AB 724 — Clean Energy Jobs and Investment Act.
Last action — Measure version as amended on September 9 corrected.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Under the Public Utilities Act, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. The Public Utilities Act requires the PUC to require, until January 1, 2012, an electrical corporation to identify a separate electrical rate component (public goods charge) to fund energy efficiency, renewable energy, and research, development, and demonstration programs that enhance system reliability and provide in-state benefits. A violation of the Public Utilities Act is a crime. This bill would extend this requirement to January 1, 2020. Because a violation of this requirement is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would, commencing on January 1, 2012, increase the amount of funds the PUC would require an electrical corporation to collect for these purposes. This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. The bill would provide that if the Legislature finds that moneys collected on or after January 1, 2012, are not used for the above-specified purposes, the collection of those moneys would cease at the end of the calendar year in which the Legislature made that finding. (2) Existing law requires that the moneys collected between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2012, from the electrical corporations for public interest research, development, and demonstration projects be deposited in the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund and be used for the purposes of the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration, Program. This bill would enact the Clean Energy Jobs and Investment Act. This bill would expressly provide that the public goods charge for public interest research, development, and demonstration projects collected before January 1, 2012, be deposited into the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund and expended for the purposes of the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Program. The bill would establish the Clean Energy Innovation Program Fund in the State Treasury and would require public goods charge collected on and after January 1, 2012, to be deposited into the Clean Energy Innovation Program Fund and expended by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , upon appropriation, for specified purposes. (3) Existing law requires the Energy Commission to establish programs to optimize public investment and ensure that the most cost-effective and efficient investments in renewable energy resources are vigorously pursued (Renewable Energy Resources Program) . Existing law requires, until January 1, 2012, that moneys from the public goods charge collected for renewable energy be transferred to the Renewable Resource Trust Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for the purpose of implementing the program. This bill would revise and recast the Renewable Energy Resources Program to, among other things, provide investment in energy storage technologies. The bill would extend to January 1, 2020, the transfer of the public goods charge collected for renewable energy to the Renewable Resource Trust Fund. The bill would provide that moneys in the Renewable Resource Trust Fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be expended for the purposes of the program. (4) Decisions of the PUC adopted the California Solar Initiative (CSI) . Existing law requires the PUC to undertake certain steps in implementing the CSI. Existing law requires the PUC to ensure that the total cost of the CSI over the duration of the program does not exceed $3,350,000,000, including $400,000,000 from the Emerging Renewable Resources Account within the Renewable Resource Trust Fund, for programs for the installation of solar energy systems, as defined, on new construction administered by the Energy Commission (New Solar Homes Partnership) . This bill would provide that the $400,000,000 referenced above be subject to supervision by the PUC. The bill would require the Energy Commission to revise its guidelines applicable to the New Solar Homes Partnership so that the program accomplishes specified matter. (5) The bill would not become operative unless SB 870 of the 2011–12 Regular Session of the Legislature is enacted on or before January 1, 2012. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 09/09/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf September 09, 2011
- Amended 09/07/11 - Amended Senate pdf September 07, 2011
- Amended 08/30/11 - Amended Senate pdf August 30, 2011
- Amended 08/18/11 - Amended Senate pdf August 18, 2011
- Amended 05/17/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 17, 2011
- Amended 04/28/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 28, 2011
- Introduced 02/17/11 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2011
- AB724 View text html
Action History
-
Measure version as amended on September 9 corrected.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause refused adoption. (Ayes 19. Noes 17. Page 2487.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
(Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 2481.)
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 2473.)
-
(Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 2473.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
(Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 2392.)
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 2368.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 15. Page 1502.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 11).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bradford · Primary
- Williams · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bradford
Co-sponsors (1)
- Williams
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 16 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 19 | 17 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 48% | 43% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 9% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 60 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 62 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 19% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 18% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 724 do?
- (1) Under the Public Utilities Act, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. The Public Utilities Act requires the PUC to require, until January 1, 2012, an electrical corporation to identify a separate electrical rate component (public goods charge) to fund energy efficiency, renewable energy, and research, development, and demonstration programs that enhance system reliability and provide in-state benefits. A violation of the Public Utilities Act is a crime. This bill would extend this requirement to January 1, 2020. Because a violation of this requirement is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would, commencing on January 1, 2012, increase the amount of funds the PUC would require an electrical corporation to collect for these purposes. This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. The bill would provide that if the Legislature finds that moneys collected on or after January 1, 2012, are not used for the above-specified purposes, the collection of those moneys would cease at the end of the calendar year in which the Legislature made that finding. (2) Existing law requires that the moneys collected between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2012, from the electrical corporations for public interest research, development, and demonstration projects be deposited in the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund and be used for the purposes of the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration, Program. This bill would enact the Clean Energy Jobs and Investment Act. This bill would expressly provide that the public goods charge for public interest research, development, and demonstration projects collected before January 1, 2012, be deposited into the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Fund and expended for the purposes of the Public Interest Research, Development, and Demonstration Program. The bill would establish the Clean Energy Innovation Program Fund in the State Treasury and would require public goods charge collected on and after January 1, 2012, to be deposited into the Clean Energy Innovation Program Fund and expended by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , upon appropriation, for specified purposes. (3) Existing law requires the Energy Commission to establish programs to optimize public investment and ensure that the most cost-effective and efficient investments in renewable energy resources are vigorously pursued (Renewable Energy Resources Program) . Existing law requires, until January 1, 2012, that moneys from the public goods charge collected for renewable energy be transferred to the Renewable Resource Trust Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for the purpose of implementing the program. This bill would revise and recast the Renewable Energy Resources Program to, among other things, provide investment in energy storage technologies. The bill would extend to January 1, 2020, the transfer of the public goods charge collected for renewable energy to the Renewable Resource Trust Fund. The bill would provide that moneys in the Renewable Resource Trust Fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be expended for the purposes of the program. (4) Decisions of the PUC adopted the California Solar Initiative (CSI) . Existing law requires the PUC to undertake certain steps in implementing the CSI. Existing law requires the PUC to ensure that the total cost of the CSI over the duration of the program does not exceed $3,350,000,000, including $400,000,000 from the Emerging Renewable Resources Account within the Renewable Resource Trust Fund, for programs for the installation of solar energy systems, as defined, on new construction administered by the Energy Commission (New Solar Homes Partnership) . This bill would provide that the $400,000,000 referenced above be subject to supervision by the PUC. The bill would require the Energy Commission to revise its guidelines applicable to the New Solar Homes Partnership so that the program accomplishes specified matter. (5) The bill would not become operative unless SB 870 of the 2011–12 Regular Session of the Legislature is enacted on or before January 1, 2012. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (7) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 724?
- AB 724 is sponsored by Bradford and Williams.
- What is the current status of AB 724?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 724?
- Track AB 724 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 724
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 724
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →