Vehicles: brokers of construction trucking services: surety bonds.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1092 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1092.
You're tracking SB 1092
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1092 — Vehicles: brokers of construction trucking services: surety bonds.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 490, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to regulate the safe operation of specified vehicles, including commercial motor vehicles and trailer and semitrailer commercial vehicle combinations owned and operated by motor carriers. Existing law also requires every motor carrier of property to comply with specified safety, permit, and liability insurance regulations and to pay the fees required by these provisions. Existing law prohibits a broker of construction trucking services, as defined, from furnishing construction transportation services to a construction project unless it has secured a surety bond of not less than $15,000 executed by an admitted surety insurer. This bill would require a broker of construction trucking services to annually provide written evidence of the broker's valid surety bond to a 3rd-party nonprofit organization that is related to the industry and regularly maintains a published database of bonded brokers or to post a current copy of the surety bond on the broker's Internet Web site. The bill would also prohibit a 3rd-party nonprofit organization from charging a broker for posting evidence of a valid surety bond or from limiting the posting of the bond only to the organization's members. The bill also would prohibit a broker of construction trucking services from hiring, or otherwise engaging the services of, a motor carrier of property to furnish construction transportation services unless the broker provides, prior to the commencement of work each calendar year, written evidence of the broker's valid surety bond to any person that hires, or otherwise engages the services of, the broker to furnish construction transportation services and also to the hired motor carrier of property. Because a violation of these provisions would be a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2012
- Enrolled 08/22/12 - Enrolled pdf August 22, 2012
- Amended 06/13/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 13, 2012
- Amended 04/09/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 09, 2012
- Introduced 02/15/12 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2012
- SB1092 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 490, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4630.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5967.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 11).
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3399.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing April 30.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3123.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Set for hearing April 10.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing March 27.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- De León · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- De León
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1092 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to regulate the safe operation of specified vehicles, including commercial motor vehicles and trailer and semitrailer commercial vehicle combinations owned and operated by motor carriers. Existing law also requires every motor carrier of property to comply with specified safety, permit, and liability insurance regulations and to pay the fees required by these provisions. Existing law prohibits a broker of construction trucking services, as defined, from furnishing construction transportation services to a construction project unless it has secured a surety bond of not less than $15,000 executed by an admitted surety insurer. This bill would require a broker of construction trucking services to annually provide written evidence of the broker's valid surety bond to a 3rd-party nonprofit organization that is related to the industry and regularly maintains a published database of bonded brokers or to post a current copy of the surety bond on the broker's Internet Web site. The bill would also prohibit a 3rd-party nonprofit organization from charging a broker for posting evidence of a valid surety bond or from limiting the posting of the bond only to the organization's members. The bill also would prohibit a broker of construction trucking services from hiring, or otherwise engaging the services of, a motor carrier of property to furnish construction transportation services unless the broker provides, prior to the commencement of work each calendar year, written evidence of the broker's valid surety bond to any person that hires, or otherwise engages the services of, the broker to furnish construction transportation services and also to the hired motor carrier of property. Because a violation of these provisions would be a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1092?
- SB 1092 is sponsored by De León.
- What is the current status of SB 1092?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1092?
- Track SB 1092 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1092
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1092
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →