Energy: rates: net energy metering.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1537 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1537.
You're tracking SB 1537
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1537 — Energy: rates: net energy metering.
Last action — In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing board. Existing law, relative to private energy producers, requires every electric utility, as defined, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering, as defined, and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer generators, as defined, upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility, as defined. An electric utility, upon request, is required to make the contract or tariff for net energy metering available to eligible customer-generators on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer-generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. With one exception, existing law requires that each net energy metering contract or tariff be identical with respect to rate structure, all retail rate components, and any monthly charges, to the contract or tariff to which the same customer would be assigned if the customer did not use a renewable electrical generation facility, except that eligible customer-generators shall not be assessed standby charges on the electrical generating capacity or the kilowatthour production of a renewable electrical generation facility. This bill would prohibit the commission from adopting any new demand charge, standby charge, customer charge, minimum monthly charge, interconnection charge, or other fixed charge that applies only to customers receiving electric service pursuant to a net energy metering contract or tariff.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/22/12 - Enrolled Current pdf August 22, 2012
- Amended 05/01/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 01, 2012
- Amended 04/09/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 09, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- SB1537 View text html
Action History
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 52. Noes 23. Page 6022.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (August 8).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 6. Page 3650.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3598.) (May 24).
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 14.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 3304.) (April 24).
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 27.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Kehoe · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Kehoe
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 21 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 52 | 23 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 29% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 29% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 13% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 15% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 8% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1537 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing board. Existing law, relative to private energy producers, requires every electric utility, as defined, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering, as defined, and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer generators, as defined, upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility, as defined. An electric utility, upon request, is required to make the contract or tariff for net energy metering available to eligible customer-generators on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer-generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. With one exception, existing law requires that each net energy metering contract or tariff be identical with respect to rate structure, all retail rate components, and any monthly charges, to the contract or tariff to which the same customer would be assigned if the customer did not use a renewable electrical generation facility, except that eligible customer-generators shall not be assessed standby charges on the electrical generating capacity or the kilowatthour production of a renewable electrical generation facility. This bill would prohibit the commission from adopting any new demand charge, standby charge, customer charge, minimum monthly charge, interconnection charge, or other fixed charge that applies only to customers receiving electric service pursuant to a net energy metering contract or tariff.
- Who sponsors SB 1537?
- SB 1537 is sponsored by Kehoe.
- What is the current status of SB 1537?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1537?
- Track SB 1537 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1537
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1537
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →