California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 366 — Defendants: involuntary antipsychotic medication.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 654, Statutes of 2011.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides that if a defendant becomes mentally incompetent, a trial or judgment related to that defendant shall be suspended until he or she becomes mentally competent. Existing law establishes procedures whereby the court determines the appropriate facility where an incompetent defendant shall be delivered for treatment, and determines whether the defendant consents to the administration of antipsychotic medication, or determines whether involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication is appropriate, as specified. This bill would require, as of July 1, 2012, the court to determine if the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding antipsychotic medication before seeking consent from the defendant for those medications. The bill would provide that when, under specified conditions and in the opinion of the treating psychiatrist, involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication becomes necessary, that medication may be administered to the defendant for not more than 21 days, provided, however, that, within 72 hours of certifying that involuntary antipsychotic medication has become medically necessary and appropriate, an administrative law judge conducts a hearing and reviews the treating psychiatrist's determination to administer the medication and concurs in that determination. The bill would require the defendant to be represented at the hearing by an attorney or patients' rights advocate and would prescribe other rights of the defendant with respect to the hearing. The bill would provide that if the administrative law judge concurs in the treating psychiatrist's certification, antipsychotic medication would be authorized to continue to be administered for the 21-day certification period and if the administrative law judge disagrees with the certification, the medication would not be administered until a court so ordered. The bill would require the treating psychiatrist to file a copy of the certification and a petition with the court for issuance of an order to administer antipsychotic medication beyond the 21-day certification period, as specified, and would waive fees for the filing of the petition or other document or paper related to the petition. The bill would require the court to determine, prior to the expiration of the 21-day certification period, whether the medication should be administered beyond the 21-day certification period, as specified. The bill would provide that an order for the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication beyond the 21-day certification period would be valid for no more than one year, and would require the court to review the order 6 months after the order was made, as specified, to determine if the grounds for involuntary medication remain. The bill would require reports at 6-month intervals, or until the defendant becomes mentally competent, and would require certain items to be addressed in the report, including, among other things, whether or not the defendant has the capacity to make decisions concerning antipsychotic medication. After reviewing the reports, a court would be required to determine whether the need for continued administration of antipsychotic medication exists, as specified. The bill would also provide that its terms do not preclude a defendant from filing a petition for habeas corpus to challenge the continuing validity of an order authorizing the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 654, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3072.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2354.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).

  11. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 5).

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  15. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1649.)

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).

  20. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  21. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  24. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  28. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  29. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  30. From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

  31. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Achadjian · Cosponsor
  • Blakeslee · Cosponsor
  • Mendoza · Cosponsor
  • Travis Allen · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Achadjian
  • Blakeslee
  • Mendoza

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 76001
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Carter — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Allen — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Hall — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Silva — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Not Voting
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Price — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8001
Total 8001
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 76001
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Huber — Yea
Wagner — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Conway — Yea
Lara — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Lara — Yea
Norby — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8003
Total 8003
% of votes cast 73%0%0%27%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Butler — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Alejo — Not Voting
Donnelly — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Williams — Not Voting
Nielsen — Yea
Davis — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 366 do?
Existing law provides that if a defendant becomes mentally incompetent, a trial or judgment related to that defendant shall be suspended until he or she becomes mentally competent. Existing law establishes procedures whereby the court determines the appropriate facility where an incompetent defendant shall be delivered for treatment, and determines whether the defendant consents to the administration of antipsychotic medication, or determines whether involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication is appropriate, as specified. This bill would require, as of July 1, 2012, the court to determine if the defendant lacks capacity to make decisions regarding antipsychotic medication before seeking consent from the defendant for those medications. The bill would provide that when, under specified conditions and in the opinion of the treating psychiatrist, involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication becomes necessary, that medication may be administered to the defendant for not more than 21 days, provided, however, that, within 72 hours of certifying that involuntary antipsychotic medication has become medically necessary and appropriate, an administrative law judge conducts a hearing and reviews the treating psychiatrist's determination to administer the medication and concurs in that determination. The bill would require the defendant to be represented at the hearing by an attorney or patients' rights advocate and would prescribe other rights of the defendant with respect to the hearing. The bill would provide that if the administrative law judge concurs in the treating psychiatrist's certification, antipsychotic medication would be authorized to continue to be administered for the 21-day certification period and if the administrative law judge disagrees with the certification, the medication would not be administered until a court so ordered. The bill would require the treating psychiatrist to file a copy of the certification and a petition with the court for issuance of an order to administer antipsychotic medication beyond the 21-day certification period, as specified, and would waive fees for the filing of the petition or other document or paper related to the petition. The bill would require the court to determine, prior to the expiration of the 21-day certification period, whether the medication should be administered beyond the 21-day certification period, as specified. The bill would provide that an order for the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication beyond the 21-day certification period would be valid for no more than one year, and would require the court to review the order 6 months after the order was made, as specified, to determine if the grounds for involuntary medication remain. The bill would require reports at 6-month intervals, or until the defendant becomes mentally competent, and would require certain items to be addressed in the report, including, among other things, whether or not the defendant has the capacity to make decisions concerning antipsychotic medication. After reviewing the reports, a court would be required to determine whether the need for continued administration of antipsychotic medication exists, as specified. The bill would also provide that its terms do not preclude a defendant from filing a petition for habeas corpus to challenge the continuing validity of an order authorizing the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication.
Who sponsors AB 366?
AB 366 is sponsored by Achadjian, Blakeslee, Mendoza, and Travis Allen.
What is the current status of AB 366?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 366?
Track AB 366 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 366

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 366

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →