. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 103?
AB 103 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 103?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 103?
Track AB 103 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 103

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 103

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →