California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 436 — Public works: labor compliance.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 378, Statutes of 2011.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the awarding body for a public works project to not require the payment of the general prevailing rate of per diem wages on public works projects of specified sizes and types of work, if the awarding body elects to initiate and enforce a labor compliance program containing specified requirements for every public works project under the authority of the awarding body or the awarding body elects to meet certain requirements with regard to any public works project under its authority, including payment of a fee to the Department of Industrial Relations for the enforcement of prevailing wage obligations, as specified, which may be waived under specified circumstances, determined by the department and deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund. Existing law also requires the Director of Industrial Relations, with the approval of the Director of Finance, to assess a fee on any awarding body using funds derived from any bonds issued by the state to fund public works projects, as specified, which are deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. Existing law also requires an awarding body that chooses to use funds derived from either the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2002 or the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004, or the body awarding any contract for a public works project financed in any part with funds made available by the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002 or the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, to pay a fee to the department sufficient to support the department's costs in ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing wage requirements on the project and labor compliance enforcement, as specified, to be deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund. Existing law authorizes the department to waive the fee where specified criteria are met. Existing law gives specified authority for certain school district governing boards, governing boards of community college districts and community college facility construction projects, cities, counties, qualified entities that operate a wastewater facility, solid waste management facility, or water recycling facility, transit operators, and unified school districts to enter into design-build contracts for specified projects if certain requirements are met, including the establishment and enforcement of a labor compliance program or the contracting with a 3rd party to operate a labor compliance program. Existing law gives specified authority for the San Diego Model School Development Agency to award construction contracts, as specified, and requires it to establish and enforce a labor compliance program or to contract with a 3rd party to operate a labor compliance program. Existing law requires entities contracting under the above provisions to pay a fee to the department, established by the department as specified, sufficient to support the department's costs in ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing wage requirements on the project and labor compliance. Existing law requires all fees collected pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund and to be used only for enforcement of prevailing wage requirements on those projects and authorizes the department to waive the fee if specified criteria are met. This bill would make revisions regarding the method by which the Department of Industrial Relations sets reimbursement rates for its costs of performing prevailing wage monitoring and enforcement on the specified public works projects described above, when the reimbursement to the department may be waived, and would exempt from the above-described requirements those public works projects financed in any part by the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002. This bill would also provide that, upon an order of the Director of Finance, a loan in an amount not to exceed $4,300,000 shall be made from the Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund to the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, thereby depositing additional moneys into a continuously appropriated fund.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 378, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 3190.).

  5. From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 8).

  6. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 3059.)

  7. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 10. Page 2353.).

  10. From committee: That the measure be returned to the Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (September 1).

  11. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 11).

  17. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  19. Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  20. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  21. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 1723.)

  22. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  23. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  24. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).

  25. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  26. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & E. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

  28. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  29. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  30. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  31. Referred to Com. on INS.

  32. From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

  33. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Padilla · Cosponsor
  • Solorio · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Solorio

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Padilla

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 51 Yea · 27 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 502502
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 512702
% of votes cast 64%34%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hill — Yea
Butler — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Ma — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Perea — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Dickinson — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Miller — Nay
Norby — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 10 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20908
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 221008
% of votes cast 55%25%0%20%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Huff — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Runner — Nay
Fuller — Not Voting
Liu — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Walters — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6300
Total 6300
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Emmerson — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 52 Yea · 24 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 512204
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 522404
% of votes cast 65%30%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Gorell — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Perea — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Butler — Yea
Carter — Not Voting
Hagman — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Knight — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Davis — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 436 do?
Existing law authorizes the awarding body for a public works project to not require the payment of the general prevailing rate of per diem wages on public works projects of specified sizes and types of work, if the awarding body elects to initiate and enforce a labor compliance program containing specified requirements for every public works project under the authority of the awarding body or the awarding body elects to meet certain requirements with regard to any public works project under its authority, including payment of a fee to the Department of Industrial Relations for the enforcement of prevailing wage obligations, as specified, which may be waived under specified circumstances, determined by the department and deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund. Existing law also requires the Director of Industrial Relations, with the approval of the Director of Finance, to assess a fee on any awarding body using funds derived from any bonds issued by the state to fund public works projects, as specified, which are deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. Existing law also requires an awarding body that chooses to use funds derived from either the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2002 or the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004, or the body awarding any contract for a public works project financed in any part with funds made available by the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002 or the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, to pay a fee to the department sufficient to support the department's costs in ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing wage requirements on the project and labor compliance enforcement, as specified, to be deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund. Existing law authorizes the department to waive the fee where specified criteria are met. Existing law gives specified authority for certain school district governing boards, governing boards of community college districts and community college facility construction projects, cities, counties, qualified entities that operate a wastewater facility, solid waste management facility, or water recycling facility, transit operators, and unified school districts to enter into design-build contracts for specified projects if certain requirements are met, including the establishment and enforcement of a labor compliance program or the contracting with a 3rd party to operate a labor compliance program. Existing law gives specified authority for the San Diego Model School Development Agency to award construction contracts, as specified, and requires it to establish and enforce a labor compliance program or to contract with a 3rd party to operate a labor compliance program. Existing law requires entities contracting under the above provisions to pay a fee to the department, established by the department as specified, sufficient to support the department's costs in ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing wage requirements on the project and labor compliance. Existing law requires all fees collected pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund and to be used only for enforcement of prevailing wage requirements on those projects and authorizes the department to waive the fee if specified criteria are met. This bill would make revisions regarding the method by which the Department of Industrial Relations sets reimbursement rates for its costs of performing prevailing wage monitoring and enforcement on the specified public works projects described above, when the reimbursement to the department may be waived, and would exempt from the above-described requirements those public works projects financed in any part by the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002. This bill would also provide that, upon an order of the Director of Finance, a loan in an amount not to exceed $4,300,000 shall be made from the Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund to the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, thereby depositing additional moneys into a continuously appropriated fund.
Who sponsors AB 436?
AB 436 is sponsored by Padilla and Solorio.
What is the current status of AB 436?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 436?
Track AB 436 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 436

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 436

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →