Department of Consumer Affairs: construction defect solicitations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1892 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1892.
You're tracking AB 1892
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1892 — Department of Consumer Affairs: construction defect solicitations.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Department of Consumer Affairs is comprised of boards that license and regulate various professions and vocations. Existing law provides that these boards are established to ensure that private businesses and professions are regulated to protect the people of this state. Under existing law, the department is under the control of the Director of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires the director to administer and enforce the provisions of the Consumer Affairs Act, the intent of which is to promote and protect the interests of the people as consumers. Existing law also specifies the rights of a homeowner to bring an action against a builder for construction defects, including the applicable standards for home construction, the statute of limitations, the burden of proof, the damages recoverable, prelitigation procedures, and the obligations of the homeowner. This bill would require the department to post a notice on its Internet Web site advising a consumer who receives a construction defect solicitation to check with his or her builder in addition to taking other further action.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/29/12 - Enrolled Current pdf August 29, 2012
- Amended 04/16/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 16, 2012
- Introduced 02/22/12 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2012
- AB1892 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4782.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 4889.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 9).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Halderman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Halderman
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 72 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1892 do?
- Under existing law, the Department of Consumer Affairs is comprised of boards that license and regulate various professions and vocations. Existing law provides that these boards are established to ensure that private businesses and professions are regulated to protect the people of this state. Under existing law, the department is under the control of the Director of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires the director to administer and enforce the provisions of the Consumer Affairs Act, the intent of which is to promote and protect the interests of the people as consumers. Existing law also specifies the rights of a homeowner to bring an action against a builder for construction defects, including the applicable standards for home construction, the statute of limitations, the burden of proof, the damages recoverable, prelitigation procedures, and the obligations of the homeowner. This bill would require the department to post a notice on its Internet Web site advising a consumer who receives a construction defect solicitation to check with his or her builder in addition to taking other further action.
- Who sponsors AB 1892?
- AB 1892 is sponsored by Halderman.
- What is the current status of AB 1892?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1892?
- Track AB 1892 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1892
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1892
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →