California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2179 — Fish and game: enforcement and penalties.

Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Kehoe.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the Fish and Game Commission, or any person appointed by the commission, to conduct a hearing, to cause the deposition of witnesses, as prescribed, and to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents and papers, in accordance with certain requirements. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, eliminate the prohibition that the commission not revoke or suspend any license or permit until specified regulations have been adopted and approved, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, also eliminate the provision that any deliberation conducted by the commission, or conducted by any person appointed by the commission to conduct a hearing, is required to be conducted pursuant to the law governing administrative adjudication. Existing law requires the commission to adopt guidelines, by regulation, to assist the director and the department in ascertaining the amount of specified civil penalties, as prescribed. This bill would make these provisions inoperative until January 1, 2018. Existing law permits the Department of Fish and Game to impose civil liability upon any person for specified acts, with prescribed exceptions, done for profit or personal gain, for unlawfully exporting, importing, possessing, receiving, or transporting in interstate commerce any container or package containing any bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish, or any endangered or threatened species, or any fully protected bird, mammal, or fish unless the container is marked as prescribed, and for any unlawful failure or refusal to maintain any records or paperwork as required. Under existing law, the department may assess a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish, or for each endangered or threatened species, or each fully protected bird, mammal, or fish unlawfully taken, possessed, transported, imported, received, purchased, acquired, or sold, in addition to any other applicable penalty. Existing law also requires the department to consult with the district attorney in the jurisdiction where a violation is alleged to have occurred and, before proceeding with a civil action, to seek the concurrence of the Attorney General, as described. Existing law permits the Director of Fish and Game to issue a complaint to any person on whom a civil penalty may be imposed, in accordance with specified provisions, and requires a referee or hearing board, as provided for, to conduct any required hearing. This bill would make these provisions inoperative until January 1, 2018. This bill would instead permit the department to impose administrative civil penalties, determined as prescribed, upon any person who has violated any provision of the Fish and Game Code or regulations adopted pursuant to the code that are subject to prescribed civil penalties. This bill would require the department to adopt regulations to provide guidance in assessing these civil penalties. This bill would require, prior to the imposition of administrative penalties, a person to be given a written notice of the proposed action. This bill would require a person who receives notice of a proposed penalty to have the right to request a hearing before the department in accordance with specified procedures. This bill would permit the department to take the action proposed without a hearing if a hearing is not requested. This bill would permit a person to appeal to the director if administrative penalties are imposed upon that person, as prescribed. This bill would permit a person served with a copy of an order setting the amount of a civil penalty to file with the superior court a petition for a writ of mandate for review of the order, as specified. This bill would permit the department to file a certified copy of the final decision that directs payment of an administrative penalty and, if applicable, any order that denies a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus with the clerk of the superior court of any county, would require the clerk to enter judgment, and would prohibit the clerk from charging fees for the performance of any official service required in connection with this entry of judgment. This bill would require any administrative penalties received pursuant to these provisions to be deposited into the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. This bill would repeal these provisions as of January 1, 2018. Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires any public record of a state or local agency to be open to inspection at all times during office hours of the agency and, upon request, a copy be made promptly available to any person upon payment of copying costs. The act makes certain records exempt from disclosure. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, and after all appeals are final, provide that records of the appeal to the director are public records, as defined by the act.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Kehoe.

  2. Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 5035.)

  3. Motion to reconsider made by Senator Kehoe.

  4. Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 11. Noes 23. Page 5035.).

  5. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  6. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.

  7. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  9. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 26).

  11. Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 41. Noes 28. Page 5143.)

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  16. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 16).

  17. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Read second time and amended.

  19. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 24).

  20. Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W., P. & W. Read second time and amended.

  22. Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  23. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  24. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 11 Yea · 23 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 112105
Republican 0100
Democratic 0101
Total 112306
% of votes cast 28%58%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Negrete McLeod — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Rubio — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Nay
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Not Voting
Vargas — Nay
Wright — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Hernandez — Nay
Huff — Nay
Liu — Not Voting
Walters — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 41 Yea · 28 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4026011
Democratic 1000
Republican 0200
Total 4128011
% of votes cast 51%35%0%14%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Fong — Yea
Hill — Yea
Allen — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Torres — Yea
Campos — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gordon — Not Voting
Gorell — Nay
Chesbro — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Conway — Nay
Fletcher — Not Voting
Cook — Nay
Bonilla — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Alejo — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Norby — Nay
Perea — Not Voting
Smyth — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9300
Republican 0100
Total 9400
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yamada — Yea
Fong — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Campos — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Lara — Yea
Williams — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2179 do?
Existing law authorizes the Fish and Game Commission, or any person appointed by the commission, to conduct a hearing, to cause the deposition of witnesses, as prescribed, and to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents and papers, in accordance with certain requirements. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, eliminate the prohibition that the commission not revoke or suspend any license or permit until specified regulations have been adopted and approved, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, also eliminate the provision that any deliberation conducted by the commission, or conducted by any person appointed by the commission to conduct a hearing, is required to be conducted pursuant to the law governing administrative adjudication. Existing law requires the commission to adopt guidelines, by regulation, to assist the director and the department in ascertaining the amount of specified civil penalties, as prescribed. This bill would make these provisions inoperative until January 1, 2018. Existing law permits the Department of Fish and Game to impose civil liability upon any person for specified acts, with prescribed exceptions, done for profit or personal gain, for unlawfully exporting, importing, possessing, receiving, or transporting in interstate commerce any container or package containing any bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish, or any endangered or threatened species, or any fully protected bird, mammal, or fish unless the container is marked as prescribed, and for any unlawful failure or refusal to maintain any records or paperwork as required. Under existing law, the department may assess a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish, or for each endangered or threatened species, or each fully protected bird, mammal, or fish unlawfully taken, possessed, transported, imported, received, purchased, acquired, or sold, in addition to any other applicable penalty. Existing law also requires the department to consult with the district attorney in the jurisdiction where a violation is alleged to have occurred and, before proceeding with a civil action, to seek the concurrence of the Attorney General, as described. Existing law permits the Director of Fish and Game to issue a complaint to any person on whom a civil penalty may be imposed, in accordance with specified provisions, and requires a referee or hearing board, as provided for, to conduct any required hearing. This bill would make these provisions inoperative until January 1, 2018. This bill would instead permit the department to impose administrative civil penalties, determined as prescribed, upon any person who has violated any provision of the Fish and Game Code or regulations adopted pursuant to the code that are subject to prescribed civil penalties. This bill would require the department to adopt regulations to provide guidance in assessing these civil penalties. This bill would require, prior to the imposition of administrative penalties, a person to be given a written notice of the proposed action. This bill would require a person who receives notice of a proposed penalty to have the right to request a hearing before the department in accordance with specified procedures. This bill would permit the department to take the action proposed without a hearing if a hearing is not requested. This bill would permit a person to appeal to the director if administrative penalties are imposed upon that person, as prescribed. This bill would permit a person served with a copy of an order setting the amount of a civil penalty to file with the superior court a petition for a writ of mandate for review of the order, as specified. This bill would permit the department to file a certified copy of the final decision that directs payment of an administrative penalty and, if applicable, any order that denies a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus with the clerk of the superior court of any county, would require the clerk to enter judgment, and would prohibit the clerk from charging fees for the performance of any official service required in connection with this entry of judgment. This bill would require any administrative penalties received pursuant to these provisions to be deposited into the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. This bill would repeal these provisions as of January 1, 2018. Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires any public record of a state or local agency to be open to inspection at all times during office hours of the agency and, upon request, a copy be made promptly available to any person upon payment of copying costs. The act makes certain records exempt from disclosure. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, and after all appeals are final, provide that records of the appeal to the director are public records, as defined by the act.
Who sponsors AB 2179?
AB 2179 is sponsored by Travis Allen.
What is the current status of AB 2179?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2179?
Track AB 2179 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2179

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2179

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →