Medical Marijuana Program: zoning restrictions: residential use.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 847 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 847.
You're tracking SB 847
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 847 — Medical Marijuana Program: zoning restrictions: residential use.
Last action — Veto sustained.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, an initiative measure, prohibits prosecution, pursuant to provisions of law relating to the possession or cultivation of marijuana, of a patient or a patient's primary caregiver who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician. Existing law, the Medical Marijuana Program, requires the State Department of Public Health to establish a voluntary program for the issuance of identification cards to patients and primary caregivers under the Compassionate Use Act, and grants immunity from arrest for violation of proscribed provisions relating to the cultivation, possession, transportation, and sale of marijuana, if conditions of the act are met. The Medical Marijuana Program prohibits a medical marijuana cooperative, collective, dispensary, operator, establishment, or provider from being located within a 600-foot radius of a school. This bill would, also, prohibit a marijuana cooperative, collective, dispensary, operator, establishment, or provider from being located within a 600-foot radius of a residential zone or residential use unless a local ordinance, which may be more or less restrictive than the standard, is passed by the city council or county board of supervisors specifically regulating the location of these establishments in relation to residential zones or residential use. The bill would define "city" for these purposes to mean a general law city, a charter city, and a city and county. The bill would declare establishment of proximity standards to be of statewide concern and not a municipal affair. By changing the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/01/11 - Enrolled Current pdf September 01, 2011
- Amended 08/23/11 - Amended Assembly pdf August 23, 2011
- Amended 05/10/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 10, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- SB847 View text html
Action History
-
Veto sustained.
-
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 4. Page 2152.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 68. Noes 5. Page 2591.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 17).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 2. Page 1244.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
(Corrected May 18.)
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 886.) (May 5).
-
Set for hearing May 5.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 763.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and HEALTH.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Correa · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Correa
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 10% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 68 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 6% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 5% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 5% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 847 do?
- Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, an initiative measure, prohibits prosecution, pursuant to provisions of law relating to the possession or cultivation of marijuana, of a patient or a patient's primary caregiver who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician. Existing law, the Medical Marijuana Program, requires the State Department of Public Health to establish a voluntary program for the issuance of identification cards to patients and primary caregivers under the Compassionate Use Act, and grants immunity from arrest for violation of proscribed provisions relating to the cultivation, possession, transportation, and sale of marijuana, if conditions of the act are met. The Medical Marijuana Program prohibits a medical marijuana cooperative, collective, dispensary, operator, establishment, or provider from being located within a 600-foot radius of a school. This bill would, also, prohibit a marijuana cooperative, collective, dispensary, operator, establishment, or provider from being located within a 600-foot radius of a residential zone or residential use unless a local ordinance, which may be more or less restrictive than the standard, is passed by the city council or county board of supervisors specifically regulating the location of these establishments in relation to residential zones or residential use. The bill would define "city" for these purposes to mean a general law city, a charter city, and a city and county. The bill would declare establishment of proximity standards to be of statewide concern and not a municipal affair. By changing the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 847?
- SB 847 is sponsored by Correa.
- What is the current status of SB 847?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 847?
- Track SB 847 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 847
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 847
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →