California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1077 — State parks: Colonel Allensworth State Historic Park.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 582, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 80% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides for a state park system of which the Colonel Allensworth State Historic Park in Tulare County is a unit. This bill would require the Department of Parks and Recreation to notify the State Park and Recreation Commission of any proposed development that may substantially impact the historical, cultural, or recreational significance of the Colonel Allensworth State Historic Park, and would require the commission, upon receipt of that notification to hold a duly noticed public hearing to receive public input regarding the potential impacts of the proposed development on the park. The bill would require the commission, following the public hearing, to submit, in writing, to the department a summary of its conclusions on the potential park impacts that may be caused by the proposed development for transmission by the department to the appropriate local government entities. The bill would also require the department, in consultation with the State Office of Historic Preservation, to study the feasibility of recommending that the park be considered for designation as a National Historic Landmark. The bill would make legislative findings as to the necessity of a special statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 582, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 25. Page 2561.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 12. Page 2011.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  9. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 28).

  11. Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 25. Page 1781.)

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).

  16. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  17. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Read second time and amended.

  19. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 26).

  20. Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.

  21. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  22. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • Bradford · Cosponsor
  • Carter · Primary
  • Mitchell · Cosponsor
  • Davis · Cosponsor
  • Hall · Cosponsor
  • Price · Cosponsor
  • Swanson · Cosponsor
  • Wright · Cosponsor
  • V. Manuel Pérez · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Carter

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (112)

112 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 112 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1077 CARTER Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 49 Yea · 25 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0200
Unaffiliated 492305
Democratic 0001
Total 492506
% of votes cast 61%31%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Carter — Yea
Huber — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Lara — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Davis — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Bonilla — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB1077 Carter By Price

Passed 23 Yea · 12 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221203
Republican 0001
Democratic 1001
Total 231205
% of votes cast 58%30%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Nay
Harman — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Walters — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Yee — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

AB 1077 CARTER Assembly Third Reading

Passed 47 Yea · 25 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 462308
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 472508
% of votes cast 59%31%0%10%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Swanson — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gordon — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Fletcher — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Not Voting
Portantino — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Chesbro — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Valadao — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 9 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8300
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 9400
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1077 do?
Existing law provides for a state park system of which the Colonel Allensworth State Historic Park in Tulare County is a unit. This bill would require the Department of Parks and Recreation to notify the State Park and Recreation Commission of any proposed development that may substantially impact the historical, cultural, or recreational significance of the Colonel Allensworth State Historic Park, and would require the commission, upon receipt of that notification to hold a duly noticed public hearing to receive public input regarding the potential impacts of the proposed development on the park. The bill would require the commission, following the public hearing, to submit, in writing, to the department a summary of its conclusions on the potential park impacts that may be caused by the proposed development for transmission by the department to the appropriate local government entities. The bill would also require the department, in consultation with the State Office of Historic Preservation, to study the feasibility of recommending that the park be considered for designation as a National Historic Landmark. The bill would make legislative findings as to the necessity of a special statute.
Who sponsors AB 1077?
AB 1077 is sponsored by Alejo, Bradford, Carter, Mitchell, Davis, Hall, Price, Swanson, Wright, and V. Manuel Pérez.
What is the current status of AB 1077?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1077?
Track AB 1077 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1077

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1077

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →