County employees' retirement: board of investment: powers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 637 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 637.
You're tracking SB 637
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 637 — County employees' retirement: board of investment: powers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 48, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The County Employees Retirement Act of 1937 prescribes the rights, benefits, and duties of members of the retirement systems established pursuant to its provisions. The act vests the management of these systems in a retirement board except in certain instances in which certain functions may be delegated to a board of investment. The act permits the retirement system of a county that exceeds a specified threshold of assets to form a board of investment which is responsible for all investments of the system. Existing law, applicable to Los Angeles County, authorizes a board of retirement to exercise the power to issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, and to compensate persons subpoenaed, as specified, for matters within the board's jurisdiction. This bill would extend the power to issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, and to compensate persons subpoenaed, described above, to the Board of Investment of the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/01/11 - Chaptered Current pdf July 01, 2011
- Enrolled 06/17/11 - Enrolled pdf June 17, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- SB637 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 48, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1959.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 8).
-
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 711.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 621.) (April 11).
-
Set for hearing April 11.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Public Employment and Retirement · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Public Employment and Retirement
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 637 do?
- The County Employees Retirement Act of 1937 prescribes the rights, benefits, and duties of members of the retirement systems established pursuant to its provisions. The act vests the management of these systems in a retirement board except in certain instances in which certain functions may be delegated to a board of investment. The act permits the retirement system of a county that exceeds a specified threshold of assets to form a board of investment which is responsible for all investments of the system. Existing law, applicable to Los Angeles County, authorizes a board of retirement to exercise the power to issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, and to compensate persons subpoenaed, as specified, for matters within the board's jurisdiction. This bill would extend the power to issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, and to compensate persons subpoenaed, described above, to the Board of Investment of the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association.
- Who sponsors SB 637?
- SB 637 is sponsored by Committee on Public Employment and Retirement.
- What is the current status of SB 637?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 637?
- Track SB 637 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 637
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 637
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →