California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1909 — Foster children: placement: suspension and expulsion: notifications.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 849, Statutes of 2012.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires each local educational agency to designate a staff person as the educational liaison for foster children, as defined. Existing law requires the educational liaison to ensure and facilitate the proper educational placement, enrollment in school, and checkout from school of foster children, and to assist foster children when transferring from one school to another school or from one school district to another school district in ensuring the proper transfer of credits, records, and grades. This bill would require the educational liaison, if designated by the superintendent of the local educational agency, to notify the foster child's attorney and the appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency of pending expulsion proceedings if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act, pending proceedings to extend a suspension until an expulsion decision is rendered if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act, and, if the foster child is an individual with exceptional needs, pending manifestation determinations, as specified. This bill would authorize the foster child's caregiver or other person holding the right to make educational decisions for the child to provide the contact information of the child's attorney to the child's school district when the child has been placed outside of the county of jurisdiction for the child. (2) Existing law authorizes the district superintendent of schools or other person designated by the district superintendent of schools in writing to extend the suspension of a pupil until the governing board of the school district has rendered a decision in a case where expulsion from any school or suspension from the balance of the semester from continuation school is being processed by the governing board of the school district. Existing law requires that before such an extension is granted that the district superintendent of schools or the district superintendent's designee determine, following a meeting in which the pupil and the pupil's parent or guardian are invited to participate, that the presence of the pupil at the school or in an alternative school placement would cause a danger to persons or property or a threat of disrupting the instructional process. This bill would require, if the pupil is a foster child, as defined, the district superintendent of schools or the district superintendent's designee to invite the pupil's attorney and the appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency to that meeting. (3) Existing law authorizes the suspension or expulsion of an individual with exceptional needs in accordance with specified provisions. This bill would require, if the individual with exceptional needs is a foster child, as defined, and the local educational agency has proposed a change of placement due to an act for which a decision to recommend expulsion is at the discretion of the principal or the district superintendent of schools, the attorney for the individual with exceptional needs and the appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency to be invited to participate in the individualized education program team meeting that makes a manifestation determination. The bill would authorize that invitation to be made using the most cost-effective method possible. (4) Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish rules and regulations governing procedures for the expulsion of pupils and requires these procedures to include, but not necessarily be limited to, a hearing to determine whether the pupil should be expelled, and a written notice of the hearing forwarded to the pupil at least 10 calendar days prior to the date of the hearing. This bill would require, if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act and the pupil is a foster child, as defined, the governing board of the school district also to provide notice of the hearing to the pupil's attorney and an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency at least 10 calendar days before the date of the hearing. The bill would authorize, if a recommendation of expulsion is required and the pupil is a foster child, the governing board of the school district also to provide the notice of the hearing to the pupil's attorney and an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency at least 10 calendar days before the date of the hearing. The bill would authorize these notices to be made using the most cost-effective method possible. (5) Existing law requires a juvenile court to hold a detention hearing to determine whether a minor should be further detained when a minor has been taken into custody pursuant to specified provisions. Existing law also requires a court to appoint counsel for the child if the child is not represented by counsel, unless the court finds that the child would not benefit from the appointment of counsel. Existing law requires counsel appointed for the child to be charged in general with the representation of the child's interests. This bill would, at least once every year and if the list of educational liaisons is available on the Internet Web site of the State Department of Education, (A) require counsel appointed for the child to provide his or her contact information to the educational liaison of each local educational agency serving counsel's foster child clients in the county of jurisdiction, and (B) if counsel is part of a firm or organization, authorize the firm or organization to provide its contact information in lieu of contact information for the individual counsel. The bill would authorize the child's caregiver or other person holding the right to make educational decisions for the child to provide the contact information of the child's attorney to the child's local educational agency. (6) Existing law requires, when a child is placed in foster care, the case plan for each child to include a summary of the health and education information or records of the child. Existing law requires the health and education summary to include, but not be limited to, among other things, the names and addresses of the child's health, dental, and education providers. This bill would authorize the health and education summary also to include the name and contact information for the educational liaison of the child's local educational agency. (7) This bill would also make various nonsubstantive changes to the above provisions. (8) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 48853.5 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 1568, to be operative only if SB 1568 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 317 and 16010 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by AB 1712, to be operative only if AB 1712 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 849, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6650.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6605.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4942.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 2).

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUMAN S. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.

  15. Referred to Coms. on ED. and HUMAN S.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5052.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).

  20. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  21. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  22. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  23. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 9).

  24. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  26. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  27. Referred to Coms. on JUD. and ED.

  28. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  29. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ammiano · Primary
  • Brownley · Cosponsor
  • Chesbro · Cosponsor
  • Vargas · Cosponsor
  • Wieckowski · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Ammiano

Co-sponsors (4)

  • Brownley
  • Chesbro
  • Vargas
  • Wieckowski

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 77000
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Miller — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Conway — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Block — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 33 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30007
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 33007
% of votes cast 83%0%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5001
Republican 1000
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wright — Yea
Liu — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 74003
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Garrick — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hagman — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huber — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Miller — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Norby — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0001
Unaffiliated 10000
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Williams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Norby — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eng — Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1909 do?
(1) Existing law requires each local educational agency to designate a staff person as the educational liaison for foster children, as defined. Existing law requires the educational liaison to ensure and facilitate the proper educational placement, enrollment in school, and checkout from school of foster children, and to assist foster children when transferring from one school to another school or from one school district to another school district in ensuring the proper transfer of credits, records, and grades. This bill would require the educational liaison, if designated by the superintendent of the local educational agency, to notify the foster child's attorney and the appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency of pending expulsion proceedings if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act, pending proceedings to extend a suspension until an expulsion decision is rendered if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act, and, if the foster child is an individual with exceptional needs, pending manifestation determinations, as specified. This bill would authorize the foster child's caregiver or other person holding the right to make educational decisions for the child to provide the contact information of the child's attorney to the child's school district when the child has been placed outside of the county of jurisdiction for the child. (2) Existing law authorizes the district superintendent of schools or other person designated by the district superintendent of schools in writing to extend the suspension of a pupil until the governing board of the school district has rendered a decision in a case where expulsion from any school or suspension from the balance of the semester from continuation school is being processed by the governing board of the school district. Existing law requires that before such an extension is granted that the district superintendent of schools or the district superintendent's designee determine, following a meeting in which the pupil and the pupil's parent or guardian are invited to participate, that the presence of the pupil at the school or in an alternative school placement would cause a danger to persons or property or a threat of disrupting the instructional process. This bill would require, if the pupil is a foster child, as defined, the district superintendent of schools or the district superintendent's designee to invite the pupil's attorney and the appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency to that meeting. (3) Existing law authorizes the suspension or expulsion of an individual with exceptional needs in accordance with specified provisions. This bill would require, if the individual with exceptional needs is a foster child, as defined, and the local educational agency has proposed a change of placement due to an act for which a decision to recommend expulsion is at the discretion of the principal or the district superintendent of schools, the attorney for the individual with exceptional needs and the appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency to be invited to participate in the individualized education program team meeting that makes a manifestation determination. The bill would authorize that invitation to be made using the most cost-effective method possible. (4) Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish rules and regulations governing procedures for the expulsion of pupils and requires these procedures to include, but not necessarily be limited to, a hearing to determine whether the pupil should be expelled, and a written notice of the hearing forwarded to the pupil at least 10 calendar days prior to the date of the hearing. This bill would require, if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act and the pupil is a foster child, as defined, the governing board of the school district also to provide notice of the hearing to the pupil's attorney and an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency at least 10 calendar days before the date of the hearing. The bill would authorize, if a recommendation of expulsion is required and the pupil is a foster child, the governing board of the school district also to provide the notice of the hearing to the pupil's attorney and an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency at least 10 calendar days before the date of the hearing. The bill would authorize these notices to be made using the most cost-effective method possible. (5) Existing law requires a juvenile court to hold a detention hearing to determine whether a minor should be further detained when a minor has been taken into custody pursuant to specified provisions. Existing law also requires a court to appoint counsel for the child if the child is not represented by counsel, unless the court finds that the child would not benefit from the appointment of counsel. Existing law requires counsel appointed for the child to be charged in general with the representation of the child's interests. This bill would, at least once every year and if the list of educational liaisons is available on the Internet Web site of the State Department of Education, (A) require counsel appointed for the child to provide his or her contact information to the educational liaison of each local educational agency serving counsel's foster child clients in the county of jurisdiction, and (B) if counsel is part of a firm or organization, authorize the firm or organization to provide its contact information in lieu of contact information for the individual counsel. The bill would authorize the child's caregiver or other person holding the right to make educational decisions for the child to provide the contact information of the child's attorney to the child's local educational agency. (6) Existing law requires, when a child is placed in foster care, the case plan for each child to include a summary of the health and education information or records of the child. Existing law requires the health and education summary to include, but not be limited to, among other things, the names and addresses of the child's health, dental, and education providers. This bill would authorize the health and education summary also to include the name and contact information for the educational liaison of the child's local educational agency. (7) This bill would also make various nonsubstantive changes to the above provisions. (8) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 48853.5 of the Education Code, proposed by SB 1568, to be operative only if SB 1568 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 317 and 16010 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by AB 1712, to be operative only if AB 1712 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 1909?
AB 1909 is sponsored by Ammiano, Brownley, Chesbro, Vargas, and Wieckowski.
What is the current status of AB 1909?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1909?
Track AB 1909 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1909

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1909

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →