California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2467 — Protective orders: electronic monitoring.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 513, Statutes of 2012.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Mixed recorded votes

    9 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes a court with jurisdiction over a criminal matter, upon a good cause belief that harm to, or intimidation or dissuasion of, a victim or witness has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, to issue specified orders, including an order protecting victims of violent crime from all contact by the defendant, or contact, with the intent to annoy, harass, threaten, or commit acts of violence, by the defendant. Existing law also authorizes the issuance of a restraining order, valid for up to 10 years, in all cases in which a defendant has been convicted of a crime of domestic violence. This bill would authorize a court, when issuing a protective or restraining order pursuant to the above provisions, to require electronic monitoring of the defendant if the local government, as defined, adopts a policy, with the concurrence of the county sheriff or the chief probation officer with jurisdiction, to authorize electronic monitoring of defendants and to specify the agency with jurisdiction for this purpose. The bill would require the defendant to pay for the monitoring if the court finds that the defendant is able to pay the costs of that monitoring and, if the court finds the defendant is unable to pay the costs, would authorize the court to order the costs to be paid by the local government that adopted the policy to authorize electronic monitoring. The bill would limit the duration of the electronic monitoring to one year.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 513, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6515.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6488.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 1. Page 4864.).

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).

  10. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5134.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).

  19. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  24. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  25. Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.

  26. Read first time.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  28. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Anderson · Cosponsor
  • Garrick · Cosponsor
  • Hueso · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hueso

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Anderson
  • Garrick

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 75002
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 78002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hill — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Perea — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Conway — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Cook — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31105
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 34105
% of votes cast 85%3%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Huff — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Walters — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Kehoe — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 72005
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 75005
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fuentes — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lara — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Donnelly — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Not Voting
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Harkey — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Campos — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Norby — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Davis — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2467 do?
Existing law authorizes a court with jurisdiction over a criminal matter, upon a good cause belief that harm to, or intimidation or dissuasion of, a victim or witness has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, to issue specified orders, including an order protecting victims of violent crime from all contact by the defendant, or contact, with the intent to annoy, harass, threaten, or commit acts of violence, by the defendant. Existing law also authorizes the issuance of a restraining order, valid for up to 10 years, in all cases in which a defendant has been convicted of a crime of domestic violence. This bill would authorize a court, when issuing a protective or restraining order pursuant to the above provisions, to require electronic monitoring of the defendant if the local government, as defined, adopts a policy, with the concurrence of the county sheriff or the chief probation officer with jurisdiction, to authorize electronic monitoring of defendants and to specify the agency with jurisdiction for this purpose. The bill would require the defendant to pay for the monitoring if the court finds that the defendant is able to pay the costs of that monitoring and, if the court finds the defendant is unable to pay the costs, would authorize the court to order the costs to be paid by the local government that adopted the policy to authorize electronic monitoring. The bill would limit the duration of the electronic monitoring to one year.
Who sponsors AB 2467?
AB 2467 is sponsored by Anderson, Garrick, and Hueso.
What is the current status of AB 2467?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2467?
Track AB 2467 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2467

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2467

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →