Natural resources: Cache Creek Resource Management Plan.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 133 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 133.
You're tracking SB 133
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 133 — Natural resources: Cache Creek Resource Management Plan.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 145, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975, governs surface mining operations and reclamation of mined lands, and provides, among other things, for the submission of reclamation plans to, and issuance of permits by, lead agencies to persons engaging in surface mining operations. Until December 31, 2012, a site specific plan in conjunction and consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be considered a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for purposes of the act. The board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented is required, until December 31, 2012, to prepare and forward to the Director of Conservation annually a report containing specified information relating to mining operations. Existing law provides that these provisions shall not become operative until the date the State Mining and Geology Board notifies the Secretary of State that the board has approved an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors for the County of Yolo that governs in-channel noncommercial extraction activities carried out pursuant to the plan. This bill would delete the requirement regarding the operative date. The bill would extend these provisions until December 31, 2017. By extending the duties of the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the annual report on the Cache Creek Area Plan that is prepared by the County of Yolo staff and submitted to the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is implemented to also be submitted to the Assembly Natural Resources Committee and the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/01/11 - Chaptered Current pdf August 01, 2011
- Enrolled 07/15/11 - Enrolled pdf July 15, 2011
- Amended 04/05/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 05, 2011
- Introduced 01/27/11 - Introduced pdf January 27, 2011
- SB133 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 145, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2342.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 6).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 904.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 619.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Set for hearing April 12.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wolk · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wolk
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 73 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 133 do?
- (1) The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975, governs surface mining operations and reclamation of mined lands, and provides, among other things, for the submission of reclamation plans to, and issuance of permits by, lead agencies to persons engaging in surface mining operations. Until December 31, 2012, a site specific plan in conjunction and consistent with the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be considered a functional equivalent of a reclamation plan for purposes of the act. The board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented is required, until December 31, 2012, to prepare and forward to the Director of Conservation annually a report containing specified information relating to mining operations. Existing law provides that these provisions shall not become operative until the date the State Mining and Geology Board notifies the Secretary of State that the board has approved an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors for the County of Yolo that governs in-channel noncommercial extraction activities carried out pursuant to the plan. This bill would delete the requirement regarding the operative date. The bill would extend these provisions until December 31, 2017. By extending the duties of the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is to be implemented, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the annual report on the Cache Creek Area Plan that is prepared by the County of Yolo staff and submitted to the board of supervisors of the county in which the Cache Creek Resource Management Plan is implemented to also be submitted to the Assembly Natural Resources Committee and the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 133?
- SB 133 is sponsored by Wolk.
- What is the current status of SB 133?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 133?
- Track SB 133 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 133
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 133
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →