Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: bicycle transportation plan.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1380 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1380.
You're tracking SB 1380
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1380 — Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: bicycle transportation plan.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Allen.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the lead agencies to make specified findings in an EIR. Existing law establishes the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in the Governor's office. Existing law requires OPR to assist with, among other things, the orderly preparation of programs of transportation. Existing law authorizes a local agency that determines that a project is not subject to CEQA pursuant to certain exemptions and approves or determines to carry out that project, to file notice of the determination with the county clerk in the county in which the project is located. This bill, until January 1, 2018, would exempt from CEQA a bicycle transportation plan for an urbanized area, as specified, and would also require a local agency that determines that the bicycle transportation plan is exempt under this provision and approves or determines to carry out that project, to file notice of the determination with OPR and the county clerk. This bill would require OPR to post specified information on its Internet Web site, as prescribed.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/21/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 21, 2012
- Amended 08/07/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 07, 2012
- Amended 05/03/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 03, 2012
- Amended 04/10/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 10, 2012
- Amended 03/27/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 27, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- SB1380 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Allen.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (August 16).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (July 2).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on TRANS. and NAT. RES.
-
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and TRANS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 3652.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3341.) (April 30).
-
Set for hearing April 30.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 23.
-
(Corrected March 29.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Susan Rubio · Primary
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Perea · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Rubio, Susan Democratic
Co-sponsors (2)
- Chesbro
- Perea
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 6% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 5% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1380 do?
- The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the lead agencies to make specified findings in an EIR. Existing law establishes the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in the Governor's office. Existing law requires OPR to assist with, among other things, the orderly preparation of programs of transportation. Existing law authorizes a local agency that determines that a project is not subject to CEQA pursuant to certain exemptions and approves or determines to carry out that project, to file notice of the determination with the county clerk in the county in which the project is located. This bill, until January 1, 2018, would exempt from CEQA a bicycle transportation plan for an urbanized area, as specified, and would also require a local agency that determines that the bicycle transportation plan is exempt under this provision and approves or determines to carry out that project, to file notice of the determination with OPR and the county clerk. This bill would require OPR to post specified information on its Internet Web site, as prescribed.
- Who sponsors SB 1380?
- SB 1380 is sponsored by Rubio, Susan (Democratic), Chesbro, and Perea.
- What is the current status of SB 1380?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1380?
- Track SB 1380 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1380
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1380
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →