Child custody: immigration.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1064 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1064.
You're tracking SB 1064
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1064 — Child custody: immigration.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 845, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 11 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, a child who is removed from the physical custody of his or her parent or parents in dissolution, dependency, or probate guardianship proceedings may be placed with a parent, relative, legal guardian, or other specified persons or in specified placement homes or facilities. When a child is placed with his or her relative during dependency proceedings and the relative is not a licensed or certified foster parent, existing law requires a county social worker to visit the relative's home, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check of the relative through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of the assessment. This bill would permit a court to place a child in any of those proceedings with a parent, legal guardian, or relative regardless of the immigration status of the parent, legal guardian, or relative. This bill would also permit a relative's foreign consulate identification card or foreign passport to be used for initiating the criminal records and fingerprint clearance checks. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law sets forth the procedure for terminating the parental rights of a dependent child, including regular review hearings before a court may order a hearing to terminate parental rights. Under existing law, a court may continue these review hearings if it finds that there is a substantial probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the extended period of time or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or legal guardian. This bill would authorize a court to extend the review hearing periods following consideration of the parent's circumstances if a parent has been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained by the United States Department of Homeland Security, or deported to his or her country of origin, and, under these circumstances would authorize a court to continue the case only if the court finds that there is a substantial probability, as defined, that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent and safely maintained in the home within the extended time period or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or guardian. (3) Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services, which oversees the administration of county public social services, including child welfare services. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to provide guidance on best practices and to facilitate an exchange of information and best practices among counties on an annual basis, beginning no later than January 1, 2014, on establishing memoranda of understanding with foreign consulates in juvenile court cases, including procedures for contacting a consulate, accessing a child's documentation, locating a detained parent, assisting in family reunification after a parent has been deported, aiding the safe transfer of a child to the parent's country of origin, and communicating with relevant departments and services in a parent's country of origin, and procedures to assist children in juvenile court cases who are eligible for special immigrant juvenile status and other specified visas. (4) The bill would change references in the above-described provisions from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the United States Department of Homeland Security, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 3040 of the Family Code proposed by SB 1476 that would become operative only if SB 1476 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2060 that would become operative only if either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 2209 that would become operative only if AB 2209 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (8) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 361.5 and 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and SB 1521 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 366.21, 366.22, and 366.25 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2292 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (10) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 388 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 that would become operative only if AB 1712 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2012
- Enrolled 08/31/12 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2012
- Amended 08/24/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2012
- Amended 04/16/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 16, 2012
- Amended 03/19/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 19, 2012
- Introduced 02/13/12 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2012
- SB1064 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 845, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 4. Page 4969.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 65. Noes 6. Page 6448.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 49. Noes 20. Page 6275.)
-
Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Page 6273.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 7. Page 3646.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3590.) (May 24).
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 14.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3309.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3022.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
Set for hearing March 27.
-
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Sasha Renée Pérez · Cosponsor
- Alejo · Cosponsor
- De León · Primary
- Mitchell · Cosponsor
- Correa · Cosponsor
- Swanson · Cosponsor
- Vargas · Cosponsor
- Williams · Cosponsor
- Yee · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- De León
Co-sponsors (8)
- Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic
- Alejo
- Mitchell
- Correa
- Swanson
- Vargas
- Williams
- Yee
Not signed on (113)
113 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 113 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 10% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 65 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 8% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 18 | 0 | 11 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 20 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 25% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 18% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1064 do?
- (1) Under existing law, a child who is removed from the physical custody of his or her parent or parents in dissolution, dependency, or probate guardianship proceedings may be placed with a parent, relative, legal guardian, or other specified persons or in specified placement homes or facilities. When a child is placed with his or her relative during dependency proceedings and the relative is not a licensed or certified foster parent, existing law requires a county social worker to visit the relative's home, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check of the relative through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of the assessment. This bill would permit a court to place a child in any of those proceedings with a parent, legal guardian, or relative regardless of the immigration status of the parent, legal guardian, or relative. This bill would also permit a relative's foreign consulate identification card or foreign passport to be used for initiating the criminal records and fingerprint clearance checks. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law sets forth the procedure for terminating the parental rights of a dependent child, including regular review hearings before a court may order a hearing to terminate parental rights. Under existing law, a court may continue these review hearings if it finds that there is a substantial probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the extended period of time or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or legal guardian. This bill would authorize a court to extend the review hearing periods following consideration of the parent's circumstances if a parent has been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained by the United States Department of Homeland Security, or deported to his or her country of origin, and, under these circumstances would authorize a court to continue the case only if the court finds that there is a substantial probability, as defined, that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent and safely maintained in the home within the extended time period or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent or guardian. (3) Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services, which oversees the administration of county public social services, including child welfare services. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to provide guidance on best practices and to facilitate an exchange of information and best practices among counties on an annual basis, beginning no later than January 1, 2014, on establishing memoranda of understanding with foreign consulates in juvenile court cases, including procedures for contacting a consulate, accessing a child's documentation, locating a detained parent, assisting in family reunification after a parent has been deported, aiding the safe transfer of a child to the parent's country of origin, and communicating with relevant departments and services in a parent's country of origin, and procedures to assist children in juvenile court cases who are eligible for special immigrant juvenile status and other specified visas. (4) The bill would change references in the above-described provisions from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the United States Department of Homeland Security, and would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 3040 of the Family Code proposed by SB 1476 that would become operative only if SB 1476 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2060 that would become operative only if either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 361.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 2209 that would become operative only if AB 2209 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (8) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 361.5 and 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and SB 1521 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (9) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 366.21, 366.22, and 366.25 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 and AB 2292 that would become operative only if either or both of these bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (10) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 388 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1712 that would become operative only if AB 1712 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 1064?
- SB 1064 is sponsored by Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic), Alejo, De León, Mitchell, Correa, Swanson, Vargas, Williams, and Yee.
- What is the current status of SB 1064?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1064?
- Track SB 1064 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1064
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1064
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →