California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SB 1064 — Child custody: immigration.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 845, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 11 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Under existing law, a child who is removed from the physical custody of his or her parent or parents in dissolution, dependency, or probate guardianship proceedings may be placed with a parent, relative, legal guardian, or other specified persons or in specified placement homes or facilities. When a child is placed with his or her relative during dependency proceedings and the relative is not a licensed or certified foster parent, existing law requires a county social worker to visit the relative's home, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check of the relative through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of the assessment. This bill would permit a court to place a child in any of those proceedings with a parent, legal guardian, or relative regardless of the immigration status of the parent, legal guardian, or relative. This bill would also permit a relative's foreign consulate identification card or foreign passport to be used for initiating the criminal records and fingerprint clearance checks. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law sets forth the procedure for terminating the parental rights of a dependent child, including regular review hearings before a court may order a hearing to terminate parental rights. Under existing law, a court may continue these review hearings if it finds that there is a substantial probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the extended period of time or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or legal guardian. This bill would authorize a court to extend the review hearing periods following consideration of the parent's circumstances if a parent has been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained by the United States Department of Homeland Security, or deported to his or her country of origin, and, under these circumstances would authorize a court to continue the case only if the court finds that there is a substantial probability, as defined, that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent and safely maintained in the home within the extended time period or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or guardian. (3) Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services, which oversees the administration of county public social services, including child welfare services. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to provide guidance on best practices and to facilitate an exchange of information and best practices among counties on an annual basis, beginning no later than January 1, 2014, on establishing memoranda of understanding with foreign consulates in juvenile court cases, including procedures for contacting a consulate, accessing a child's documentation, locating a detained parent, assisting in family reunification after a parent has been deported, aiding the safe transfer of a child to the parent's country of origin, and communicating with relevant departments and services in a parent's country of origin, and procedures to assist children in juvenile court cases who are eligible for special immigrant juvenile status and other specified visas. (4) The bill would change references in the above-described provisions from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the United States Department of Homeland Security, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 3040 of the Family Code proposed by SB 1476 that would become operative only if SB 1476 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2060 that would become operative only if either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 2209 that would become operative only if AB 2209 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (8) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 361.5 and 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and SB 1521 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 366.21, 366.22, and 366.25 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2292 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (10) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 388 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 that would become operative only if AB 1712 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 845, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 4. Page 4969.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 65. Noes 6. Page 6448.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 49. Noes 20. Page 6275.)

  9. Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Page 6273.)

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).

  12. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  15. Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 7. Page 3646.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3590.) (May 24).

  20. Set for hearing May 24.

  21. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  22. Set for hearing May 14.

  23. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3309.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Set for hearing April 24.

  25. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  26. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3022.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  27. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  28. Set for hearing March 27.

  29. Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.

  30. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.

  31. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Sasha Renée Pérez · Cosponsor
  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • De León · Primary
  • Mitchell · Cosponsor
  • Correa · Cosponsor
  • Swanson · Cosponsor
  • Vargas · Cosponsor
  • Williams · Cosponsor
  • Yee · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • De León

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (113)

113 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 113 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 28 Yea · 4 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25408
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 28408
% of votes cast 70%10%0%20%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea
Kehoe — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Pavley — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 65 Yea · 6 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 64607
Democratic 1000
Republican 0002
Total 65609
% of votes cast 81%8%0%11%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Fong — Yea
Butler — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Morrell — Not Voting
Norby — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 49 Yea · 20 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4818011
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 4920011
% of votes cast 61%25%0%14%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Butler — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fong — Yea
Huber — Yea
Allen — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Beall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Torres — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Logue — Nay
Conway — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Bonilla — Not Voting
Halderman — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Not Voting
Olsen — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Miller — Nay
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 28 Yea · 7 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25705
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 28705
% of votes cast 70%18%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Evans — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Cannella — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5200
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Lieu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Kehoe — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1064 do?
(1) Under existing law, a child who is removed from the physical custody of his or her parent or parents in dissolution, dependency, or probate guardianship proceedings may be placed with a parent, relative, legal guardian, or other specified persons or in specified placement homes or facilities. When a child is placed with his or her relative during dependency proceedings and the relative is not a licensed or certified foster parent, existing law requires a county social worker to visit the relative's home, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check of the relative through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of the assessment. This bill would permit a court to place a child in any of those proceedings with a parent, legal guardian, or relative regardless of the immigration status of the parent, legal guardian, or relative. This bill would also permit a relative's foreign consulate identification card or foreign passport to be used for initiating the criminal records and fingerprint clearance checks. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law sets forth the procedure for terminating the parental rights of a dependent child, including regular review hearings before a court may order a hearing to terminate parental rights. Under existing law, a court may continue these review hearings if it finds that there is a substantial probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the extended period of time or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or legal guardian. This bill would authorize a court to extend the review hearing periods following consideration of the parent's circumstances if a parent has been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained by the United States Department of Homeland Security, or deported to his or her country of origin, and, under these circumstances would authorize a court to continue the case only if the court finds that there is a substantial probability, as defined, that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent and safely maintained in the home within the extended time period or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or guardian. (3) Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services, which oversees the administration of county public social services, including child welfare services. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to provide guidance on best practices and to facilitate an exchange of information and best practices among counties on an annual basis, beginning no later than January 1, 2014, on establishing memoranda of understanding with foreign consulates in juvenile court cases, including procedures for contacting a consulate, accessing a child's documentation, locating a detained parent, assisting in family reunification after a parent has been deported, aiding the safe transfer of a child to the parent's country of origin, and communicating with relevant departments and services in a parent's country of origin, and procedures to assist children in juvenile court cases who are eligible for special immigrant juvenile status and other specified visas. (4) The bill would change references in the above-described provisions from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the United States Department of Homeland Security, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 3040 of the Family Code proposed by SB 1476 that would become operative only if SB 1476 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2060 that would become operative only if either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 2209 that would become operative only if AB 2209 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (8) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 361.5 and 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and SB 1521 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 366.21, 366.22, and 366.25 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2292 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (10) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 388 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 that would become operative only if AB 1712 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 1064?
SB 1064 is sponsored by Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic), Alejo, De León, Mitchell, Correa, Swanson, Vargas, Williams, and Yee.
What is the current status of SB 1064?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1064?
Track SB 1064 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1064

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1064

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →