Public health: Medi-Cal: skilled nursing facility and managed care plan charges.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1469 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1469.
You're tracking AB 1469
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1469 — Public health: Medi-Cal: skilled nursing facility and managed care plan charges.
Last action — Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires the department to impose a uniform quality assurance fee on each skilled nursing facility, with certain exceptions, in accordance with a prescribed formula. The formula is based on the determination of the projected net revenues, as defined, of skilled nursing facilities. Under existing law, the charge will cease to be assessed after July 31, 2013, and these provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2014. Existing law, the Medi-Cal Long-Term Care Reimbursement Act, requires the department to implement a facility-specific reimbursement ratesetting system for certain skilled nursing facilities. Reimbursement rates for freestanding skilled nursing facilities are funded by a combination of federal funds and moneys collected pursuant to the skilled nursing uniform quality assurance fee. Existing law also establishes the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund in the State Treasury, which is a continuously appropriated fund that contains moneys from the assessment of specified administrative penalties and set asides of General Fund moneys, for the purposes of making quality and accountability payments. Existing law provides that this rate methodology shall cease to be implemented after July 31, 2013, and that these provisions shall be repealed on January 1, 2014. This bill would modify the calculation of rates under the above-referenced rate methodology, and would extend the assessment of the charge, implementation of the rate methodology, and implementation of related provisions until July 31, 2015. By extending the period of time during which transfers are made to the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would also modify the amount of moneys to be deposited into the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund, by, among other things, requiring that specified set-asides under the rate methodology remain in the General Fund instead of transferring to the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund and increasing the amount of certain set-asides to be transferred to the fund. This bill would instead require that the quality and accountability payments be made beginning with the 2013–14 rate year. (2) Existing federal Medicaid law requires nursing facilities, as defined, to perform an assessment of each resident's functional capacity that is based on a uniform minimum data set, as specified. This bill would require nursing facilities, the State Department of Health Care Services, and the State Department of Public Health to perform various duties with respect to the federal government's nursing home quality initiative and this assessment. (3) Under existing law, one of the methods by which Medi-Cal services are provided is through contracts with various types of managed care plans. Existing law imposes a tax at a specified rate on the gross premiums of an insurer, as defined, and, until July 1, 2012, on the total operating revenue, as specified, of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, as defined. Existing law exempts from that tax the total operating revenue of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, if specified events occur before July, 1, 2012. Existing law continuously appropriates the revenues derived from the tax on Medi-Cal managed care plans for specified purposes. This bill would extend the imposition of the tax on the total operating revenue of Medi-Cal managed care plans until July 1, 2014, and would make other conforming changes. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2013, allocate the sum of $15 million dollars from the revenues derived after July 1, 2012, to the State Department of Health Care Services for the purpose of creating a performance-based incentive payment program for specified Medi-Cal managed care plans. This bill also would authorize the Controller to loan funds in the Children's Health and Human Services Special Fund to the General Fund, as provided, until July 1, 2014. By extending the imposition of a charge whose revenues are continuously appropriated, this bill would make an appropriation. (4) Existing law requires, until July 1, 2012, every return required to be filed with the Insurance Commissioner pursuant to provisions governing taxes on the total operating revenue of Medi-Cal managed care plans to be signed by the insurer or the Medi-Cal managed care plan or an executive officer of the insurer or the plan and to be made under oath or contain a written declaration that is made under penalty of perjury. This bill would instead apply this signature requirement until July 1, 2014. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Section 92 of Chapter 11 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2011 provides that the act becomes inoperative if any of its provisions are amended or repealed. This bill would repeal that provision and would provide that, notwithstanding Section 92 of Chapter 11 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2011, the provisions of Chapter 11 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2011 do not become inoperative upon the amendment or repeal of any provision of that chapter made by this bill. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/22/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 22, 2012
- Amended 08/21/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 21, 2012
- Amended 06/25/12 - Amended Senate pdf June 25, 2012
- Introduced 01/10/12 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2012
- AB1469 View text html
Action History
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (June 25).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 23. Page 4085.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 46. Noes 24. Page 4011.)
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 46. Noes 24. Page 4011.)
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 6% | 0% | 31% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 21 | 0 | 10 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 23 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 29% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1469 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires the department to impose a uniform quality assurance fee on each skilled nursing facility, with certain exceptions, in accordance with a prescribed formula. The formula is based on the determination of the projected net revenues, as defined, of skilled nursing facilities. Under existing law, the charge will cease to be assessed after July 31, 2013, and these provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2014. Existing law, the Medi-Cal Long-Term Care Reimbursement Act, requires the department to implement a facility-specific reimbursement ratesetting system for certain skilled nursing facilities. Reimbursement rates for freestanding skilled nursing facilities are funded by a combination of federal funds and moneys collected pursuant to the skilled nursing uniform quality assurance fee. Existing law also establishes the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund in the State Treasury, which is a continuously appropriated fund that contains moneys from the assessment of specified administrative penalties and set asides of General Fund moneys, for the purposes of making quality and accountability payments. Existing law provides that this rate methodology shall cease to be implemented after July 31, 2013, and that these provisions shall be repealed on January 1, 2014. This bill would modify the calculation of rates under the above-referenced rate methodology, and would extend the assessment of the charge, implementation of the rate methodology, and implementation of related provisions until July 31, 2015. By extending the period of time during which transfers are made to the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would also modify the amount of moneys to be deposited into the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund, by, among other things, requiring that specified set-asides under the rate methodology remain in the General Fund instead of transferring to the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Special Fund and increasing the amount of certain set-asides to be transferred to the fund. This bill would instead require that the quality and accountability payments be made beginning with the 2013–14 rate year. (2) Existing federal Medicaid law requires nursing facilities, as defined, to perform an assessment of each resident's functional capacity that is based on a uniform minimum data set, as specified. This bill would require nursing facilities, the State Department of Health Care Services, and the State Department of Public Health to perform various duties with respect to the federal government's nursing home quality initiative and this assessment. (3) Under existing law, one of the methods by which Medi-Cal services are provided is through contracts with various types of managed care plans. Existing law imposes a tax at a specified rate on the gross premiums of an insurer, as defined, and, until July 1, 2012, on the total operating revenue, as specified, of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, as defined. Existing law exempts from that tax the total operating revenue of a Medi-Cal managed care plan, if specified events occur before July, 1, 2012. Existing law continuously appropriates the revenues derived from the tax on Medi-Cal managed care plans for specified purposes. This bill would extend the imposition of the tax on the total operating revenue of Medi-Cal managed care plans until July 1, 2014, and would make other conforming changes. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2013, allocate the sum of $15 million dollars from the revenues derived after July 1, 2012, to the State Department of Health Care Services for the purpose of creating a performance-based incentive payment program for specified Medi-Cal managed care plans. This bill also would authorize the Controller to loan funds in the Children's Health and Human Services Special Fund to the General Fund, as provided, until July 1, 2014. By extending the imposition of a charge whose revenues are continuously appropriated, this bill would make an appropriation. (4) Existing law requires, until July 1, 2012, every return required to be filed with the Insurance Commissioner pursuant to provisions governing taxes on the total operating revenue of Medi-Cal managed care plans to be signed by the insurer or the Medi-Cal managed care plan or an executive officer of the insurer or the plan and to be made under oath or contain a written declaration that is made under penalty of perjury. This bill would instead apply this signature requirement until July 1, 2014. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Section 92 of Chapter 11 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2011 provides that the act becomes inoperative if any of its provisions are amended or repealed. This bill would repeal that provision and would provide that, notwithstanding Section 92 of Chapter 11 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2011, the provisions of Chapter 11 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2011 do not become inoperative upon the amendment or repeal of any provision of that chapter made by this bill. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1469?
- AB 1469 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
- What is the current status of AB 1469?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1469?
- Track AB 1469 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1469
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1469
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →