Dental hygienists.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1202 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1202.
You're tracking SB 1202
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1202 — Dental hygienists.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 331, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Dental Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of registered dental hygienists, registered dental hygienists in alternative practice, and registered dental hygienists in extended functions by the Dental Hygiene Committee of California (committee) within the Dental Board of California. Existing law authorizes the committee to appoint an executive officer to perform duties delegated by the committee. (1) The committee performs various functions, including, but not limited to, the evaluation of all registered dental hygienists, registered dental hygienists in alternative practice, and registered dental hygienists in extended functions educational programs that apply for approval. Under existing law, any dental hygiene program accredited by and in good standing with the Commission on Dental Accreditation (commission) is required to be approved by the committee. Existing law authorizes the committee to withdraw or revoke a dental hygiene educational program approval if the program has been placed on probation by the commission. This bill would eliminate the good standing requirement and would instead authorize any dental hygiene program accredited by the commission to be approved by the committee. The bill would authorize the committee to withdraw or revoke program approval if the commission intends to withdraw or has withdrawn approval. (2) Under existing law, the committee is required to grant a registered dental hygienist license to any person meeting certain requirements, including the completion of a specified educational program, satisfactory performance on various related examinations, and the submission of a completed application and the payment of required fees. This bill would additionally require an applicant for licensure as a registered dental hygienist to satisfactorily complete committee-approved instruction in gingival soft tissue curettage, nitrous oxide-oxygen analgesia, and local anesthesia. The bill would authorize the committee to issue a special permit to a registered dental hygienist licensed in another state authorizing him or her to teach in a dental hygiene college without being licensed by this state if certain requirements are met, including, but not limited to, the completion of educational requirements and the payment of an application fee, subject to a biennial renewal fee. (3) Existing law authorizes the committee to grant a license as a registered dental hygienist to an applicant who has not taken the specified clinical examination, if the applicant submits certain information to the committee, including, but not limited to, proof that the applicant has been in clinical practice as a registered dental hygienist or has been a full-time faculty member in a specified program for at least 5 years preceding the date of the application and proof that the applicant has not been subject to disciplinary action by another state where he or she is or was previously licensed as a registered dental hygienist or dental hygienist. This bill would require that proof of prior experience to have been obtained at least 5 years immediately preceding the applicant's date of application and would expand that proof relating to disciplinary action to include any other state where the applicant was previously issued any professional or vocational license. (4) Except as specified, existing law prohibits an agency in the department, including the committee, on the basis of an applicant's failure to successfully complete prior examinations, from imposing any additional limitations or requirements on any applicant who wishes to participate in subsequent examinations. This bill would prohibit an examinee for a registered dental hygiene license who either fails to pass the clinical examination after 3 attempts or fails to pass the clinical examination because he or she imposed gross trauma on a patient from being eligible for further reexamination until the examinee completes specified remedial education. (5) Existing law requires the committee to grant a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice license to any person meeting certain requirements, including satisfactory performance on a specified examination, the submission of an application, and the payment of application fees. Under existing law, a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice may perform specified functions and procedures in residences of the homebound, schools, residential facilities, and dental health professional shortage areas. This bill would require a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice to register his or her place or places of practice, within a specified timeframe, with the executive officer. The bill would require a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice to receive permission from the committee, subject to a biennial renewal fee, to have an additional place of practice. The bill would authorize a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice to operate a mobile dental hygiene clinic under certain circumstances if various requirements are met, including the payment of a fee not to exceed $250, pursuant to regulations adopted by the committee. (6) Under existing law, if a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice provides dental hygiene services to a patient 18 months or more after the first date that he or she provided services to the patient, he or she is required to obtain written verification, including a written prescription for dental hygiene services, issued by a dentist or physician and surgeon licensed to practice in this state. Existing law provides that a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice who provides those services in violation of these provisions has engaged in unprofessional conduct and that requires the committee to seek an injunction against him or her. Existing law provides circumstances under which the committee may revoke or suspend a license to practice dental hygiene. This bill would instead authorize the committee to seek an injunction under those circumstances and specify that a violation by a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice of the requirement to obtain a prescription, as specified above, before providing those services is reason for the committee to revoke or suspend his or her license. (7) Under existing law, the committee is required to establish by resolution the amount of the fees, subject to respective maximum fee amounts established by existing law, that relate to the licensing of a registered dental hygienist, a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice, and a registered dental hygienist in extended functions subject to certain limitations. This bill would increase the respective maximum fee amounts within which the committee shall establish fee amounts for an original license and the biennial renewal fee for such a license, and would also increase the maximum fee amount for curriculum review and site evaluation for specified educational programs, as specified. The bill would define the term "extramural dental facility" and also establish a fee for certification of licensure and registration of an extramural dental facility. (8) Existing law declares it is the intent of the Legislature that the committee grant or renew approval of only those educational programs for, among others, a registered dental hygienist that continuously maintain a high quality standard of instruction. This bill would instead require the committee to grant or renew approval of only those educational programs that meet the standard described above and, where appropriate, meet the minimum standards set by the commission or an equivalent body, as determined by the committee. The bill would require a new educational program for registered dental hygienists, as defined, to also submit a feasibility study demonstrating a need for a new educational program and would require a new educational program to apply to the committee for specified approval prior to seeking initial accreditation from the commission or an equivalent body, as determined by the committee. (9) This bill would make various technical, nonsubstantive, and conforming changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/14/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 14, 2012
- Enrolled 08/30/12 - Enrolled pdf August 30, 2012
- Amended 08/20/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 20, 2012
- Amended 05/29/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 29, 2012
- Amended 05/08/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 08, 2012
- Amended 04/12/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 12, 2012
- Amended 03/29/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 29, 2012
- Introduced 02/22/12 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2012
- SB1202 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 331, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:15 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4850.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6203.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 3708.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3592.) (May 24).
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 14.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3086.) (April 9).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Set for hearing April 9.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Leno · Primary
- Wyland · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Leno
Co-sponsors (1)
- Wyland
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1202 do?
- Existing law, the Dental Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of registered dental hygienists, registered dental hygienists in alternative practice, and registered dental hygienists in extended functions by the Dental Hygiene Committee of California (committee) within the Dental Board of California. Existing law authorizes the committee to appoint an executive officer to perform duties delegated by the committee. (1) The committee performs various functions, including, but not limited to, the evaluation of all registered dental hygienists, registered dental hygienists in alternative practice, and registered dental hygienists in extended functions educational programs that apply for approval. Under existing law, any dental hygiene program accredited by and in good standing with the Commission on Dental Accreditation (commission) is required to be approved by the committee. Existing law authorizes the committee to withdraw or revoke a dental hygiene educational program approval if the program has been placed on probation by the commission. This bill would eliminate the good standing requirement and would instead authorize any dental hygiene program accredited by the commission to be approved by the committee. The bill would authorize the committee to withdraw or revoke program approval if the commission intends to withdraw or has withdrawn approval. (2) Under existing law, the committee is required to grant a registered dental hygienist license to any person meeting certain requirements, including the completion of a specified educational program, satisfactory performance on various related examinations, and the submission of a completed application and the payment of required fees. This bill would additionally require an applicant for licensure as a registered dental hygienist to satisfactorily complete committee-approved instruction in gingival soft tissue curettage, nitrous oxide-oxygen analgesia, and local anesthesia. The bill would authorize the committee to issue a special permit to a registered dental hygienist licensed in another state authorizing him or her to teach in a dental hygiene college without being licensed by this state if certain requirements are met, including, but not limited to, the completion of educational requirements and the payment of an application fee, subject to a biennial renewal fee. (3) Existing law authorizes the committee to grant a license as a registered dental hygienist to an applicant who has not taken the specified clinical examination, if the applicant submits certain information to the committee, including, but not limited to, proof that the applicant has been in clinical practice as a registered dental hygienist or has been a full-time faculty member in a specified program for at least 5 years preceding the date of the application and proof that the applicant has not been subject to disciplinary action by another state where he or she is or was previously licensed as a registered dental hygienist or dental hygienist. This bill would require that proof of prior experience to have been obtained at least 5 years immediately preceding the applicant's date of application and would expand that proof relating to disciplinary action to include any other state where the applicant was previously issued any professional or vocational license. (4) Except as specified, existing law prohibits an agency in the department, including the committee, on the basis of an applicant's failure to successfully complete prior examinations, from imposing any additional limitations or requirements on any applicant who wishes to participate in subsequent examinations. This bill would prohibit an examinee for a registered dental hygiene license who either fails to pass the clinical examination after 3 attempts or fails to pass the clinical examination because he or she imposed gross trauma on a patient from being eligible for further reexamination until the examinee completes specified remedial education. (5) Existing law requires the committee to grant a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice license to any person meeting certain requirements, including satisfactory performance on a specified examination, the submission of an application, and the payment of application fees. Under existing law, a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice may perform specified functions and procedures in residences of the homebound, schools, residential facilities, and dental health professional shortage areas. This bill would require a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice to register his or her place or places of practice, within a specified timeframe, with the executive officer. The bill would require a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice to receive permission from the committee, subject to a biennial renewal fee, to have an additional place of practice. The bill would authorize a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice to operate a mobile dental hygiene clinic under certain circumstances if various requirements are met, including the payment of a fee not to exceed $250, pursuant to regulations adopted by the committee. (6) Under existing law, if a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice provides dental hygiene services to a patient 18 months or more after the first date that he or she provided services to the patient, he or she is required to obtain written verification, including a written prescription for dental hygiene services, issued by a dentist or physician and surgeon licensed to practice in this state. Existing law provides that a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice who provides those services in violation of these provisions has engaged in unprofessional conduct and that requires the committee to seek an injunction against him or her. Existing law provides circumstances under which the committee may revoke or suspend a license to practice dental hygiene. This bill would instead authorize the committee to seek an injunction under those circumstances and specify that a violation by a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice of the requirement to obtain a prescription, as specified above, before providing those services is reason for the committee to revoke or suspend his or her license. (7) Under existing law, the committee is required to establish by resolution the amount of the fees, subject to respective maximum fee amounts established by existing law, that relate to the licensing of a registered dental hygienist, a registered dental hygienist in alternative practice, and a registered dental hygienist in extended functions subject to certain limitations. This bill would increase the respective maximum fee amounts within which the committee shall establish fee amounts for an original license and the biennial renewal fee for such a license, and would also increase the maximum fee amount for curriculum review and site evaluation for specified educational programs, as specified. The bill would define the term "extramural dental facility" and also establish a fee for certification of licensure and registration of an extramural dental facility. (8) Existing law declares it is the intent of the Legislature that the committee grant or renew approval of only those educational programs for, among others, a registered dental hygienist that continuously maintain a high quality standard of instruction. This bill would instead require the committee to grant or renew approval of only those educational programs that meet the standard described above and, where appropriate, meet the minimum standards set by the commission or an equivalent body, as determined by the committee. The bill would require a new educational program for registered dental hygienists, as defined, to also submit a feasibility study demonstrating a need for a new educational program and would require a new educational program to apply to the committee for specified approval prior to seeking initial accreditation from the commission or an equivalent body, as determined by the committee. (9) This bill would make various technical, nonsubstantive, and conforming changes.
- Who sponsors SB 1202?
- SB 1202 is sponsored by Leno and Wyland.
- What is the current status of SB 1202?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1202?
- Track SB 1202 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1202
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1202
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →