Oil spill prevention and administrative fee.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1192 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1192.
You're tracking SB 1192
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1192 — Oil spill prevention and administrative fee.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law imposes an oil spill prevention and administration fee in an amount determined by the administrator to implement oil spill prevention activities, but not to exceed, until January 1, 2015, $0.065 per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products, on persons owning crude oil or petroleum products at a marine terminal. The fee is deposited into the Oil Spill Prevention and Administration Fund in the State Treasury. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, moneys in the fund are available for specified purposes, including to cover the costs incurred by the Oiled Wildlife Care Network for training and field collection, and search and rescue activities. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, increase the maximum annual assessment from $0.065 to $0.068 per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products. The bill would subsequently decrease the annual assessment, beginning January 1, 2015, to a maximum of $0.050 per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products. Existing law permits the administrator to charge a nontank vessel owner or operator a reasonable fee, to be collected with each application to obtain a certificate of financial responsibility, in an amount that is based upon the administrator's costs in implementing oil spill prevention relating to nontank vessels. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, require the fee to be at least $3,500 per nontank vessel but would give the administrator discretion to reduce the fee for nontank vessels that pose a reduced risk of pollution. Existing law requires the administrator to submit for each fiscal year, as a part of the Governor's Budget, a proposed appropriation from interest earned on moneys deposited into the Oil Spill Response Trust Fund, in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, for the purposes of equipping, operating, and maintaining the network of oiled wildlife rescue and rehabilitation stations, proactive oiled wildlife search and collection rescue efforts, and supporting technology development and research related to oiled wildlife care. Existing law requires that any remaining interest earned be deposited into the Oil Spill Prevention and Administration Fund. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, transfer 3 mills of the per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products fee collected, and $250 of the per nontank vessel fee collected, to fund specified activities the Oiled Wildlife Care Network. The bill would also allow another additional amount, not to exceed the difference between the interest earned and $2,000,000, to be included in the proposed appropriation from funds deposited into the Oil Spill Response Trust Fund if this proposed appropriation exceeds the interest earned on the funds deposited into the Oil Spill Response Trust Fund available for the fiscal year for which the appropriation is proposed.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/20/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 20, 2012
- Amended 08/07/12 - Amended Assembly pdf August 07, 2012
- Amended 06/25/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 25, 2012
- Amended 05/29/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 29, 2012
- Amended 03/29/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 29, 2012
- Introduced 02/22/12 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2012
- SB1192 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 2).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 3743.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3592.) (May 24).
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 7.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3265.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and E.Q.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Evans · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Evans
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 35% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1192 do?
- Existing law imposes an oil spill prevention and administration fee in an amount determined by the administrator to implement oil spill prevention activities, but not to exceed, until January 1, 2015, $0.065 per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products, on persons owning crude oil or petroleum products at a marine terminal. The fee is deposited into the Oil Spill Prevention and Administration Fund in the State Treasury. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, moneys in the fund are available for specified purposes, including to cover the costs incurred by the Oiled Wildlife Care Network for training and field collection, and search and rescue activities. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, increase the maximum annual assessment from $0.065 to $0.068 per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products. The bill would subsequently decrease the annual assessment, beginning January 1, 2015, to a maximum of $0.050 per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products. Existing law permits the administrator to charge a nontank vessel owner or operator a reasonable fee, to be collected with each application to obtain a certificate of financial responsibility, in an amount that is based upon the administrator's costs in implementing oil spill prevention relating to nontank vessels. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, require the fee to be at least $3,500 per nontank vessel but would give the administrator discretion to reduce the fee for nontank vessels that pose a reduced risk of pollution. Existing law requires the administrator to submit for each fiscal year, as a part of the Governor's Budget, a proposed appropriation from interest earned on moneys deposited into the Oil Spill Response Trust Fund, in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, for the purposes of equipping, operating, and maintaining the network of oiled wildlife rescue and rehabilitation stations, proactive oiled wildlife search and collection rescue efforts, and supporting technology development and research related to oiled wildlife care. Existing law requires that any remaining interest earned be deposited into the Oil Spill Prevention and Administration Fund. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, transfer 3 mills of the per barrel of crude oil or petroleum products fee collected, and $250 of the per nontank vessel fee collected, to fund specified activities the Oiled Wildlife Care Network. The bill would also allow another additional amount, not to exceed the difference between the interest earned and $2,000,000, to be included in the proposed appropriation from funds deposited into the Oil Spill Response Trust Fund if this proposed appropriation exceeds the interest earned on the funds deposited into the Oil Spill Response Trust Fund available for the fiscal year for which the appropriation is proposed.
- Who sponsors SB 1192?
- SB 1192 is sponsored by Evans.
- What is the current status of SB 1192?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1192?
- Track SB 1192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1192
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1192
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →