California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 894 — State government: economic development.

Last action — Vetoed by Governor.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The California Industrial Development Financing Act authorizes cities, counties, cities and counties, and redevelopment agencies to establish industrial development authorities that are authorized to issue industrial development bonds, the proceeds of which may be used to fund capital projects of private enterprise under terms and conditions specified in the act. That act establishes the California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission and grants it various powers relating to industrial development bonds. This bill, the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2011, would authorize the commission to establish the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Loan and Loan Guarantee Program for the purpose of attracting, retaining, and expanding manufacturing facilities, and would require the commission to establish guidelines for the implementation and oversight of the program. The bill would prohibit the commission from commencing the program until the commission adopts a resolution finding that there is sufficient expertise, either directly employed by the commission or employed under a contract with the commission, to assess the credit risk of applicants for assistance under the program and the aggregate credit risk retained by the commission for the loans, loan guarantees, and lines of credit in the commission's program. The bill would require the commission to provide for the development and administration of the program application and evaluation process, and would require that applicants to the program demonstrate that they meet specified requirements. The bill would also require each applicant to pay a nonrefundable application fee. The bill would also create the Manufacturing Program Account within the Industrial Development Fund. The bill would prohibit General Fund moneys from being deposited in the account. The bill would authorize a state agency to contract with the commission, as specified, to contribute prescribed funds for deposit into the account. The bill would prohibit the commission from commencing the program until the commission adopts a resolution finding that there is sufficient money in the account to cover the costs of implementing the program. The bill would allow moneys in the account to be allocated to a lending institution or financial company that will act as trustee of the funds, with the approval of the Department of Finance. The bill would further require the above-described application fees to be deposited in the account to ensure that funds are available to the state for the sole purpose of administration of the program. The bill would require the commission, beginning October 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, to post on its Internet Web site or provide to the Legislature, as specified, a report on the program's activities and impact on the manufacturing industry, and on the state's economy generally. The bill would provide that the above-described provisions shall be implemented only to the extent that sufficient moneys are available to the commission to implement the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Loan and Loan Guarantee Program. The bill would provide that its provisions only remain in effect until January 1, 2017, and as of that date are repealed.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor.

  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  3. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3079.).

  4. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 32. Noes 2. Page 2357.).

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).

  10. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6).

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  13. Referred to Coms. on G.O. and GOV. & F.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1656.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).

  18. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Read second time and amended.

  21. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 12).

  22. Referred to Com. on J., E.D. & E.

  23. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  24. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 894 PÉREZ, V.M. Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 75002
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 78002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Miller — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Allen — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Block — Yea
Conway — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB894 V. Manuel Pérez By Rubio

Passed 32 Yea · 2 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29206
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 32206
% of votes cast 80%5%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Leno — Not Voting
Walters — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8001
Total 8001
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Governance and Finance.

Passed 12 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9100
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 12100
% of votes cast 92%8%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De León — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Wright — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AB 894 PÉREZ, V.M. Assembly Third Reading

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 75002
Republican 2000
Democratic 0001
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Garrick — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Miller — Yea
Perea — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Conway — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Cook — Yea
Lara — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance housing labor technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 894 do?
The California Industrial Development Financing Act authorizes cities, counties, cities and counties, and redevelopment agencies to establish industrial development authorities that are authorized to issue industrial development bonds, the proceeds of which may be used to fund capital projects of private enterprise under terms and conditions specified in the act. That act establishes the California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission and grants it various powers relating to industrial development bonds. This bill, the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2011, would authorize the commission to establish the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Loan and Loan Guarantee Program for the purpose of attracting, retaining, and expanding manufacturing facilities, and would require the commission to establish guidelines for the implementation and oversight of the program. The bill would prohibit the commission from commencing the program until the commission adopts a resolution finding that there is sufficient expertise, either directly employed by the commission or employed under a contract with the commission, to assess the credit risk of applicants for assistance under the program and the aggregate credit risk retained by the commission for the loans, loan guarantees, and lines of credit in the commission's program. The bill would require the commission to provide for the development and administration of the program application and evaluation process, and would require that applicants to the program demonstrate that they meet specified requirements. The bill would also require each applicant to pay a nonrefundable application fee. The bill would also create the Manufacturing Program Account within the Industrial Development Fund. The bill would prohibit General Fund moneys from being deposited in the account. The bill would authorize a state agency to contract with the commission, as specified, to contribute prescribed funds for deposit into the account. The bill would prohibit the commission from commencing the program until the commission adopts a resolution finding that there is sufficient money in the account to cover the costs of implementing the program. The bill would allow moneys in the account to be allocated to a lending institution or financial company that will act as trustee of the funds, with the approval of the Department of Finance. The bill would further require the above-described application fees to be deposited in the account to ensure that funds are available to the state for the sole purpose of administration of the program. The bill would require the commission, beginning October 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, to post on its Internet Web site or provide to the Legislature, as specified, a report on the program's activities and impact on the manufacturing industry, and on the state's economy generally. The bill would provide that the above-described provisions shall be implemented only to the extent that sufficient moneys are available to the commission to implement the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Loan and Loan Guarantee Program. The bill would provide that its provisions only remain in effect until January 1, 2017, and as of that date are repealed.
Who sponsors AB 894?
AB 894 is sponsored by V. Manuel Pérez.
What is the current status of AB 894?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 894?
Track AB 894 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 894

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 894

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →