Energy: renewable energy resources.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 23 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 23.
You're tracking SB 23
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 23 — Energy: renewable energy resources.
Last action — In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law creates the California renewables portfolio standard program (RPS program) and the Renewable Energy Resources Program to increase the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources, as defined. Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session, the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , by June 30, 2011, is required to study and provide a report to the Legislature that analyzes run-of-river hydroelectric generating facilities, as defined, in British Columbia, including whether these facilities are, or should be, included as renewable electrical generation facilities for purposes of the Renewable Energy Resources Program administered by the Energy Commission or eligible renewable energy resources for purposes of the RPS program. Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session, the Energy Commission, among other things, is required to adopt regulations specifying procedures for enforcement of the RPS requirements by July 1, 2011. Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) , by July 1, 2011, is required to determine the effective load carrying capacity of wind and solar energy resources on the electrical grid. This bill would extend the compliance date for these corresponding reporting and regulatory requirements, as provided. (2) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session,the PUC, in consultation with the Energy Commission, is required to report to the Legislature by January 1 of every even-numbered year on (A) the progress and status of procurement activities by each retail seller, (B) the status of permitting and siting eligible renewable energy resources and transmission facilities necessary to supply electricity generated to load, (C) the projected ability of electrical corporations to meet the RPS program procurement requirements under a cost limitation established by the PUC and any recommendations for revisions to those cost limitations, and (D) barriers to, and policy recommendations for, achieving the renewables portfolio standard established pursuant to the RPS program. This bill would delete the requirement that the PUC report on the projected ability of electrical corporations to meet the RPS program procurement requirements under a cost limitation established by the PUC and any recommendations for revisions to those cost limitations, and would require that the first report be made on January 1, 2014. (3) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the First Extraordinary Session of the 2011–12 Session,the PUC is required to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, to be procured by each retail seller, as defined, for specified compliance periods, sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 20% of retail sales for the period January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, 25% of retail sales by December 31, 2016, and 33% of retail sales by December 31, 2020, and in all subsequent years. The PUC is required to establish the quantity of electricity products to be procured by the retail seller for each compliance period by January 1, 2012. The RPS program, consistent with the goals of procuring the least-cost and best-fit eligible renewable energy resources that meet project viability principles, requires that all retail sellers procure a balanced portfolio of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, as specified. The RPS program requires the PUC to direct each electrical corporation to annually prepare a renewable energy procurement plan containing specified matter and an annual compliance report. This bill would require the PUC to establish the quantity of electricity products to be procured by the retail seller for each compliance period by June 1, 2012, and require that the compliance report be submitted at least annually. (4) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the First Extraordinary Session of the 2011–12 Session,an eligible renewable energy resource is defined for the purposes of the RPS program to include a small hydroelectric generation unit with a nameplate capacity not exceeding 40 megawatts that is operated as part of a water supply or conveyance system, if the retail seller or local publicly owned electric utility procured the electricity from the facility as of December 31, 2005. This bill would instead make a small hydroelectric generation unit with a nameplate capacity not exceeding 40 megawatts an eligible renewable energy resource if a retail seller or local publicly owned electric utility operates the facility to supply or convey water to its customers and procured the electricity from the facility as of December 31, 2005. (5) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the First Extraordinary Session of the 2011–12 Session,the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility, as defined, is required to adopt a program for the enforcement of the RPS program on or before January 1, 2012. This bill would extend this deadline until January 1, 2013. (6) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (the act) , establishes the State Air Resources Board (state board) as the state agency responsible for monitoring and regulating sources emitting greenhouse gases. The act requires the state board to adopt regulations to require the reporting and verification of statewide greenhouse gas emissions and to monitor and enforce compliance with this program. The act requires the state board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit, as defined, to be achieved by 2020, equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions levels in 1990. The state board is required to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions. This bill would prohibit the state board from adopting any requirement for the procurement of eligible renewable energy resources by a retail seller or local publicly owned electric utility. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 399.30 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 1391, to be operative only if AB 1391 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill Text
- Amended 09/09/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf September 09, 2011
- Amended 09/02/11 - Amended Assembly pdf September 02, 2011
- Amended 04/26/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 26, 2011
- Introduced 12/06/10 - Introduced pdf December 06, 2010
- SB23 View text html
Action History
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 52. Noes 17. Page 3248.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (September 9).
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 3228.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2811.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 17).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 4. Page 1182.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 857.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 6.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Simitian · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Simitian
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 15 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 52 | 17 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 21% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 7% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 22% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 13% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 10% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 23 do?
- (1) Existing law creates the California renewables portfolio standard program (RPS program) and the Renewable Energy Resources Program to increase the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources, as defined. Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session, the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , by June 30, 2011, is required to study and provide a report to the Legislature that analyzes run-of-river hydroelectric generating facilities, as defined, in British Columbia, including whether these facilities are, or should be, included as renewable electrical generation facilities for purposes of the Renewable Energy Resources Program administered by the Energy Commission or eligible renewable energy resources for purposes of the RPS program. Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session, the Energy Commission, among other things, is required to adopt regulations specifying procedures for enforcement of the RPS requirements by July 1, 2011. Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) , by July 1, 2011, is required to determine the effective load carrying capacity of wind and solar energy resources on the electrical grid. This bill would extend the compliance date for these corresponding reporting and regulatory requirements, as provided. (2) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the 2011–12 First Extraordinary Session,the PUC, in consultation with the Energy Commission, is required to report to the Legislature by January 1 of every even-numbered year on (A) the progress and status of procurement activities by each retail seller, (B) the status of permitting and siting eligible renewable energy resources and transmission facilities necessary to supply electricity generated to load, (C) the projected ability of electrical corporations to meet the RPS program procurement requirements under a cost limitation established by the PUC and any recommendations for revisions to those cost limitations, and (D) barriers to, and policy recommendations for, achieving the renewables portfolio standard established pursuant to the RPS program. This bill would delete the requirement that the PUC report on the projected ability of electrical corporations to meet the RPS program procurement requirements under a cost limitation established by the PUC and any recommendations for revisions to those cost limitations, and would require that the first report be made on January 1, 2014. (3) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the First Extraordinary Session of the 2011–12 Session,the PUC is required to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, to be procured by each retail seller, as defined, for specified compliance periods, sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 20% of retail sales for the period January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, 25% of retail sales by December 31, 2016, and 33% of retail sales by December 31, 2020, and in all subsequent years. The PUC is required to establish the quantity of electricity products to be procured by the retail seller for each compliance period by January 1, 2012. The RPS program, consistent with the goals of procuring the least-cost and best-fit eligible renewable energy resources that meet project viability principles, requires that all retail sellers procure a balanced portfolio of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources, as specified. The RPS program requires the PUC to direct each electrical corporation to annually prepare a renewable energy procurement plan containing specified matter and an annual compliance report. This bill would require the PUC to establish the quantity of electricity products to be procured by the retail seller for each compliance period by June 1, 2012, and require that the compliance report be submitted at least annually. (4) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the First Extraordinary Session of the 2011–12 Session,an eligible renewable energy resource is defined for the purposes of the RPS program to include a small hydroelectric generation unit with a nameplate capacity not exceeding 40 megawatts that is operated as part of a water supply or conveyance system, if the retail seller or local publicly owned electric utility procured the electricity from the facility as of December 31, 2005. This bill would instead make a small hydroelectric generation unit with a nameplate capacity not exceeding 40 megawatts an eligible renewable energy resource if a retail seller or local publicly owned electric utility operates the facility to supply or convey water to its customers and procured the electricity from the facility as of December 31, 2005. (5) Effective on the 91st day after the adjournment of the First Extraordinary Session of the 2011–12 Session,the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility, as defined, is required to adopt a program for the enforcement of the RPS program on or before January 1, 2012. This bill would extend this deadline until January 1, 2013. (6) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (the act) , establishes the State Air Resources Board (state board) as the state agency responsible for monitoring and regulating sources emitting greenhouse gases. The act requires the state board to adopt regulations to require the reporting and verification of statewide greenhouse gas emissions and to monitor and enforce compliance with this program. The act requires the state board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit, as defined, to be achieved by 2020, equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions levels in 1990. The state board is required to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions. This bill would prohibit the state board from adopting any requirement for the procurement of eligible renewable energy resources by a retail seller or local publicly owned electric utility. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 399.30 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 1391, to be operative only if AB 1391 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is chaptered last.
- Who sponsors SB 23?
- SB 23 is sponsored by Simitian.
- What is the current status of SB 23?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 23?
- Track SB 23 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 23
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 23
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →